9th Circuit court of Appeals in San Francisco ruling on concealed carry

[DaveTN]

20 minutes ago, Sidecarist said:

What has made states rights a farce is all the federal funding tied to infrastructure. 

Unless/until states tell the feds to keep the $$$$$$$$$ then the states have no rights.

Certainly States have Rights. They just have to be willing to stand up for them. Caving to 55MPH speed limits to get your Federal money is a lot different than letting the Feds tell you whether you can/can’t carry guns. The Tennessee Firearms freedom act hasn’t been tested either. The state says its law and the Feds say they will arrest violators. Someone has to fold; right now it’s the state.

[Mindless-Focus]

[Wingshooter]

3 hours ago, Sidecarist said:

What has made states rights a farce is all the federal funding tied to infrastructure. 

Unless/until states tell the feds to keep the $$$$$$$$$ then the states have no rights.

Yep. They'll even allow men in the ladies restrooms to get the $$$$ 

[Wingshooter]

5 hours ago, Grand Torino said:

Exactly....and you're allowed to carry openly but not under your coat. Really? The 2nd doesn't say you can't carry or even under your coat but some liberal judge want's to nit pick it to death. I'm sorry but I find this kind of ruling ridiculous no matter what some arm chair lawyers seem to think.

I always open carry under my shirt

Edited June 10, 2016 by Wingshooter

[Steve32]

 

[NextExit]

On 6/10/2016 at 6:51 AM, tnhawk said:

During the time I was in the Army, I was usually happy to have "loud killing machines" fly over me.

Yup.  When I was in the Air Force, the sound of those F-16's taking off every day was the sound of freedom.