Obama's 2016

[willis68]

I just watched this on Pay per view,

This explains so much about our President and should wake up even the most die hard Obama fan and show them how imperative it is that we get him out of office!

[mikegideon]

Yep. Worth seeing. Most are way too brainwashed to watch it.

[dralarms]

Scared the crap out of me.

[mav]

I watched online a week or so ago. It is informative for a lot of people that haven't really looked into Obama's past or have paid close attention to what he has or is currently doing. It is well worth watching.

[Guest travr6]

Romney has signed anti gun legislation. Obama has only ever signed pro gun legislation.

Both men are in agreement on another assault weapons ban.

We are screwed no matter which one wins.

[xRUSTYx]

They need to play this on Fox news for the 2-3 days leading up to the election. Anyone who is/was "wishy-washy" certainly won't be after watching that.

[Oh Shoot]

Romney has signed anti gun legislation. Obama has only ever signed pro gun legislation.

Both men are in agreement on another assault weapons ban.

We are screwed no matter which one wins.

Remember your opinion in 20 years when the full power of BHO's Supreme Court has had its effect.

- OS

Edited October 21, 2012 by OhShoot

[willis68]

Romney has signed anti gun legislation. Obama has only ever signed pro gun legislation.

Both men are in agreement on another assault weapons ban.

We are screwed no matter which one wins.

If you watched the same debate that I did, Romney said he will not change the Laws, Osama said he would re instate the AR band

Believe me when I say that this Idiot we have in office is doing everything he can to make our country a 3rd world and give our super power status away, sadly Gun control is not the only thing about BHO that scares the ever living crap out of me

[Slasher]

Remember your opinion in 20 years when the full power of BHO's Supreme Court has had its effect.

- OS

Exactly, this is the most important reason to get him out now and not give him another four years!

[Dolomite_supafly]

Obama also mentioned "cheap" handguns. I suspect his ban will not only be assault weapons but also handguns.

I bet he will do it using executive order and by the time it is figured out in the courts the damage will have already been done. If he used a EO to make possession of a prohibited item against the law and even if it was later overturned those convicted of it will still remain in jail because they broke the law at the time it was a law. Also, the guns taken will have been destroyed so there will no guns to get back when it gets overturned in the courts. He is that much of a bully to do it.

And think he can't do it, no one thought that protesting around the secret service agents would be a felony but now it is.

Dolomite

[Garufa]

If you watched the same debate that I did, Romney said he will not change the Laws,...

In the debate that I saw Romney admitted to signing an AW ban after the pro 2A crowd and anti's agreed on what was acceptable in MA. He seemed to be bragging again on his ability to bring both sides together. That always means someone loses. Guess who that usually is?

Edited October 21, 2012 by Garufa

[RobertNashville]

Remember your opinion in 20 years when the full power of BHO's Supreme Court has had its effect.

- OS

Nice try but I think we all just have to accept that there are some people out there who just don't want to see it that way....anybody who wants to ignore Obama's voting record on gun related issues while in Illinois, not to mention what he has said he wants to do, is obviously someone who doesn't want to be confused by the facts.

I've looked at his nine posts, other than a couple, they all take some kind of swipe are Romney and/or promote Ron Paul...I may be wrong and if so I apologize but it looks to me like he's just a frustrated Paulbot.

Edited October 21, 2012 by RobertNashville

[Guest HillyKarma]

I'm too young to vote, and I don't care for either, but dammit, my ethics will not let me support a draft-dodging trust fund baby.

Some people say that voting for a third party because of the candidate is a waste of a vote, which may be true,

but voting for someone just because they're republican or democrat, and not because of the candidate themselves?

That's a waste of a country.

[RobertNashville]

I'm too young to vote, and I don't care for either, but dammit, my ethics will not let me support a draft-dodging trust fund baby.

Some people say that voting for a third party because of the candidate is a waste of a vote, which may be true,

but voting for someone just because they're republican or democrat, and not because of the candidate themselves?

That's a waste of a country.

For most people, it has nothing to do with "Party"; it has to do with removing a dangerous, inept, America-hating socialist with delusions of godhood from the Presidency...a man who WILL do whatever he has to do to install his agenda (and his agenda is anathema to everything this country is supposed to be).

Have you watched the video this thread is about? If you haven't then I encourage you to do so.

Edited October 21, 2012 by RobertNashville

[mikegideon]

For most people, it has nothing to do with "Party"; it has to do with removing a dangerous, inept, America-hating socialist with delusions of godhood from the Presidency...a man who WILL do whatever he has to do to install his agenda (and his agenda is anathema to everything this country is supposed to be).

Have you watched the video this thread is about? If you haven't then I encourage you to do so.

Party is in there in a pretty big way. There are only two organizations that can drag up the billion dollar entry fee. I happen to like Romney, and really dislike Obama. With that said, I would vote Republican if the candidates were faceless. The Democrats, as a party, need to go away for a good while.

[willis68]

In the debate that I saw Romney admitted to signing an AW ban after the pro 2A crowd and anti's agreed on what was acceptable in MA. He seemed to be bragging again on his ability to bring both sides together. That always means someone loses. Guess who that usually is?

I agree with you and he is not by a long shot my first choice, but please if you have not watched this video and see what Obama is all about, the Gun control issues are the last things that scare about me about this man

[mikegideon]

Yep. It's a revealing film, even if you ignore the speculation. Lots of well researched facts.

[runco]

Party is in there in a pretty big way. There are only two organizations that can drag up the billion dollar entry fee. I happen to like Romney, and really dislike Obama. With that said, I would vote Republican if the candidates were faceless. The Democrats, as a party, need to go away for a good while.

This!!! I have always voted republican. I only struggle with the primaries, never the general. I dont care if Diane Feinstein switched parties, and was the R nominee, I would vote R. However in the primary I wouldn't have voted for her.

[Moped]

Remember your opinion in 20 years when the full power of BHO's Supreme Court has had its effect.

- OS

It's the only reason I am voting for Romney and not Johnson, this election. We can not afford for Obama to place anymore of his nominees on the SC.

[mikegideon]

It's the only reason I am voting for Romney and not Johnson, this election. We can not afford for Obama to place anymore of his nominees on the SC.

:clap:

[Moped]

This!!! I have always voted republican. I only struggle with the primaries, never the general. I dont care if Diane Feinstein switched parties, and was the R nominee, I would vote R. However in the primary I wouldn't have voted for her.

This I will not do. I will look at each candidate and vote for the one that best represents my beliefs. No party should ever take my vote for granted. I have been known to vote for a democrat or two and I did not vote for either John McCain or Obama in the last election. Rather for Bob Barr, who was on the Libertarian ticket. I will vote for Mitt this time, because I think it's very important to maintain a conservative Supreme Court. Otherwise I don:t really care for him.

And the only election I would vote for Feinstein in, would be in the election to kiss my butt. Same goes for Pelosi, and Rush Limbaugh.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Damn! Putting Rush in the category as Pelosi is a tad radical.

[Garufa]

Especially since that pill-popping windbag has never held office.

[S&WForty]

Damn! Putting Rush in the category as Pelosi is a tad radical.

Yep. I don't know where we'd be had Rush not come along and blazed a trail many have followed. So many critical elections have been won by razor thin margins. Without his impact, we probably would have lost a lot of races.

[K191145]

It's the only reason I am voting for Romney and not Johnson, this election. We can not afford for Obama to place anymore of his nominees on the SC.

+1

This should say alot also.

http://times247.com/articles/obama-receives-endorsements-from-three-dictators