Jump to content

Help Identify These Shells


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Can anyone identify these shells or have any input to give.   Thank You

  th_1dfa8202-0189-4437-9a69-41037267c952_        th_DVC00084_zps60b53ea9.jpgth_DVC00086_zps0dc58df9.jpgth_DVC00085_zps8a7e6811.jpg

 

Some extra info   1st shell  2.2" OAL     1.62" Length of Brass Dia. of bullet .60"  O/S Dia. of brass .610"  Bottom Rim Dia.  .735"

                            2nd       2.25" OAL     1.55" "           "     "      "            "      .425"  "     "   bottom brass .550"  Neck Dia. .440  Bottom rim Dia. .610"

                            3rd        2.60  OAL     2.0"    "           "     "      "           "       .450  "     "      "         "        .570    "       "      .450    "          "     "    .660   Rim Fire H on the bottom

Edited by smokin45
  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

the third one looks like a 30-30 --- making the first one a 44 mag?  This is a best guess after zooming in to see numbers on the tape measure.

 

Making the middle --- I have no idea, its not a tokerev, its too big.  hmm.

Edited by Jonnin
Posted

Good call! 41 Swiss Vetterli?

 

 

Good call! 41 Swiss Vetterli?

I have no clue. I just don't see a primer or pin which makes me think rimfire. Your guess is as good as mine.

Posted (edited)

#1 is a toss up between a 577 Snyder and a 58 U.S. Berdan Musket.

 

#2 11x52R aka 43 Beaumont.

 

#3 I'm sticking with 41 Swiss Veterli.

 

These are still all guesses at some really old, odd stuff.

Edited by gregintenn
Posted

#1 is a toss up between a 577 Snyder and a 58 U.S. Berdan Musket.

 

#2 11x52R aka 43 Beaumont.

 

#3 I'm sticking with 41 Swiss Veterli.

 

These are still all guesses at some really old, odd stuff.

I think the mystery is solved  Thanks to all with your input.  #1 is a 58 us Berdan as observed on ammo-0ne.com   The 58 is a straight wall and the 577 is slightly tapered.

                                                                                             #2 is as you have stated and observed in ammo-one

                                                                                            #3  is also as stated and observed on ammo-one

I beliveve untill proven wrong that these are correct    Thanks again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.