Jump to content

Open carry advocates prompt Chipotle posting


Recommended Posts

Posted
Now Chipotle says guns not allowed. I always liked Chipotle, but now, I will satisfy my burrito cravings elsewhere. Michael Noirot Clarksville, Tennessee Life member National Rifle Association Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

To be fair, Starbucks didn't say guns weren't allowed, they just preferred that you don't open carry.

  • Like 2
Posted

Makes me wonder which side of the issue the "gun owners" were really supporting.   It doesn't take a genius to know that carrying any long gun into a restaurant in Dallas will cause a high profile reaction, particularly if you have it well planned.   I see a lot of potential "news value" for the anti-gun folks if they staged this.  I can't see much upside for a pro-open carry event at a business that already allows firearms on the property.

  • Like 4
Posted

And let's also note that it was some guy open carrying a rifle that pushed this issue to where it is.  Just because you legally have the right to do something doesn't make it a good idea.  Stay under the radar and CC and there are usually no issues.  Come in and show our ass declaring your rights and more business will respond by declaring their right to post their business.

  • Like 5
Posted

And Chipotle only posted after some open carry yahoos thought carrying AR's to eat would look cool.

Beat me to it, must have been typing at the same time.

Posted
Yeah, I really wish the OC activists would use some common sense. They really aren't helping us right now.
  • Like 3
Posted

To be fair, Starbucks didn't say guns weren't allowed, they just preferred that you don't open carry.

 

And Starbucks employees have been instructed to ignore it if you do open carry, so it is obvious that they only made their statement to get the Brady and Moms crowd to shut their pie holes.

Posted
It was totally asinine for the guys to open carry ARs into Chipotle. I am not opposed to open carry. I can do it in TN. However, I only do it on the range. With the OC crowd trying to make a point this way, it is inevitable that more businesses will follow suit. Hopefully Chipotle will follow Starbucks' lead and not actually post signs. Michael Noirot Clarksville, Tennessee Life member National Rifle Association Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

at least now if someone asks me if I have ever been to a Chipotle I can give them a reason as to why not other than just shrugging my shoulders and say burritos aren't on my food radar.

 

And I am sure criminals will honor their no guns signage.

  • Like 1
Posted

You know, although I don't think it is appropriate in all situations, open carry of a handgun is one thing and I can kind of see that side of the debae.  Strapping on a long gun to go eat a taco is just stupidity, no debate needed.

  • Like 7
Posted (edited)

Makes me wonder which side of the issue the "gun owners" were really supporting.   It doesn't take a genius to know that carrying any long gun into a restaurant in Dallas will cause a high profile reaction, particularly if you have it well planned.   I see a lot of potential "news value" for the anti-gun folks if they staged this.  I can't see much upside for a pro-open carry event at a business that already allows firearms on the property.

 

I wonder the same thing when I read of incidences such as this.  Intentional or not, jackholes like this have the potential to do more damage to the actual practice of firearms carry than Bloomberg and all his ilk, combined.

 

Do I support a person's right to carry for self defense?  Of course.  Do I support some attention-seeking asshat's 'right' to walk around with an AR or AK strapped to him, enter a private business which has nothing to do with firearms and has previously not interfered with the ability to carry in their establishment - with the result that they end up ruining things for those of us who try to have a little common damn sense?  Not just no but hell, no.  To me, these particular attention whores are even worse than he-who-shall-not-be-named because at least his activities (the ones of which I am aware, anyhow) took place on public property and not in a private business.

Edited by JAB
Posted
It remains to be seen as to whether or not they post their restaurants. Unless they do, I'll keep carrying concealed there.
Posted
[quote name="daddyo" post="1150540" timestamp="1400603112"]It remains to be seen as to whether or not they post their restaurants. Unless they do, I'll keep carrying concealed there.[/quote] Agreed. I do the same at Starbucks. I've yet to see one posted. Michael Noirot Clarksville, Tennessee Life member National Rifle Association Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

I wonder if Tweedledum and Tweedledee aren't really anti gun shills?

 

Yeah, I don't know what scares me more; the idea that anti-gunners may be using 'plants' to damage firearms rights or the idea that these dumbasses might really think they are doing something good for firearms rights.  Of course, there is a third option that is just as likely.  It is entirely possible that they and others like them are a simply a bunch of attention whores who have attached themselves to 'gun rights' like a cluster of barnacles.

Edited by JAB
  • Like 6
Posted

I fully support the right to open carry, but I really wish these guys would stop doing this.

Me too. What do you do about jerks like this?

  • Like 1
Posted

I am all for the right to carry as I carry (Concealed 100% of the time) and do have my opinions on open carry. There may be a time when open carry is reasonable and accepted but these humans, (using word humans out of respect) are just showing pure and simple utter ignorance. I am quite sure that they don't need to carry Black Guns into a restaurant to have a meal. A simple hand gun would have been far more appropriate for these conditions. As someone else posted it is people like this that help bring Bloomberg's case to the for front of attention...........jmho  

  • Like 1
  • Moderators
Posted

I support open carry. I also support the right of private entities to set their own policies with regard to whom they will serve without any government interference. All that aside, I am having great difficulty squaring my belief in the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) with my desire to buttstroke  these two asshats with their own rifles.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.