Your Second Ammendment - Bill Whittle

[JPS]

Just excellent.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOwy9OWfnAM&feature=youtu.be

[mikegideon]

Bill always knocks it out of the park

[RED333]

Good stuff, we need more blades of grass.

[94user]

Bill always knocks it out of the park

He gives out the facts in a way that is beyond the intelligence of most people I know. He should have his own TV  hour. He blows the doors off of the likes of Hannity, Limaugh, Huckaby, et all. The way he tackles the issues we face might wake more people up. I'd love to see more folk like him spreading the word of truth.

[justinjr21]

Thanks for that. Now I have another channel that I subscribed too. If Piers would of kept his mouth shut long enough this guy would of made a great person to debate him.

[rugerla1]

Loved it!

[K191145]

It's not that some people can't understand the simple language and meaning of the 2nd Amendment, they simply refused to because they don't agree with what our founding fathers wrote and believed in. I don't have a college degree but it's obvious to me who "The People" are what the 2nd Amendment affirms, the 2nd Amendment couldn't have been more simple and straight forward. Most of these "progressives" have built a fortress around them and will not allow any other idea or thought to enter no matter what it is. These so-called "progressives" should really be called "Regressives" because their ideals and philosophy isn't progressive, the same ideals and philosophy have'nt changed since the beginning of written history. The philosophy that only a certain number of elitists will rule and judge the masses, the peasants have no decision how they live their lives because the ruling elitists only have the intellect to determine what's best for them. Those progressive ideals have been around since the Pharaohs of Egypt, the Romans, the bolshevik revolution, the third reich and now modern socialism which isn't modern.

Edited October 25, 2014 by K191145

[timcalhoun]

It's a great video, but it's even more simple than that. 

 

First and foremost we know who Madison was, what he thought, and believed. 

 

Second, they can't have it both ways. "The People" was used in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 9th and 10th amendment. So, does freedom of speech belong only to the state government? Or should only members of the state government be secure in their persons, house papers etc? That of course would be absurd. The 10th is the one that really kills their argument as it refers to both the state and "The People".

 

Clearly that side relies on a uneducated, misinformed electorate. 

[A.J. Holst]

These brilliant men had such command of the written English language that they were able to write with such clarity of meaning. It applied not only to their time but for the future, regardless of the advances in technology.

It can get sticky when you consider what some of our technology can do... Edited October 26, 2014 by Gotthegoods

[timcalhoun]

The philosophy of liberty is not contingent upon technology. EVER  :usa:

Edited October 26, 2014 by timcalhoun

[Grand Torino]

Any moron should be able to understand that the way it was presented. Unfortunately......I'm not sure any anti-gunners even qualify as morons. :rolleyes: