Jump to content

Heirs to destroy guns to send "message"


Recommended Posts

What they failed to realize is people that would have bought those heirlooms will instead buy new firearms. The way I see it, Americans are going to buy firearms. They will either buy used or new, but they will spend "X" amount.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
What a bunch of morons. The least they could do is sell the guns and give them to a good cause. I guess they aren't worried about anything other than publicity or they would have thought this through a little more.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

I strongly suspect that they were silently reimbursed by someone with an anti-gun agenda.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

That's why we have wills.  I don't have any immediate family members who would get my guns that would do this.  Honestly, I will make sure mine go to a few people who will keep and appreciate them.  I don't worry about them after that point.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I think this is a bunch of bogus reporting myself, has anyone thought how much 6.5 tons of ammo is. I don't believe anyone in Kali had that many guns and that much ammo. Funny they are going to keep the 250K cash. If they would have sold the guns they would have donated the money to Hillary or Bernie anyway. Makes all of our guns more valuable the way I look at it. Morons!!!!! This is why even single people need a will, leave your stuff to someone that will enjoy like you do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Dirtshooter said:

I think this is a bunch of bogus reporting myself, has anyone thought how much 6.5 tons of ammo is. I don't believe anyone in Kali had that many guns and that much ammo. Funny they are going to keep the 250K cash. If they would have sold the guns they would have donated the money to Hillary or Bernie anyway. Makes all of our guns more valuable the way I look at it. Morons!!!!! This is why even single people need a will, leave your stuff to someone that will enjoy like you do.

Not as much as you think.  Just an example, a full crate (880 rounds) of 7.62x54r weighs roughly 60 lbs.  At 13000 lbs. (6.5 tons) that's about 217 crates, or approximately 2 pallets.  There are a lot of people who stockpile those amounts and more ...

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Devil's advocate here but; Who's the rightful owner?  That would be them.  Is a person NOT entitled to do with their property however they see fit so long as it's legal?  They can shove them up their butt and cluck like a chicken if that makes them happy.  

I wouldn't do it, you wouldn't do but it IS their decision.  How angry do we get when we are told what we can and cannot do with our own property?  

Ultimately, the destruction of their property only makes YOUR property more valuable.  

A fool and his money are soon parted.  Let the fools piss away their money.  Means NOTHING to me.  I'm neither impressed or outraged but perfectly indifferent to all idiots and their decisions so long as it doesn't impact the rest of our lives.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dirtshooter said:

I think this is a bunch of bogus reporting myself, has anyone thought how much 6.5 tons of ammo is. I don't believe anyone in Kali had that many guns and that much ammo. Funny they are going to keep the 250K cash. If they would have sold the guns they would have donated the money to Hillary or Bernie anyway. Makes all of our guns more valuable the way I look at it. Morons!!!!! This is why even single people need a will, leave your stuff to someone that will enjoy like you do.

It is a true story.  I remember it hitting the news last summer.  They found the guy dead in his car parked on his street.  He had been there for a while.  He was a loner and nobody new about all his guns until the police went into his house.  Here is a link to the original story:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lapd-guns-20150720-story.html

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, Caster said:

Devil's advocate here but; Who's the rightful owner?  That would be them.  Is a person NOT entitled to do with their property however they see fit so long as it's legal?  They can shove them up their butt and cluck like a chicken if that makes them happy.  

I wouldn't do it, you wouldn't do but it IS their decision.  How angry do we get when we are told what we can and cannot do with our own property?  

Ultimately, the destruction of their property only makes YOUR property more valuable.  

A fool and his money are soon parted.  Let the fools piss away their money.  Means NOTHING to me.  I'm neither impressed or outraged but perfectly indifferent to all idiots and their decisions so long as it doesn't impact the rest of our lives.  

I don't think anyone should tell them what they can or cannot do with their property.  That doesn't mean I don't reserve the right to think that they are unbridled idiots.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Caster said:

Devil's advocate here but; Who's the rightful owner?  That would be them.  Is a person NOT entitled to do with their property however they see fit so long as it's legal?  They can shove them up their butt and cluck like a chicken if that makes them happy.  

I wouldn't do it, you wouldn't do but it IS their decision.  How angry do we get when we are told what we can and cannot do with our own property?  

Ultimately, the destruction of their property only makes YOUR property more valuable.  

A fool and his money are soon parted.  Let the fools piss away their money.  Means NOTHING to me.  I'm neither impressed or outraged but perfectly indifferent to all idiots and their decisions so long as it doesn't impact the rest of our lives.  

I gotta agree with you on that. Property rights, whether it be real estate or personal or otherwise, trump everything else. As long as it isn't hurting someone else.

 

It would be a shame if they were destroying pre-64 winchesters or vintage S&Ws but it's the same as destroying fine artwork, which arguably those sort of guns are. You may not like it but if they own it it's their right to do with their property as they wish.

 

They're still idiots though.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.