Nano Glock Carbine

[mcordell]

Not sure if this has been posted yet .... These seem to have came out of no where

These are made by mag tactical

I am thinking this would be a sweet supressed SBR :-)

Also due to it using the UTG rail I am sure it would accept other rail systems

Pros:
- 9mm
- Threaded Barrel
- Takes Glock Mags
- Takes AR Triggers
- Takes AR Grips
- Takes AR Stocks (mil spec diameter)
- UTG PRO Rail
- $549!!!

http://www.centerfiresystems.com/ri0034.aspx

Edited February 13, 2015 by mcordell

[MacGyver]

Neat.  It's good to see some cost coming down in this market.

[Lumber_Jack]

Are the receivers on that polymer?

Is the gas system the same as any other AR9?

[MadMarx]

Oh god, I hope they make this in 45 ACP. That would match my Glock 21 that I have a bunch of mag for.

[hipower]

Looks like the Just Right Carbines at first look to me.

[E4 No More]

Looks like the Just Right Carbines at first look to me.

I thought the same thing at first.

[mcordell]

Are the receivers on that polymer?

Is the gas system the same as any other AR9?

Barrel: 16 ½” 4140 steel, 1:10 twist nitride finish with muzzle threaded ½”-36

Chamber: 9mm, 9x19

Weight: 6.1 lb

Length: 30” collapsed, 33” extended

15rd Magazine included

Accepts 9mm Glock® Mags

Upper Receiver: billet machined 6061 T6 material, black anodized, picatinny rail on top

Lower Receiver: billet machined 6061 T6 material, black anodized

Trigger, Hammer & Disconnector specialty Nickel Teflon Plating

Bolt Carrier: is 8620 tool steel with nitride finish

Forend: AR15, UTG free Ultra Slim Forend with picatinny rail on top and 2” picatinny rail on bottom

Butt Stock: Mil-spec 6 position UTG

Pistol Grip: A2

Safety Lever in standard AR15 position, left side

Sights: none

[I am Groot!]

I have been considering purchasing RRA 9mm, but I am going to have to put my thinking cap back on. That looks like a quality option.

[A.J. Holst]

Neat. It's good to see some cost coming down in this market.

Concur! There is a void in price point from the Hi-Point to the other 9mm pcc's on the market.

After "customizing" my 995, getting a few extra mags and a case I'm still under $300. If I want to upgrade, are the other options worth double or triple the price point for a hobbyist?

starting under $600 retail, I may re prioritize getting an AR.

[Steelharp]

Like it!!!!

[will_reed]

I'm just waiting for some more hands on reviews of these things. It's priced right, and comes with my favorite rail already.

[Dolomite_supafly]

I like it as well and it just made my short list. It would make a great gun to SBR and suppress.

 

The only thing I hate, yes HATE, about it is the fact they are still using a buffer tube with the recoil spring in it. This means there is no way to add a folding stock which is something I have been wanting for a very long time, a 9mm carbine with a folding stock. That is why I am hoping that the 9mm AK becomes a reality because you could SBR it and make it a very compact package.

 

But with a 4" barrel and a suppressor it would still be a small package.

[gjohnsoniv]

You could always add one of the Law Tactical stock adapters.  Only issue would be expense.

[mhmd]

What would the advantage be over a mech tech ccu?

[crossfire]

I have been checking the net, and some of the reviews are not good, when you can find them. I will wait and see how these work out, before buying one. Feeding issue seams to be the big problem.

 

http://arizonashooting.com/v3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=202548

Edited February 17, 2015 by crossfire

[hipower]

Serious question, not acarcasm. So what is the advantage of this over the JRC?

From my limited knowledge, the JRC seems to be a better product. Yes close to 200 higher in cases, but worth it for lesser issues?