This is something the MSM isn't reporting. Glad WSJ did!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

A different spin on all the current gun legislation. It's something the MSM wouldn't

dare admit to. Wrong message.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324883604578398843653264474.html#project%3DGUNSTATES20130404%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive

[Trekbike]

I know you can't paste the article, but can you give a summary? The link comes up and gives you the first sentence and then asks you to log in or subscribe to read more.

[MarkInNashville]

I know you can't paste the article, but can you give a summary? The link comes up and gives you the first sentence and then asks you to log in or subscribe to read more.

It logged in fine for me. I am using Firefox as my browser (in case that matters).

 

Interesting! I am going to need to look this over when I can spend more time with it! Thanks, 6.8!

[piercedan]

I know you can't paste the article, but can you give a summary? The link comes up and gives you the first sentence and then asks you to log in or subscribe to read more.

 

Do you get a few tabs that say - Article - Graphic - Comments?

 

If so, click the Graphic tab.

[ShamGlock]

From what I read on that graph I would call the measures being taken by Utah, Wyoming, Arkansas, and Mississippi fairly reasonable. I know they are listed as strengthening gun control in those states but I almost see them as a wash. Which really just leaves NY, CO, and CT on that side of the equation. 

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Basically, it's an article showing there are more guns rights being passed nationwide, compared to the gun control queer

laws.

 

Hmm, what browser?

[Trekbike]

I get the tabs for the article/video/graphics/comments.  The video and graphic tabs are the only ones I can see the info.   The article tab wants me to subscribe to see the article. 

 

Same results with IE, Chrome, Firefox.

[Raoul]

Sounds like you've reached your maximum free views of the site.

[mikegideon]

A different spin on all the current gun legislation. It's something the MSM wouldn't

dare admit to. Wrong message.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324883604578398843653264474.html#project%3DGUNSTATES20130404%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive

 

Like I said yesterday, the line is getting thicker. Sooner or later, we'll have prisoner exchanges between red and blue states.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

That's a good one, Mike. Probably true, too. :D

[piercedan]

I get the tabs for the article/video/graphics/comments. The video and graphic tabs are the only ones I can see the info. The article tab wants me to subscribe to see the article.

Same results with IE, Chrome, Firefox.

The story is the graphic. Do you see the maps and a spreadsheet below?

[Chief07]

Like I said yesterday, the line is getting thicker. Sooner or later, we'll have prisoner exchanges between red and blue states.

We need to put a sign on 81 coming into Tennessee.

"You are now entering the free sector of America"  :pleased:  :pleased:

[mikegideon]

We need to put a sign on 81 coming into Tennessee.

"You are now entering the free sector of America"  :pleased:  :pleased:

 

How about, "ATTENTION LIBERALS: Do not enter unless you have a purty mouth"

[JRWnTN]

Read the print version at the office today.  It reported that permit holder could have a gun on their employers' property, even if the employer objected.  The story did not point out that the employer could fire the employer.