Gutting Our Military

[Erik88]

....................... 

Edited August 4, 2014 by Erik88

[Sidewinder]

Let me readjust my tinfoil hat and ask a question. I'm not trying to be argumentative...I've never heard any media news people as him what he meant when he said this..."We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." I'd just like to know what he meant by it.

 

Also, I'd like to know what the attack on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon...and they had hoped for the White House, is called? Was it an invasion...was it a terrorist attack...is an invasion a terrorist attack...is a terrorist attack an invasion...would the devastation have been any greater if they had been wearing uniforms? It would seem we're not safe from enemies foreign or domestic. Remember the attack on the USS Cole? Our military gets attacked...our innocent civilians get attacked...but we need to save money! Money that will pay welfare checks in millions, if not billions of dollars, to people sitting in Dearborn Michigan, that not only refuse to speak our language, but refuse to obey our Constitutional laws, and want to kill us and rule the world. And, we're supposed to be the smart ones! That's like fattening up the lion, before he kills and eats you! What's money when your country is done, and you're either dead or shopping at Wal-Mart for a prayer rug! JMHO

[DaveTN]

"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." I'd just like to know what he meant by it.

Homeland Security
Thousands of more jobs he can lay claim to that serve no real purpose.