Very good 2A Article from the WSJ

[ShamGlock]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323951904578290460073953432.html

 

 

Succinct, clear, to the point. I like it. It is probably one of the best pieces out of the MSM I have read so far. 

[Dolomite_supafly]

They are starting to see a new target audience and have, hopefully, begun leaning that way to get more revenue. It is all about money to a business but as long as they are reporting articles like this it will help others lean our way as well. Who knows maybe after a few other newpapers and media outlets see how successful this is they will do the same.

 

I am going to write the WSJ and let them know I appreciate the article. If we don't let them know they will only hear from the other side.

 

Dolomite

[gjohnsoniv]

The WSJ usually does a pretty good job on their articles regardless of the subject. At least they try to argue both sides instead of just one.

[Randall53]

That picture does not prove a thing. We all know there are $50 computer programs that could have created that photograph.  Obama could have shot a gun in the basement of the WH and a 12 year old computer whiz could have put him in the middle of Disneyland shooting it. That was the point to an email I got that had 12 different pictures of Obama shooting that shotgun. Heck, in one, he was holding it backwards!!!!  I LMAO at that one.  It looked just as real as the original.

 

Edited to say that the WSJ has had some very good articles.  They are getting closer to being impartial that most other MSM.

Edited February 12, 2013 by Randall53