Nevada ACLU backs SCOTUS

[Guest nraforlife]

State affiliate bucks national stance, supporting the right to bear arms.

The Nevada American Civil Liberties Union has declared its support for an individual's right to bear arms, apparently making it the first state affiliate in the nation to buck the national organization's position on the Second Amendment.

The state board of directors reached the decision this month after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the rights of individuals to own handguns.

"The Nevada ACLU respects the individual's right to bear arms subject to constitutionally permissible regulations," a statement on the organization's Web site said. "The ACLU of Nevada will defend this right as it defends other constitutional rights."

But the state affiliate's position puts it at odds with the national organization.

The New York City-based ACLU disagrees with the Supreme Court ruling, saying in a statement that it interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right to own guns and not an individual one.

"In our view, neither the possession of guns nor the regulation of guns raises a civil liberties issue," according to the position on its Web page.

Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, said the decision was not political, nor a slap at the national organization. He said the ACLU of Nevada often defends both conservative and liberal groups when, in its view, a constitutional right is being violated.

The national ACLU, in a statement by a spokeswoman, said, "ACLU affiliates are free to take positions that differ from those of the national office."

The spokeswoman said she was unaware of any other ACLU affiliate that had taken a differing position on the Second Amendment.

----------------------------------

Anyone know what TN's ACLU chapter is saying?

[Guest Len]

Not surprising. The ACLU national agenda is greatly influence by the big money contributors to the national ACLU, thus they often ignore or come down on the wrong side of some civil liberties issues, such as the 2A.

State-level chapters are usually not so constrained and have boards made up of local members, so you will get a varied political mix. Pure civil libertarians, or those who support all 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights, would be wise to look at the activities of their state-level ACLU and donate accordingly. Oftentimes, the state organization will be more politically palatable and more in keeping with the original mission of the ACLU (to protect the Bill of Rights) than the national org.

The TN chapter has nothing on its website on the Heller decision.

(http://www.aclu-tn.org/)

State affiliate bucks national stance, supporting the right to bear arms.

The Nevada American Civil Liberties Union has declared its support for an individual's right to bear arms, apparently making it the first state affiliate in the nation to buck the national organization's position on the Second Amendment.

The state board of directors reached the decision this month after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the rights of individuals to own handguns.

"The Nevada ACLU respects the individual's right to bear arms subject to constitutionally permissible regulations," a statement on the organization's Web site said. "The ACLU of Nevada will defend this right as it defends other constitutional rights."

But the state affiliate's position puts it at odds with the national organization.

The New York City-based ACLU disagrees with the Supreme Court ruling, saying in a statement that it interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right to own guns and not an individual one.

"In our view, neither the possession of guns nor the regulation of guns raises a civil liberties issue," according to the position on its Web page.

Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada, said the decision was not political, nor a slap at the national organization. He said the ACLU of Nevada often defends both conservative and liberal groups when, in its view, a constitutional right is being violated.

The national ACLU, in a statement by a spokeswoman, said, "ACLU affiliates are free to take positions that differ from those of the national office."

The spokeswoman said she was unaware of any other ACLU affiliate that had taken a differing position on the Second Amendment.

----------------------------------

Anyone know what TN's ACLU chapter is saying?

[DaveTN]

The New York City-based ACLU disagrees with the Supreme Court ruling, saying in a statement that it interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right to own guns and not an individual one.

That is stupid at face value. Regardless what you believe about the second amendment or what it meant; the SCOTUS has ruled. The SCOTUS are the keepers of the Constitution. If you are going to make Constitutional arguments one of them can not be that the SCOTUS is wrong.

[Guest CJRogue]

If you are going to make Constitutional arguments one of them can not be that the SCOTUS is wrong.

I dunno. If SCOTUS had screwed this up I'd be for making the Constitutional argument that they screwed up the Heller deal.