Ever heard of the "Dick Act?"

[Steelharp]

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/dick-act-of-1902

[RED333]

So if I read it correct, was it put into law?

[Steelharp]

This is a link to a 22 page .pdf file: http://www.joebrower.com/RKBA/RKBA_FILES/GOV_DOCS/1982_Congress_RKBA_report.pdf

[Guest 6.8 AR]

No, I have never heard of that, but I assure you I will have a lot of reading to do, now. Thanks for this information!

If I find out what I think, I will be one unhappy puppy.

[Guest The Dude]

Then wouldnt the ATF and NFA restrictions become null and void? I didnt read into the whole thing, but if this is the case, then we have some disbanding to do within our federal agencies. But then again, who am I kiddin. They wont give up their power even if told to do so. They'd have to be forced out. Thanks for the post though! Good find indeed.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

A lot of stuff should be, if that's the case. I'm just wondering if that is actually a law, and a President signed it,

how is it so thrown away? That's an awfully large cover up. If it is actually law, there needs to be more than a

bunch of annulments.

 

There is one thing to remember. The present Congress can't compel  the actions of a future Congress. To

say something can't be repealed won't fly, but it sure does say something about tyranny on the fast track.

Edited December 27, 2012 by 6.8 AR

[m16ty]

A lot of stuff should be, if that's the case. I'm just wondering if that is actually a law, and a President signed it,

how is it so thrown away? That's an awfully large cover up. If it is actually law, there needs to be more than a

bunch of annulments.

 

There is one thing to remember. The present Congress can't compel  the actions of a future Congress. To

say something can't be repealed won't fly, but it sure does say something about tyranny on the fast track.

I agree. If is was passed into law in 1902, why are we just now hearing about it?

 

Even if it is the law of the land, I would suspect the current administration and congress would just ignore it. They don't mind going against the constitution so I don't see why they would care about some obscure law.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

That's true, since it's been ignored for that long.