So, how does the health care get delivered when it runs out?

[Guest 6.8 AR]

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b2bce37c-7644-11e2-8eb6-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2LLXs4KLq

 

When companies decide to pay the penalty in lieu of premiums for your health care, how do you think your

health care will be paid? That policy that will cost you $20,000 a year will cost how much the next year? How

many of those unemployed will help out? How many of those welfare recipients do you want on your back,

along with the union employee, policeman, fireman, city council member, neighbor and your dog, who will

eventually be paid for because the vet will probably get a lobby to include his fees?

 

I wonder how long this law will take to bankrupt our country? I'm still scratching my head over how this was

even passed since it's not the federal government's authority to enact legislation that isn't within their scope.

[mav]

I could be mistaken, but I believe the intent of the law was to make healthcare so unaffordable that only the people who could afford it are the ones with enough money that they don't need it.  Congress in all its wisdom then comes to the rescue and institutes single payer to lower insurance costs.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Effectively, yep! The other only effect was to ruin an otherwise innovative healthcare system in order to make people

who don't make a paycheck to vote for more welfare. Never made any other kind of sense, but that's why no one read

it before they voted on it.

[hipower]

Sadly, I totally agree. My wife and I have talked about this very issue. Considering my past health issues, she is determined to work as long as possible to maintain her coverage for us.

 

Her thoughts are that the medical fields will be one that will hold out the longest. I'm not sure I agree with that though.

Edited February 19, 2013 by hipower

[1gewehr]

This is a perfect example of 'government is a disease masquerading ass it's own cure'.

 

The intent is to cause all private health providers to become government resources.  When you are dependent on a government bureaucrat to decide whether you or your loved ones can get needed treatment, then you will be much more likely to go along with losing other liberties.

 

Just like gun control, it's not about guns or doctors, it's about 'control'.

[KaNuckles]

How dare you question Obamacare!!! It doesn't matter if all the lies the Tea Party told about it turned out to be true!!! They're still lies!!! How could we pass it if you knew what was in it?!?!?! 

 

^^^ That is literally every argument made by liberals since we've began finding out what's in the ACA.

Edited February 28, 2013 by KaNuckles

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Sadly, I totally agree. My wife and I have talked about this very issue. Considering my past health issues, she is determined to work as long as possible to maintain her coverage for us.

 

Her thoughts are that the medical fields will be one that will hold out the longest. I'm not sure I agree with that though.

I doubt they hold out any better than anything else. The only way they would is if money keeps on being printed, and we know

what that leads to. That bill is going to collapse by it's own weight, and bring down the rest of the economy with it. It was designed

by utopian fools decades ago who had no use for capitalism, which was their only goal. Kill it.

 

Another fine example where liberalism equals death.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Look at all the ridicule Sarah Palin got for mentioning a phrase like "death panels", which is exactly what it is.

[KaNuckles]

"I do think at a certain point you've made enough money"

 

Apparently that applies to how long you live, too.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8lwg-NMWjE&feature=player_embedded

Edited February 19, 2013 by 6.8 AR