Jump to content

Jack Reacher


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wish it had been cast with someone else in the main role. I try not to watch anything with cruise in it. Can't stand the sight of him.

  • Like 1
Posted

We will go next weekend. We really liked the first one. My father in law said he didn't like Cruise as the lead since Reacher in supposed to be big and tall in the books. I think Cruise is a nut but he did a good job in the role last time.

Posted

I saw the first movie on FX, well, TV.  Liked the lady in peril better. 

Will wait for it to be on TV again.  

Posted

Cruise is a known anti. I will not add to his bank account either.

Yep he is anti gun to the public when asked but you can bet he owns more than a few guns I would guess. Also he is a person that uses something he is suppose to be against which is guns to make millions off in his movies.  I won't be contributing a dime to his pocket................jmho

Posted

The only actors that aren't "anti" can barely find work.  Y'all just might as well say you're never going to watch another new movie or tv show.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Garufa said:

The only actors that aren't "anti" can barely find work.  Y'all just might as well say you're never going to watch another new movie or tv show.

I always chip in to suggest that you need to separate the art from the artist, or you'll miss a lot of enjoyable stuff in life.

And yes, that includes Jane Fonda. :)

- OS

Edited by Oh Shoot
  • Like 4
Posted
17 minutes ago, Garufa said:

The only actors that aren't "anti" can barely find work.  Y'all just might as well say you're never going to watch another new movie or tv show.

Not necessarily true. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/06/18/x-celebrities-love-guns/

Add to this list Clint Eastwood who while isn't acting much these days, has become one of the most respected directors in Hollywood by artists, critics, and fans alike. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, btq96r said:

Not necessarily true. 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/06/18/x-celebrities-love-guns/

Add to this list Clint Eastwood who while isn't acting much these days, has become one of the most respected directors in Hollywood by artists, critics, and fans alike. 

There are always exceptions.  Did you notice the age of most people on that list?   And where they are in their carerers?  I know there are some pro-gun, or rather anti-control people in Hollywod.  Fact of the matter is their numbers are few.

Clint can do whatever he wants, he doesn't have to answer to anyone.  He would whoop Chuck Norris without even blinking an eye.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Oh Shoot said:

I always chip in to suggest that you need to separate the art from the artist, or you'll miss a lot of enjoyable stuff in life.

And yes, that includes Jane Fonda. :)

- OS

You've still got a thing for Barbarella don't you?  :lol:

Posted
Just now, Garufa said:

You've still got a thing for Barbarella don't you?  :lol:

Absolutely her worst role ever, of course. But yeah. ;)

- OS

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/21/2016 at 5:49 PM, Oh Shoot said:

Then of course you didn't see the actual movie.

- OS

I remember her, doesn't that count for something?  

Posted
5 hours ago, Oh Shoot said:

I always chip in to suggest that you need to separate the art from the artist, or you'll miss a lot of enjoyable stuff in life.

And yes, that includes Jane Fonda. :)

- OS

Jane who?!

Posted
11 hours ago, tacops said:

Jane who?!

Haha! I mentioned Jane Fonda to a very intelligent but uppish neighbor who can't be over 25 years old, and he swore up and down he had never heard of her. Talk about someone, Fonda, who has dropped of the face of the earth. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Just saw it. It started like the book but compressed the timeline and locations Then it went away from the book some (bad guys in New Orleans instead of LA so they could). It held closer to the book than I was expecting, but it is still a movie so they can only be so accurate to a 500 page book (unless you want a 6 hour movie.) Overall as a movie just by itself, I think it's pretty good. Good plot, acting, and action scenes. Few little bits were a little on the nose when you compare it to Child's writing, but most Americans would probably need it to understand what's happening.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, macville said:

Just saw it. It started like the book but compressed the timeline and locations Then it went away from the book some (bad guys in New Orleans instead of LA so they could). It held closer to the book than I was expecting, but it is still a movie so they can only be so accurate to a 500 page book (unless you want a 6 hour movie.) Overall as a movie just by itself, I think it's pretty good. Good plot, acting, and action scenes. Few little bits were a little on the nose when you compare it to Child's writing, but most Americans would probably need it to understand what's happening.

Yes, the story compression necessary to fit most books into a 2hour or less movie is sometimes bad for the movie. But so far, I can't get too upset with Cruise's portrayal of Jack Reacher. My only problem is that having read all the books, I still think Tom is a midget version of Jack. lol

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, hipower said:

Yes, the story compression necessary to fit most books into a 2hour or less movie is sometimes bad for the movie. But so far, I can't get too upset with Cruise's portrayal of Jack Reacher. My only problem is that having read all the books, I still think Tom is a midget version of Jack. lol

Agreed. Jack reacher is 6'3 and 250 lbs. Cruse has most of the emotion (or lack thereof) down, but there were moments that felt wrong to me (the ending felt too happy, but it was a nice "movie" ending.) I am wondering if they continue to make them if he'll step out of the role and let someone else closer to the size of the character play it? But I am glad they are making the movies since I do love them. I wish they would make Nothing to Lose as that was one of the books that's really stuck in my mind.

Posted
2 hours ago, macville said:

Agreed. Jack reacher is 6'3 and 250 lbs. Cruse has most of the emotion (or lack thereof) down, but there were moments that felt wrong to me (the ending felt too happy, but it was a nice "movie" ending.) I am wondering if they continue to make them if he'll step out of the role and let someone else closer to the size of the character play it? But I am glad they are making the movies since I do love them. I wish they would make Nothing to Lose as that was one of the books that's really stuck in my mind.

I read so much, and so many different genre that I can't remember the plot to Nothing to Lose, but I've enjoyed all the Reacher books. I saw something on one of the entertainment news shows alluding to Cruse doing at least one more; that he liked these more than the Mission Impossible movies. True or not, who knows? These shows throw out all kinds of things just to reel us in.

Posted
On 10/21/2016 at 6:53 PM, ken56 said:

Cruise is a known anti. I will not add to his bank account either.

The studio already paid him, whether you see it or not.  But the theater, the people that work at the theater, the distributors for films, all of those people haven't been paid yet.  So maybe you could throw them a bone.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, Capbyrd said:

The studio already paid him, whether you see it or not.  But the theater, the people that work at the theater, the distributors for films, all of those people haven't been paid yet.  So maybe you could throw them a bone.  

That is a thought, but we still are supporting, if indirectly, the system that is pushing against us. Hollywood is such a liberally controlled entity that sometimes the only way to fight back is thru public opinion and commentary. jmo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.