Smith

Out of principle I won't do one or ask for one. I am required by law to "believe" they are a TN resident and legal to own a firearm. Usually when i ask those questions, they offer to show me their ID or similar, but I decline. I don't begrudge the guys that do and I understand their reasoning but I've walked away from some deals because of it. It's not personal and I don't say anything unless it's necessary. It's a personal principled choice and I leave it at that.

I've had several of both and PSA Micro's. Here is my comparison of the PSA and CR920. In regards to the Glock 43x, it's like a very simplified version of the CR920 with lower mag capacity. The CR920 you can have the lower capacity with a shorter grip or higher capacity with the same grip length as the 43x. The fact that you'd have to buy PSA mags and spend more money than the CR920 to get it close to the CR920's refinement and mag capacity, there is no value to be had. Then you have the optic cut. The CR920 is darn near perfect in it's optic mount system. If you get the MOS 43x you've spent too much for a bad mounting system. If you get the 43x and want it optic cut, you could have bought nearly two 43x's by the time your done. The other option is to get the PSA micro slide that is optic cut, and again, why the Glock at that point? The grip, handling, setup, and shoot ability of the CR920 is right out of the box. The Glock needs a lot and even then falls short of "Perfection".

That reminds me of a smooth version of the tgo one way back in the day. I'd take one of those!

At best Loughner was an "independent" . He is credited with being neither right nor left in his political leanings. Try again.

You equated the right to work and medical/health related requirements for employment as opposite sides of the same issue. They are not related in this scenario. The vaccination requirement violated religious liberty protections/rights in addition to being a stipulation unrelated to the job as agreed to in the hiring and continued employment agreement and understanding. Right to work had nothing to do with the case. I'm big on right to work, these are unrelated in this case. Right to work only came up as a horrible attempt to justify a bad faith attempt at an illegal procedure unrelated to the employee/employer agreement. The judgement agreed. It's like when people use Scripture out of context to justify a principal the scriptures have clearly defined for centuries. That was my point.

Right to work in no way means a right to violate constitutional rights. This has long been established in every constitutional concept. There is an assumption of good will on both parties in right to work. In the same way 2A assumes good will and responsibility of intention. 1A ect.

In

Ironically, two days before I went through Wears Valley on an anniversary motorcycle ride with my wife, I had bought this same quantity for more! Good stuff I use in my 10/22 on ground hogs and other varmints in my backyard. Good luck with the sale good price on great quiet .22 ammo.

One more bump. $700 for both.

Bump.

That is absolutely insane. I guess judges can decide something is illegal at whim with no law or order being broken. Wow!

In

Couple of extra PSA Daggers I have that need new homes. Nashville area. Not interested in trades at this time. 1. FDE Compact Dagger suppressor sights 1 15 rnd mag. Has 60 rnds thought it. 2. FDE SCT frame, PSA SW6 RMR slide and barrel, Ameriglo suppressor sights, Glock lower parts, Davidson trigger, 1-15 rnd mag. Optic not included. Had 40 rounds through it.

I assume you have an MOS? It will fit with the adapter plate or you can grind the extra nubs off and fit it directly

Upload them to imgur and then post the link.