Proud owner of a Ruger LC9s.

[Will Carry]

I traded my DB380 plus some cash for a LC9S striker fired. The trigger is great, it beats my Glock 19 by a mile. Why Ruger came out with the LC9 hammer fired I'll never know. I own one of those too. This LC9s is what they should have made and it makes this a great little pistol, if it shoots as flawlessly as the LC9 hammer fired. When I have a chance to shoot it, I'll post a range report.

[atlas3025]

Hope to pick one up this weekend.  I dried fired one at Bud's, and I agree, its a much better trigger!  Its really as light as I would want on a pocket gun.

[Will Carry]

My LC9 (hammer fired) has eaten everything from +P loads to cheap target ammo. It has never failed from the first shot. I have gotten to the point when someone tells me a pistol is "ammo sensitive" I back away. Diamondback told me that about the DB380. They said I need to shoot quality ammo. I'm lucky to find any 380 ammo and I have to take what I can get.

For the LC9, I have a N8Squared holster, a Cross Breed Supertuck and a cheap Uncle MIke's. The N8Squared is the most comfortable and the Uncle MIke's works great too. The Super Tuck is the best though.

Edited September 12, 2014 by Will Carry

[BigK]

Kudos on the LC9s. I haven't handled one, but it sounds like the perfect pocket carry package.

[TNWNGR]

Glad you like the LC9s, my experiences with the KT PF9 & R LC9 failed to generate confidence in either. This is rather odd to as I am very pleased with my R SR 22 & LCP. I would be happier with a drop in metal "guiderails" module though. 

[Troutburger]

I've been happy with my lc9s. Only 2 issues. The long trigger reset just a learning curve. When pocket carrying in a sleeve type holster, I have managed to release the mag a couple times.