Jump to content

World War Z - Movie Review


Guest nra37922

Recommended Posts

Posted

I also love the "stuff they didn't include", amongst that list is Iron Maiden, lmao. It caught me off guard and I had to think about where it was in the book, almost had to give myself a facepalm... to myself. -_-

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Seldom do Pay For View, but finally watched it.

 

Very very disappointed. Excepting kudos for CGI and sets, it was just another actioner -- see how many times Brad can narrowly escape death against incredible odds!  Meh2

 

- OS

Posted

Seldom do Pay For View, but finally watched it.

Very very disappointed. Excepting kudos for CGI and sets, it was just another actioner -- see how many times Brad can narrowly escape death against incredible odds! Meh2

- OS


Now watch the Honest Trailer for it. It is better than the movie.
Posted

Now watch the Honest Trailer for it. It is better than the movie.

 

Yep, did, sums it up pretty well. Really.

 

Just doubly sad if you've read the book, Max really sold out, but guess I can't blame him making a wad on something that started mostly as a hoot.

 

- OS

Posted

Yep, did, sums it up pretty well. Really.

Just doubly sad if you've read the book, Max really sold out, but guess I can't blame him making a wad on something that started mostly as a hoot.

- OS


I really enjoyed the book. I was having this conversation with a bud the other day who hadn't read the book but just watched the movie. He liked the flick, and I suppose I would have been okay with it had I not read the book first. It wasn't that the movie was a poor adaptation, it was that it didnt adapt anything at all from the book other than the title. This was the big disappointment I think, since expectations were that it would follow the book. I'm holding out hope that they decide to do a sequel and at least include stuff from the actual Zombie war, since this movie only covers the outbreak. Surely they wouldn't title a movie "World War Z" and not actually show the war.... right?
Posted

I really enjoyed the book. I was having this conversation with a bud the other day who hadn't read the book but just watched the movie. He liked the flick, and I suppose I would have been okay with it had I not read the book first. It wasn't that the movie was a poor adaptation, it was that it didnt adapt anything at all from the book other than the title. This was the big disappointment I think, since expectations were that it would follow the book. I'm holding out hope that they decide to do a sequel and at least include stuff from the actual Zombie war, since this movie only covers the outbreak. Surely they wouldn't title a movie "World War Z" and not actually show the war.... right?

 

We are in total agreement on this. Very poor rendition of the book. Pretty much an adaptation of the Outbreak and Contagion movie stories. At least that's the way it seemed to me.

 

Yep the CGI work was pretty good. At least I think so. It was all run at such speed that I found it difficult to really appreciate it.

 

One, of several, things that puzzled me in the movie though was the scene with the C130(?) taking off from the carrier. Maybe I'm wrong, but that seems a little far-fetched. 

Posted

We are in total agreement on this. Very poor rendition of the book. Pretty much an adaptation of the Outbreak and Contagion movie stories. At least that's the way it seemed to me.

 

Yep the CGI work was pretty good. At least I think so. It was all run at such speed that I found it difficult to really appreciate it.

 

One, of several, things that puzzled me in the movie though was the scene with the C130(?) taking off from the carrier. Maybe I'm wrong, but that seems a little far-fetched. 

 

JATO!

Posted

JATO!

 

Thought of those assist rockets, unfortunately after I posed this.

 

Now how did it get on the carrier in the first place? Seems like even with hooks and arrestor line it would be too large.

 

I know, I'm trying to assign reality to fiction.

Posted

Lol, so you accept the Zombie apoc, but get tripped up on the logistics? 

 

Look, as bad as an adaptation as WWZ was, it was still an entertaining action movie.  If you want to talk about blowing an adaptation, read, then see, Starship Troopers.

  • Like 1
Posted

Lol, so you accept the Zombie apoc, but get tripped up on the logistics? 
 
Look, as bad as an adaptation as WWZ was, it was still an entertaining action movie.  If you want to talk about blowing an adaptation, read, then see, Starship Troopers.


Hey, so I'm weird. It's the little things that make it enjoyable and "believable".

Totally agree with you on Starship Troopers. One of RAH"S better novels made into a joke actually.

But still watchable, if just to drool over the weaponry.
Posted

Hey, so I'm weird. It's the little things that make it enjoyable and "believable".

Totally agree with you on Starship Troopers. One of RAH"S better novels made into a joke actually.

But still watchable, if just to drool over the weaponry.


I drool over Dizzy's boobs. Best part of the movie, twice.
Posted

I drool over Dizzy's boobs. Best part of the movie, twice.


In the book, Dizzy doesn't make it much past the first page...and is a dude.
Posted

I drool over Dizzy's boobs. Best part of the movie, twice.

 
 

Agreed.



Erik88/TMF you perverts. Besides which, they are too small, droopy, and floppy. But she is a cute little bit of video fluff.
 
 

In the book, Dizzy doesn't make it much past the first page...and is a dude.

Yep. That's why I didn't go there. Still a good read though. Gonna have to put it on my re-read list, behind I-don't-know-how-many I still haven't read yet.

Posted

Thought of those assist rockets, unfortunately after I posed this.

Now how did it get on the carrier in the first place? Seems like even with hooks and arrestor line it would be too large.

I know, I'm trying to assign reality to fiction.


It could be done. I wouldn't want to be in it, but it couldn't be much worse than a "assault" or "combat" landing. Having worked on aircraft carriers and around c-130z it wouldnt be as bad as you might think with good pilots and a well balanced planed



Tapatalk ate my spelling.

Posted




Erik88/TMF you perverts. Besides which, they are too small, droopy, and floppy. But she is a cute little bit of video fluff.



I don't discriminate against sporty boobs. They were nice. Liked hers better than the other chick with the giant fake ones.
Posted

I don't discriminate against sporty boobs. They were nice. Liked hers better than the other chick with the giant fake ones.


I do have to admit that Denise Richards may have gone a bit too far, but still rather like her. But that's the wonder of all shapes and sizes.
Posted

It could be done. I wouldn't want to be in it, but it couldn't be much worse than a "assault" or "combat" landing. Having worked on aircraft carriers and around c-130z it wouldnt be as bad as you might think with good pilots and a well balanced planed



Tapatalk ate my spelling.


Wow. Thanks, Spots. Wouldn't have thought it possible. But if it could be done one the Forrestal, I guess it would be easier on the newer generation carriers.

Thanks for the video link. And btw, I really enjoy taking them to wherever else they might lead. You get to see some really interesting things that might otherwise be missed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.