What will Michelle give up? R3

[greenego]

[Rightwinger]

If the Dems were all truly as pious and pure as they state they are, then they would all look like Mother Teresa and be living very low cost life styles as their income would be going to take care of these types of issues.

Where is the Obama walk in medical center in Chicago?

The Ted Kennedy alcohol abuse clinic in Massachussets?

The Clinton Sexual Harrasment studies offices?

Habitat for Humanity sponsored by the NAACP in New Orleans?

I think I will stop the small amount of charitable giving I now do since I'm a conservative and must be the DEBIL!

Dems appear to me to be some of the greediest folks on earth and only espouse the policies that keep them in power and money as long as it DOES NOT EFFECT their pocket books.

By the way, Al Gores house in Belle Meade was worked on to lower its carbon footprint and he is now spending even more on his energy costs. Way to go Al......your leadership is commendable.

[strickj]

Did I miss something

She is greedy because she like lobster?

I couldn't give a flying flock what she eats no more then how much McCain spent on her high heels

[Rightwinger]

Yes she is greedy because she eats lobster, tells us all that she isn't proud of this country that she just ate lobster in, tells us those that those who have contributed, paid the most taxes, create the most jobs and EARNED their lobster need to pay more for those not willing to get off their asses and WORK. Yes she is greedy eating lobster when she could be setting the example she preaches by submitting receipts for her CONTRIBUTIONS and then a receipt for the burger with fries or the hot dog and ramen noodles like I had for lunch.

When you preach it and can't live it, your pulpit has no meaning.

I was brought up to believe leadership was by example, not by fiat or keeping the socialistic race war burning. She can bite me.

[Rightwinger]

and it was Palin with the high heels I hope, not McCain. If he's wearing high heels he won't get my vote either.

[Im Neero]

and it was Palin with the high heels I hope, not McCain. If he's wearing high heels he won't get my vote either.

:lol:

[strickj]

Well I dont vote based on what someone had for lunch

Call me silly I guess

and it was Palin with the high heels I hope, not McCain. If he's wearing high heels he won't get my vote either.

I was wondering if anyone would catch that

[Rightwinger]

and apparently are able to look over how their actions vs their platform tell you what type of people they are.

[strickj]

and apparently are able to look over how their actions vs their platform tell you what type of people they are.

How dare they pay that price to eat lobster like that!

What on gods green earth has come of people!

I'm sorry but criticizing someone for what they eat is silly.

I'm sure McCain's camp isn't eating noodles either!

[Rightwinger]

so to win the highest office of the United States, and to at least "appear" to be in touch with the common man, you wouldn't curtail the things that might appear "extravagant"?

I mean one of the first things you see in reference to "rich" is lobster and caviar.

So if your a young person in America planning on voting for "the One" and you had to sell plasma today in order to eat this is okay with you?

They use class warfare as a tool Strick and then have folks like you making statements that it doesn't matter.

Words and actions mean things. Its like the founder of MAD getting a DUI or the directors of AIG going on a junket after getting a bail out check. It just doesn't proof to me your serious about what you saying.

[strickj]

You're a Republican.You hate people telling you what to spend your money on.Tell me again why its ok for you to tell them why they can not spend theirs on lobster.

I just dont see the correlation from lobster,to what they say at a podium.

Maybe if they said for people to stop eating lobster so others could enjoy lobster,then I would see it.

[Rightwinger]

Exactly!

I'm conservative, not republican, but I say folks can keep as much of their hard earned money as possible and spend it as they see fit because I and politcians like me believe in market forces and rugged individualism.

The moment conservatives say we all need to pay our fair share, meaning rich and wealth distribution, that the highest earners should pay more just because they are successful just to pay for programs for the "poor" then that changes the whole dynamic.

Bama, his wife, and his brood of class warriors want to reap the benefit of being rich, but appear benevolent and carrying to the "poor".

You just don't say this is my plan, and I'm doing it all for you, the rich are evil, then settle in for your lobster snack at the hotel.

I have issues with all the Hollywood elite, singers like Madonna and Springsteen, cursing conservatism, cursing Bush and lauding the Democraps and their platform all the while using their bodyguards with weapons, their gas guzzling SUVs in caravan while travleling to the private jet.

Harry Connick Jr strikes me as a fellow who is at least trying to live what he preaches. He has done more for New Orleans than the dem mayor who screamed the Feds did nothing.

Would Dave Ramsey be able to have a show on money mangement if he had the credit cards he so despises and was filing bankruptcy again?

If you see your preacher hanging out at bars and picking up women can you trust what he's preaching!?

Hell, lots of folks get ticked when the cops pass them and you know they are not on the way to an emergency call.

They get away with this crap because no one calls them on it.

Yes, Michelle needs to give up on the expensive crap and live like us eating pork chops and taters if she is saying that someone has to give up their chunk of the pie for universal healthcare.

I have to go to work now Strick so no replies possible until late tomorrow.

You have a nice day, and have some lobster and caviar for dinner. Your allowed. You aren't running for office stating America's top producers need to give up theirs!

[greenego]

I really don't care what Michelle had for lunch, as long as we are not paying for it. The point is they, like all of the elite believe in "do as I say not as I do". They believe "someone" is going to have to give up something (they wiill take it) so they can give it to someone else. Who is the someone and who are the benefactors? Spreed the wealth brother! We are in deep dodo.

Edited October 26, 2008 by greenego

[Metalhead]

Let me be the first (maybe not) to say that, unfortunately, I'd rather look at Hillary for the next 4 years than that woman. Not because of food, but for...well..er..nm.

[Guest db99wj]

Michelle Obama is a terrorist, she supports terrorist nations: Iranian osetra caviar!

[greenego]

I told a friend today if the only choices were Obama or Hillary I would vote Hillary and then:cry:

[Guest eyebedam]

Yeah she could def be the poster child for a angry black woman.

[Mike.357]

If you see your preacher hanging out at bars and picking up women can you trust what he's preaching!?

didn't Jesus and his posse drink and also run with a known prostitute?

Who cares what Mrs. Obama had for lunch. Their lackeys are picking up the tab.

Travelling all the time is no posh life. I imagine she and the boss are on the road constantly, nothing wrong with a little lobster reward.

While her Marxist hubby wants to re-arrange wealth a little he is not saying that the wealthy still can't be wealthy and act wealthy. He just wants them to give up some of their excess (excess according to him) to the people who will not work or take care of their own. The Obamas are fairly well off and will always be that way even if they give up some of their extra cash. Face it, poor people do not go to live in the white house.

I tell you I am sick of the whole mess, can't wait til it is over with. Then they can get on with whatever is going to happen. There is little to nothing a voter in TN can do about it anyway. This state will go republican anyway.