Presidential Debate tonight - "The Last Call"

[Guest ThePunisher]

Romey is rambling, saying the same thing over and over! He is terrified in loosing!

Obama was babbling same old BS. Are you worried Obama is gonna be dethroned?

Charles Krauthammer says Romney won big.

Edited October 23, 2012 by ThePunisher

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I think Romney did what he needed to do in the debates collectively. He appeared credible and Presidential.

In that regard, the first debate probably mattered more than the other two combined.

I think so, too. This debate was a love fest for the liberal reporters, nothing more.

[mikegideon]

I think Romney did what he needed to do in the debates collectively. He appeared credible and Presidential.

In that regard, the first debate probably mattered more than the other two combined.

This. Romney was there to pass a test. He did.

Tied in poll... Can he handle commander in chief? 60% for both. Success!

[Guest CCI]

Obama was babbling same old BS. Are you worried Obama is gonna be dethroned?

Charles Krauthammer says Romney won big.

Romnet will win! The popular votes, not the electoral votes !

[kieefer]

I was hoping Romney would have taken the gloves/mittens off, he did well but he could have smeared him good like he did his fellow republicans in the primary debates. ( what, no mention of Benghazi?)

I'm happy with him anyway and all three debates. I also voted today and that really felt good.

Looking forward to the landslide.

[mikegideon]

Anybody feel like sending the commie douchebag any money? He needs your help...

This is in your hands now.

Chip in $75 or more, and let's go win:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Tonight

Thanks,

Barack

[Guest TNBrat]

CNN: "There was no clear winner of of Monday's presidential debate, according to a CNN/ORC poll of people who watched"

Update at 1:42am

CNN: Final CNN/ORC post-debate poll: 48% who watched thought Obama won, compared to 40% who thought Romney won.

Edited October 23, 2012 by TNBrat

[kieefer]

CNN: "There was no clear winner of of Monday's presidential debate, according to a CNN/ORC poll of people who watched"

Update at 1:42am

CNN: Final CNN/ORC post-debate poll: 48% who watched thought Obama won, compared to 40% who thought Romney won.

Surprise, surprise.

Polldaddy has Romney beating him by 88%

[laktrash]

I posted this on the other thread but

Obamas expression all nite reminded me of Carl in Slingblade

check it out if you get a chance

Edited October 23, 2012 by laktrash

[mcurrier]

[Guest 6.8 AR]

That's a hoot, Mark!

[Jesse]

I just cant see Obama losing.

[E4 No More]

I just cant see Obama losing.

Open your eyes and rub them.

[mcurrier]

I just cant see Obama losing.

I can't see him NOT losing. It is becoming crystal clear to most people what he really is and what a load of b.s. he sold people back in 2008. I am amazed however that so few people did their homework like many of us did back then and didn't see all of this coming. The information was clearly there. But then I suppose a lot of young people who had never paid attention to politics before then bought his bumper-sticker one liners, and a lot of old people did it to prove that they wren't 'racists'. Add to that the media's 8 years of constant 24/7 pounding of how evil George Bush was and minds were subliminally molded to a pre-configured agenda. That's how we got here. Question is, who wants to stay?

[Jesse]

I know what you're saying, but there's still gonna be millions who vote on race alone. Then you have voters who really don't follow whats going on and will vote on who the media is brandishing.

If this goes down again as a race thing and a popularity contest Obama is gonna win.

[Oh Shoot]

I can't see him NOT losing. It is becoming crystal clear to most people what he really is and what a load of b.s. he sold people back in 2008. ....

While I've always agreed with Mencken about the intelligence of the American public, and given that, I can to a certain extent understand the charismatic win in 08.

But even given that the GOP has again found an exceptionally poor candidate, the fact BHO is still even in the ballpark of being reelected suggests that Mencken himself might well be surprised.

And I still think Hussein will squeak it out. Whether he does or not, we're still going to have a truly divided country, both on The Hill and in general.

- OS

[mikegideon]

While I've always agreed with Mencken about the intelligence of the American public, and given that, I can to a certain extent understand the charismatic win in 08.

But even given that the GOP has again found an exceptionally poor candidate, the fact BHO is still even in the ballpark of being reelected suggests that Mencken himself might well be surprised.

And I still think Hussein will squeak it out. Whether he does or not, we're still going to have a truly divided country, both on The Hill and in general.

- OS

At least that division won't be created by the president. I think Romney is a good candidate, maybe even a great one. Then again, I don't care about vaginas, religion, or any other minutia. I care about the money. I think Romney has that covered much better than most.

[Will H]

I can understand Hussein getting elected in 08, after all he talked a hell of a game. I cannot believe that Americans are actually dumb enough to elect him again. Yeah, I make the same jokes about how dumb we as a society are, but when it comes right down to it I just cannot believe we are THAT stupid.

[Oh Shoot]

.... Yeah, I make the same jokes about how dumb we as a society are, but when it comes right down to it I just cannot believe we are THAT stupid.

Whether he actually wins or not, the fact that he's even money at worst flat disproves your hypothesis.

Seems to me a president shouldn't even have to actually campaign for a second term if he's done a halfway decent job in the first.

- OS

Edited October 23, 2012 by OhShoot

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Gallup and Rasmussen both have Romney at more than even, even with the +or- on their polls. The argument

is skewed if you take the extreme on one and the other way with the other. doesn't make for good math. Too much

of an outlier. Besides, tomorrow will tel which direction it will go for this last debate. I think Romney made good on

it. Obama was too much like Biden:mostly lies, and I think anyone viewing saw through him.

Aah, we'll see. Bet you a nickle.

[mikegideon]

Gallup and Rasmussen both have Romney at more than even, even with the +or- on their polls. The argument

is skewed if you take the extreme on one and the other way with the other. doesn't make for good math. Too much

of an outlier. Besides, tomorrow will tel which direction it will go for this last debate. I think Romney made good on

it. Obama was too much like Biden:mostly lies, and I think anyone viewing saw through him.

Aah, we'll see. Bet you a nickle.

I wouldn't bet big money, but have sent a few donations to the cause. May send one more. I'll pay money to badmouth Obama on TV, 'cause he really deserves it.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

He sure does!

[Oh Shoot]

....Aah, we'll see. Bet you a nickle.

I think that a combination of Mormonism and "let Detroit fail" will be difference enough in Florida and Ohio.

Among that and several other things, I think the major diff will be that the Dem org will manage to get more of the deadheads to the polls in all the swing states.

- OS

[Guest 6.8 AR]

The Dems just might, but I don't think with the zest they did last time. Dems and all the other brands

of commies are losing the public love fest, or guilt, or whatever they had.

C'mon. Nickle says Romney wins with 300+ electorals.

Edited October 23, 2012 by 6.8 AR

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Damn it, I'm going to get you back up right sometime, Mac.

Edited October 23, 2012 by 6.8 AR