Jump to content

State Trooper Observation


Recommended Posts

In the past, I have been quite critical of LEOs in general. Being in a position of authority, I hold them to a higher standard than the general population.

 

I will give credit where credit is due, however. A few weeks back on hwy 109, I saw a trooper helping an older lady change a flat tire. I admire this gentleman, and wish I knew who he was so I could contact his superior and commend him. I hope his spirit catches on within the LEO community. :up:

  • Like 10
Link to comment

For the LEO's, have a question... I rarely seen this happen as well and thought that there may have been a policy in place that they are not allowed to assist with that kind of stuff.  Was my assumption wrong? I figured it had something to do with them being worried about starting to change a tire/help out and get clobbered in the back of the head by someone.

Link to comment

I well remember my mis-spent youth (...20's...) in the golden age of the fast car.  We lived and ran around out in the country right on the knox county, sevier county, blount county line on US 441.  Some of our best buddies and harshest disciplinarians were members of the THP.  They were great men, great lawmen, and all round good guys.

They were, in fact, men you could look to for help when needed and discipline when needed.  It looks like Greg may have run into some of their sons.  Thank You Lord for lettin some of them stay around.

 

leroy

Link to comment

For the LEO's, have a question... I rarely seen this happen as well and thought that there may have been a policy in place that they are not allowed to assist with that kind of stuff.  Was my assumption wrong? I figured it had something to do with them being worried about starting to change a tire/help out and get clobbered in the back of the head by someone.

In many jurisdictions, this is the case.  The issue is not so much an officer safety one, but one of liability.  If a LEO changes a tire and does it wrong, the city/county is responsible.  Back in my law enforcement days, I happened to be in the radio room one morning and answered the non-emergency line.  A guy on the line asked us to come and change his tire and I told him we couldn't do that.  When he got a little snide, I explained that if I came and changed his tire and either stripped the lug nuts or didn't tighten them enough, his wheel came off in traffic, and he was injured in a crash, we would likely be sued.  To that he said, "Yup, you're right.  I probably would."  

When you consider that something as simple as changing a tire can cause damage to the vehicle (such as the wheel falling off, the lugs getting stripped, the jack slipping, the car being jacked up incorrectly, etc.), the fact that cops aren't officially trained on how to change tires, and that law enforcement agencies aren't insured for damage caused by faulty auto repairs, most agencies have gotten away from these sorts of activities.  Same goes for unlocking cars since using the slim-jim or j-hook can damage the lock mechanism, damage the wiring, damage the window mechanism, damage the window seals, scratch the car's finish, or break the window, departments have stopped doing it or require the caller to sign a waiver of liability form.   Instead, officers generally do a "motorist assist" where they call a wrecker company, car unlocking company, or one of the highway assistance vehicles that cruise the highways.

Edited by East_TN_Patriot
Link to comment

In many jurisdictions, this is the case.  The issue is not so much an officer safety one, but one of liability.  If a LEO changes a tire and does it wrong, the city/county is responsible.  Back in my law enforcement days, I happened to be in the radio room one morning and answered the non-emergency line.  A guy on the line asked us to come and change his tire and I told him we couldn't do that.  When he got a little snide, I explained that if I came and changed his tire and either stripped the lug nuts or didn't tighten them enough, his wheel came off in traffic, and he was injured in a crash, we would likely be sued.  To that he said, "Yup, you're right.  I probably would."  

When you consider that something as simple as changing a tire can cause damage to the vehicle (such as the wheel falling off, the lugs getting stripped, the jack slipping, the car being jacked up incorrectly, etc.), the fact that cops aren't officially trained on how to change tires, and that law enforcement agencies aren't insured for damage caused by faulty auto repairs, most agencies have gotten away from these sorts of activities.  Same goes for unlocking cars since using the slim-jim or j-hook can damage the lock mechanism, damage the wiring, damage the window mechanism, damage the window seals, scratch the car's finish, or break the window, departments have stopped doing it or require the caller to sign a waiver of liability form.   Instead, officers generally do a "motorist assist" where they call a wrecker company, car unlocking company, or one of the highway assistance vehicles that cruise the highways.

 

You are exactly correct.  About a month ago my 78 year old mother locked herself out of the car while she was in north Alabama.  She called the police and asked if they could send someone to help her.  They refused and told her to call a locksmith.  She was pretty upset, and I had to explain to her that society has become so litigious, that it has forced police officers from doing things that were once commonplace.  It is a shame that dickheads in society who are looking to make a quick and easy buck have ruined it for the rest of us.

Link to comment
While working as a LEO I have always stopped if possible. Obviously being very cautious of legal repercussions. I have bought people many gallons of gas, let them make calls from my cell phone, or given them a ride.
  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.