Parents required to notify school officials of gun ownership.

[Raoul]

Read all about it.

[CQB Elite]

"Resident Logan Hennecke tells the station that he thinks it's "a very smart choice" for parents and schools to know which students have access to firearms...."

 

Its none of their damn business! That's labeling a child and is no different than if we segregated children that have a parent that is HIV positive or is schizophrenic.

[Steelharp]

Home school, folks. We did it.

[TMF]

It's already a crime to allow your kids access to a firearm if they used said firearm illegally. Soooo, not sure what they are accomplishing with that part of the bill. I mean, I fully support legislation which stiffens the penalty for criminally negligent parents who don't secure their firearms and let their thug kids use them for crime.

As to the other part, well I'd like to see how they intend to enforce that part. That is getting into 4th Amendment territory. What else is the government going to require that I admit to legally possessing under threat of criminal penalty? I don't see that getting by a challenge from a first year lawyer. Edited January 25, 2013 by TMF

[bronco302]

Did you notice the one introducing the bill is upset because teens in her district are using their so called parents guns and used them in robberies, murders, and carjackings?

[TMF]

I'm really curious as to what decision it drives if the school district knows that you own guns. What are they supposed to do with that information to mitigate a crime? Really curious to know that. I had no idea they tolerated this type of nonsense in Missouri. Edited January 25, 2013 by TMF

[bronco302]

Hopefully when it comes to a vote She will get a good smack down.

[glock55]

sounds like a camouflaged gun registration to me. looks like the new stratgey of anti gun politicians is to do on the local level what they cant do on the national level.

 

by the way is there a spell check function here. my wife's patience is wearing thin with me calling asking how to spell. the question is for me not anyone else 

Edited January 25, 2013 by glock55

[creeky]

While I don't think this will pass... it is the direction "they" are going.

They want to treat gun owners like Jews in Nazi Germany. Dehumanize gun owners, shame us, redefine us not as Americans but as some sinister type of radical element, unstable, ect.

 

You watch, we have already seen the names of Pistol Permit holders published in New York and now Rham is pressing banks to put pressure on Gun makers to help back gun control measures. This is what bullies do.

 

Before long they will start putting pressure on insurance companies and health companies to make things hard for individual gun owners.

They aren't dumb... they will attack our rights from every angle.

[mikegideon]

Another damn Democrat. Next.

 

I hope average folks are taking note of these idiots.

[Guest ThePunisher]

[quote name="mikegideon" post="895636" timestamp="1359132141"]Another damn Democrat. Next.   I hope average folks are taking note of these idiots.[/quote] It was the "average folks" that voted for these idiots.

[mikegideon]

It was the "average folks" that voted for these idiots.

 

But, the Dems are doing a lot better job of showing their true colors these days.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

"I am not trying to take away the guns rights of any parents or any other citizens. I believe in the Second Amendment,"

Bald faced lie. The nanny state in action.

[Guest ThePunisher]

[quote name="mikegideon" post="895645" timestamp="1359132684"]But, the Dems are doing a lot better job of showing their true colors these days.[/quote] PINK, as in pinko commies.

[TMF]

Do you have alcohol in the house? What are your political affiliations? Any porn? What gas mileage do your vehicles get? What religion do you teach to your child? Any of those questions could be rationalized into a relevant question from the school under the same pretense they're peddling. Considering that 1/3 of these parents are gun owners, I'm figuring there are at least one or two that will make a very big deal out of this if it passes, which it probably won't.

[Dolomite_supafly]

I'm really curious as to what decision it drives if the school district knows that you own guns. What are they supposed to do with that information to mitigate a crime? Really curious to know that. I had no idea they tolerated this type of nonsense in Missouri.

 

They are going to use it to profile the kids whose parents own guns and then treat those kids differently.

 

Dolomite

[TMF]

[quote name="Dolomite_supafly" post="895670" timestamp="1359133975"]They are going to use it to profile the kids whose parents own guns and then treat those kids differently.   Dolomite[/quote] I'm making the same assumption, but this is the question people should be asking so these commie Democrats will be forced to answer.

[Tempest455]

NOYFB!

[bronco302]

by the way is there a spell check function here. 

Edited January 26, 2013 by bronco302

[KJ48]

They are going to use it to profile the kids whose parents own guns and then treat those kids differently.

 

Dolomite

 

Dont worry, I'm sure the ACLU will be all over it lol.

[johnboy]

NOYFB!

Exactly!

[Caster]

Tell them to shove it up their.......................................

[TMF]

NOYFB!

If that law passes, a response such as yours would be a crime. I thought I wouldn't see the kinda crap I'm seeing in my lifetime. The sooner the better I say. Best to get these cockroaches into the light so everyone can see them for who they are. Edited January 25, 2013 by TMF

[Tempest455]

If that law passes, a response such as yours would be a crime. I thought I wouldn't see the kinda crap I'm seeing in my lifetime. The sooner the better I say. Best to get these cockroaches into the light so everyone can see them for who they are.

 

Trust me, I would be much more eloquent in my response, even though that's what I meant. I'm a certified professional at telling people to go F themselves while remaining tactful. :)

[Caster]

Trust me, I would be much more eloquent in my response, even though that's what I meant. I'm a certified professional at telling people to go F themselves while remaining tactful.  :)

After reading your post, I guess I'd rephrase my response to "Forcibly insert it into your rectum".  Would that be less threatening?