Jump to content

Has Zimmerman Waived His Right to a Pre-Trial "Stand-Your-Ground" Hearing?

Guest Law of Self Defense

By Guest Law of Self Defense
in 2A Legislation and Politics

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 630
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mikegideon
mikegideon

I'm fine with what Andrew is bringing to the party. He is certainly providing a lot better info than the clown show on TV. 

JohnC
JohnC

All I got to say is they better pick the jury right or he's screwed.   You go out of here and on other forums not related to guns and listen to how folks view this case and you'll see what I mean.

mikegideon
mikegideon

I never use that feature. You never know when you may want to stop ignoring for a few seconds and throw a good punch :)

DaveS Postus Maximus

DaveS

Posted
Posted

WOW what, DAVES???

 

Is your post supposed to mean anything or are you just trying to insinuate something but not wanting to come out and say it (lest someone point it out later when you change your story)?

Doesn't mean a thing. I just can't beleive it's all women! That's pretty odd. 

 

DS

Link to comment
RobertNashville Postus Maximus

RobertNashville

Posted
Posted

You guys are some of the most on un-friendiest people I know . Dang guys!!! Refer to post 108 by Robert if you have any questions!  What don't you understand about the word "profiling".


Well, I know you've left the thread but I can't help but ask anyway, really DAVES? We are unfriendly? You come in and make assertions with nothing to back them up and then when people question you about them you either ignore the question and/or accuse us of of being mean or not being smart enough to understand.


For those of you who are wandering what post No. 108 says; it says....
 

You can change your personal preferences. Near the upper RIGHT corner, left click on your screename, which will open a dialogue box...look to the right; second from the bottom and select "Manage Ignore Prefs". That will open a new page; near the bottom you can add any member's screename and select what you want to ignore. Keep in mind; this is not like Facebook where you don't see a "blocked" person at all but you can at least not see posts you don't want to see.


I'm not sure why someone wanting to know how to ignore another forum member's posts or telling Andrew how to change his ignore preferences in the forum to accomplish that is some sort of insult to DAVES. :shrug:

 

I've got quite a few people on my ignore list and I'm sure I'm on quite a few lists of others; we have the feature in the forum software to use, don't we???. :eek: 


 

Ya'll win...I'm not going to waiste another minute of my time on you people! The same old "suspects" have ruined TGO...I'm outta here.

Who see that coming?

Link to comment
DaveS Postus Maximus

DaveS

Posted
Posted

Robert; I made assertions that Zman profiled TM by his behaiver ect., go back and read the 911 log. Look at what Zman says about trayvon. I've decided that you or anyone else (outside a moderator maybe) is not going to run me off TGO as so many others have left. Some people on here thrive on throwing people under the bus and can't stand the fact that some opinions differ than others, and don't fit some peoples agendas. It seems that no one can have an opinion WITHOUT PROOF other than a few selected individuals here. I am smart enough not to bring a gun to a fist fight! I'm not the one on trial here!

 

I'm only trying to have a decent converstion here, but that seems way to hard for some people. If I sided with Zman...ya'll would be fine with that! But no...

 

Dave S

  • Like 1
Link to comment
mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted

Robert; I made assertions that Zman profiled TM by his behaiver ect., go back and read the 911 log. Look at what Zman says about trayvon. I've decided that you or anyone else (outside a moderator maybe) is not going to run me off TGO as so many others have left. Some people on here thrive on throwing people under the bus and can't stand the fact that some opinions differ than others, and don't fit some peoples agendas. It seems that no one can have an opinion WITHOUT PROOF other than a few selected individuals here. I am smart enough not to bring a gun to a fist fight! I'm not the one on trial here!

 

I'm only trying to have a decent converstion here, but that seems way to hard for some people. If I sided with Zman...ya'll would be fine with that! But no...

 

Dave S

 

We're all friends here, WD. Nobody wants to run anybody off. you may not have noticed, but this bunch likes to argue :)

Link to comment
RobertNashville Postus Maximus

RobertNashville

Posted
Posted (edited)

Once again, here is the unedited post you erased...
 

Ya'll win...I'm not going to waiste another minute of my time on you people! The same old "suspects" have ruined TGO...I'm outta here.


