Democratic Senator uses gun to defend himself

[Chief07]

They preach gun control for you and me. BUT...............

 

Democratic senator, R.C. Soles (D-NC) used a gun to defend himself from two home invaders. One person was shot, reportedly sustaining non-life threatening injuries. This is an interesting turn of events, as the Senator has a long history of being pro-gun control.

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff’s Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested,declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

“I am not in a position to talk to you,” Soles said by telephone. “I’m right in the middle of an investigation.”

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn’t hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

By his strong anti-gun stance, one would think the good senator would have done exactly what he expected the rest of us American’s to do — which is call 911 and wait patiently for the police to arrive and handle the situation.

Actions speak louder than words, and Senator Soles’ actions speak volumes. By being unavailable for comment, his actions speak even louder.

Are We The People once again supposed to follow along like docile sheep, chanting the mantra “Do as I say, not as I do”?

Had the senator responded otherwise to a request for an interview, one might be led to think there was hope that he would change his stance on gun control. However, his refusal leads one to believe he will continue with his lofty belief that his life matters — but not yours or mine.

[Garufa]

You know that's from 6 years ago, right?

[Oh Shoot]

You know that's from 6 years ago, right?

 

Also, his voting record apparently wasn't notably anti- gun. That somehow became a convenient meme somewhere along the way. NRA gave him A's and B's over his last decade in office.

 

- OS

[Chief07]

You know that's from 6 years ago, right?

I'm not sure how old this article is, I just came across it. My point about this is,

Most of these anti-gun politicians are hypocrites.

It's ok for them to protect themselves but you and I can't.

They are granted special access, but you and I are denied.

What makes their life any more important than yours or mine.

Politicians can get concealed carry but the average Joe can't. Especially in jurisdictions

that deny our basic 2nd amendment rights. 

This is my major complaint. Especially this nit-wit in the Whitehorse and these nit-wits in Congress..

[monkeylizard]

I'm not sure how old this article is, I just came across it. My point about this is,

Most of these anti-gun politicians are hypocrites.

It's ok for them to protect themselves but you and I can't.

They are granted special access, but you and I are denied.

What makes their life any more important than yours or mine.

Politicians can get concealed carry but the average Joe can't. Especially in jurisdictions

that deny our basic 2nd amendment rights. 

This is my major complaint. Especially this nit-wit in the Whitehorse and these nit-wits in Congress..

 

How does a senator who isn't an anti-gunner defending himself support any of those statements? They are all true (Sen. Boxer has a carry permit) but this story has nothing to do with hypocritical leftists. Not everyone with a D next to their name is an anti-gunner.

Edited October 6, 2015 by monkeylizard