Does this mean new regulations for underwear?

[No_0ne]

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/09/22242494-okla-man-accused-of-killing-stepfather-with-atomic-wedgie?lite

Edited January 9, 2014 by No_0ne

[E4 No More]

I don't like restrictions in my underwear. :(

[jtmaze]

Wow a winner already in the most ridiculous death of the year and it is Jan 9. Is there a chance it was self defense? JTM We the People of the United States, in order to form a more Perfect Union......

[RED333]

If ya go commando, you will not have to worry about this.

[E4 No More]

If ya go commando, you will not have to worry about this.

No, you just have to worry about zippers. :(

[BigK]

who wears underwear that stretch that far?

[bersaguy]

you beat me to it BigK.   Not only who would wear it but who would make it?  I think some of that story may be exaggerated because they added blunt force trauma to the charges but I closed my eyes and tried to picture a weggie from my butt around my head and it sounds virtually and impossible feat without underwear tearing at some point but I could be wrong.................jmho  

[Just2Honor]

I can't wait for the new media term--Assualt Underwear

[Glenn]

I call BS. What kind of underwear stretches that far and has elastic strong enough to choke you?

[BigK]

yet another reason to switch to boxer briefs

[NoBanStan]

who wears underwear that stretch that far?

 

THAT WAS MY FIRST THOUGHT!!!!

[Oh Shoot]

I call BS. What kind of underwear stretches that far and has elastic strong enough to choke you?

 

Anything's possible "while drinking together" I guess -- or at least any story is.

 

- OS

[JAB]

who wears underwear that stretch that far?

 

 

you beat me to it BigK.   Not only who would wear it but who would make it?  I think some of that story may be exaggerated because they added blunt force trauma to the charges but I closed my eyes and tried to picture a weggie from my butt around my head and it sounds virtually and impossible feat without underwear tearing at some point but I could be wrong.................jmho  

 

 

I call BS. What kind of underwear stretches that far and has elastic strong enough to choke you?

 

Some of you have obviously never had an uncle who wore his pants pulled up danged near to his armpits.  Seriously, one of my great uncles (maternal grandmother's brother) wore his pants so that the waistband was just about at the bottom of his sternum.  I have seen other guys wear their pants that way, too.  Assuming that their underwear rides just as high, I can easily see such a thing being true.

Edited January 10, 2014 by JAB

[BigK]

Even if I DID pull my pants up to my chest, I wouldn't have my underwear up there too.

 

However, I can see how the kind of guys who WOULD pull their pants up that high might. After all, they've already demonstrated their keen fashion sense with the pants, why stop there?

[Randall53]

Well, Bloomberg probably spent the day organizing Mayors Against Underwear to make sure this type of tragedy NEVER happens again!!!!!

Edited January 10, 2014 by Randall53

[BigK]

Well, Bloomberg probably spent the day organizing Mayors Against Underwear to make sure this type of tragedy NEVER happens again!!!!!

I'm sure that NY will craft a law against high capacity underwear that caps underwear elasticity at 7". Since some citizens already own hi-cap drawers, there'll have to be a buy-back program too. Edited January 11, 2014 by BigK

[Raoul]

Well, Bloomberg probably spent the day organizing Mayors Against Underwear to make sure this type of tragedy NEVER happens again!!!!!

so this group just lets it hang free?

[bersaguy]

To answer the title question of this thread. My guess is if there was going to be a regulation on underwear it would have happened back when the underwear bomber tried to blow up that airplane.............................jmho