 

Now you say...
 

Robert; I made assertions that Zman profiled TM by his behaiver ect., go back and read the 911 log. Look at what Zman says about trayvon. I've decided that you or anyone else (outside a moderator maybe) is not going to run me off TGO as so many others have left. Some people on here thrive on throwing people under the bus and can't stand the fact that some opinions differ than others, and don't fit some peoples agendas. It seems that no one can have an opinion WITHOUT PROOF other than a few selected individuals here. I am smart enough not to bring a gun to a fist fight! I'm not the one on trial here!

I'm only trying to have a decent converstion here, but that seems way to hard for some people. If I sided with Zman...ya'll would be fine with that! But no...


:rofl:  No one was "running you off" except yourself, DAVES; just like you've left (and usually came back) in in other threads.   :rofl:

If you really want to have a "decent conversation" then you might want to refrain form making unsupported assertions; or if you make them, don't get your nickers twisted just because someone questions your basis for them.

 

And why do you lay into me about "profiling" and saying I should go back and read the 911 log...I've not engaged in your back and forth about profiling at all...maybe you should make your argument to those who were engaged in that discussion..

Speaking of unsupported assertions; who are all these "many others who have left" TGO?

Edited by RobertNashville
Link to comment
DaveS Postus Maximus

DaveS

Posted
Posted

Well the jury selection looks good for Zimmerman.  When was the last time youve heard of 6 women locked in a room together agreeing on anything.   :)

 

Sorry couldnt help myself.

You got that right!!! 

 

DS

Link to comment
RobertNashville Postus Maximus

RobertNashville

Posted
Posted (edited)

I bet you will....but no cigar!


Remember when I said that if you want to have a "decent discussion" you might want to not make unsupported assertions or ignore questions about them???

I'm still waiting :waiting: for an answer to this assertion...
 

Speaking of unsupported assertions; who are all these "many others who have left" TGO?

 
I'm sure you wouldn't say something like that and not have some data to back it up, right?
 
Or how about an answer to this question from last night...

Why would anything he [Tracy Martin (Trayvon's dad)] has to say be either interesting or, more importantly, relevant?

Edited by RobertNashville
Link to comment
BigK Postus Maximus

BigK

Posted
Posted
I see the all female jury as bad for GZ, since the prosecution will play to their protective motherly instincts about an innocent kid being assassinated.

If that fails, the fact that most of the jury is white, will be the linchpin used by Sharpton and them, if he's found not guilty.
Link to comment
RobertNashville Postus Maximus

RobertNashville

Posted
Posted

I see the all female jury as bad for GZ, since the prosecution will play to their protective motherly instincts about an innocent kid being assassinated.

If that fails, the fact that most of the jury is white, will be the linchpin used by Sharpton and them, if he's found not guilty.

 

Just so I understand...it's your opinion that because these jurors are women, they cannot reach a fair and impartial verdict based on the facts of the case?

Is that really the story you want to stick to???? ;)

Link to comment
Links2k Postus Maximus

Links2k

Posted
Posted (edited)

I see the all female jury as bad for GZ, since the prosecution will play to their protective motherly instincts about an innocent kid being assassinated.
If that fails, the fact that most of the jury is white, will be the linchpin used by Sharpton and them, if he's found not guilty.

Edited by LINKS2K
Link to comment
BigK Postus Maximus

BigK

Posted
Posted (edited)

Just so I understand...it's your opinion that because these jurors are women, they cannot reach a fair and impartial verdict based on the facts of the case?
Is that really the story you want to stick to???? ;)


Don't be ridiculous! Of course not.

I'm just saying that all things being equal, a woman might be more likely to find an emotional connection that the prosecution may try to capitalize on.

Jeez, lighten up, Francis. Edited by BigK
  • Like 1
Link to comment
QuietDan Prolific Contributor

QuietDan

Posted
Posted

Don't be ridiculous! Of course not.

I'm just saying that all things being equal, a woman might be more likely to find an emotional connection that the prosecution may try to capitalize on.

Jeez, lighten up, Francis.

 

Women may respond to the fact that Zimmerman was actively working to protect his family, his neighbors and his neighborhood.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing

TGO HELPFUL LINKS

Outside of TGO...

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.