Jump to content

Presidential Debate


R_Bert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it just me or has Obama beat around the bush and avoided answering almost every question?

Seems they both did to some extent. Especially the question regarding AK-47s.

Dave S

Posted

There are reports that the lady who asked the job equality question is the media coordinator for Code Pink.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Posted

There are reports that the lady who asked the job equality question is the media coordinator for Code Pink.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

I do not doubt this when I heard they were holding a town hall and all questions have been pre picked I figured that something like this was gonna happen.

Guest ArmyVeteran37214
Posted (edited)

Did anyone catch that the Green Party Candidate was arrested while protesting her exclusion from this debate. http://www.washingto...de-debate-site/

It's time that more than just two voices be heard from in these debates. I'm sick of hearing both R and O lie. Hell, they won't even talk about the real issues this country is facing.

Edited by ArmyVeteran37214
Posted

I thought it was hilarious that Romney tried to downplay signing the AWB, claiming that pro-gun people got together with anti's and "this is what they wanted".

Why not just admit he made a mistake and reassure us it won't happen again? That would have earned my respect. He should have also pointed out what Obama said about the violence in Chicago. Here is a prime example of a city with the strictest gun control plagued by violence. He passed up a great opportunity there.

Oh well, I guess it's better to have someone in office that MIGHT sign another AWB instead of someone who undoubtedly WILL sign an AWB.

Dude, really? Romney clearly stated that he saw no need for further legislation. Come on!
Posted
Dude, really? Romney clearly stated that he saw no need for further legislation. Come on!

In such a politically correct setting, with manufactured public perceptions about guns, that statement is huge. He has a spine.

Posted

I thought it was hilarious that Romney tried to downplay signing the AWB, claiming that pro-gun people got together with anti's and "this is what they wanted".

Why not just admit he made a mistake and reassure us it won't happen again? That would have earned my respect. He should have also pointed out what Obama said about the violence in Chicago. Here is a prime example of a city with the strictest gun control plagued by violence. He passed up a great opportunity there.

Oh well, I guess it's better to have someone in office that MIGHT sign another AWB instead of someone who undoubtedly WILL sign an AWB.

Everything I have been able to find on that issue says Romney was telling the truth. You need to dig into it more.

Posted

Did anyone catch that the Green Party Candidate was arrested while protesting her exclusion from this debate. http://www.washingto...de-debate-site/

It's time that more than just two voices be heard from in these debates. I'm sick of hearing both R and O lie. Hell, they won't even talk about the real issues this country is facing.

It's time that a third voice amassed enough following to be heard first. Ross Perot is about the only one that's ever done that. BTW... Ross endorsed Romney yesterday.

Posted

It's time that a third voice amassed enough following to be heard first. Ross Perot is about the only one that's ever done that. BTW... Ross endorsed Romney yesterday.

Ironic, since a few weeks ago Perot said neither one is good for the country.
  • Moderators
Posted

It's time that a third voice amassed enough following to be heard first. Ross Perot is about the only one that's ever done that. BTW... Ross endorsed Romney yesterday.

The only reason Perot was able to get the amount of attention he did was because he was allowed into the debates. The CPD was formed afterwards by the R & D to fix that problem. Any candidate who is on enough state ballots to numerically win the election should be included in the debates.

Posted

The only reason Perot was able to get the amount of attention he did was because he was allowed into the debates. The CPD was formed afterwards by the R & D to fix that problem. Any candidate who is on enough state ballots to numerically win the election should be included in the debates.

Even if they don't show in the polls? Perot got 19% of the vote in his first run. He was a REAL candidate.

Posted

I can call her fat because SHE'S fat.

Exactly.

That fat bitch is obviously pro Obama . I can call her fat because I am fat

No, that's not correct. That's like saying only black people can call 0bama an idiot or only black people can use the so-called "n" word. Doesn't work that way. An idiot is an idiot, a fat person is fat, etc.

Posted

Romney is a dick! A cult member!

In his world, he is use to getting his way! He wants it his way and that's all there is too it!

He is in for a rude awaking! He won't get his way in Washington! Washington is not one of his companies!

  • Moderators
Posted

Even if they don't show in the polls? Perot got 19% of the vote in his first run. He was a REAL candidate.

Yes, even if they don't show in the polls. The reasoning begin that being having them in a debate with the R and the D gives a clearer picture of the other choices and shows how little difference there really is between the R and D. Both the Libertarian and Green parties would pull significant numbers away from the R&D if given equal access in what is now a rigged debate structure controlled by the R&D parties.

  • Like 1
Posted

Everything I have been able to find on that issue says Romney was telling the truth. You need to dig into it more.

Really Mike? You are really going to defend Romney's signing of the AWB? I would love to know who these "pro-gun" people are that supported this. I don't know many on here who would.

So let me get this straight. If Obama gets together next year with a group of pro gun and anti-gun folks and they reinstate an AWB you will defend his actions?

The kool-aid must be good.

Again, I'm willing to move past Romney signing the ban, I'm just stating he should have been a man and admitted he made a mistake instead of trying to claim this is something pro-gun people wanted.

Posted

Yes, even if they don't show in the polls. The reasoning begin that being having them in a debate with the R and the D gives a clearer picture of the other choices and shows how little difference there really is between the R and D. Both the Libertarian and Green parties would pull significant numbers away from the R&D if given equal access in what is now a rigged debate structure controlled by the R&D parties.

... and you should be able to tell jokes on the Leno show because I like you? You need more friends :)

Posted

Really Mike? You are really going to defend Romney's signing of the AWB? I would love to know who these "pro-gun" people are that supported this. I don't know many on here who would.

So let me get this straight. If Obama gets together next year with a group of pro gun and anti-gun folks and they reinstate an AWB you will defend his actions?

The kool-aid must be good.

Again, I'm willing to move past Romney signing the ban, I'm just stating he should have been a man and admitted he made a mistake instead of trying to claim this is something pro-gun people wanted.

Stop spewing opinions without doing your homework.

Posted

Romney is a dick! A cult member!

In his world, he is use to getting his way! He wants it his way and that's all there is too it!

He is in for a rude awaking! He won't get his way in Washington! Washington is not one of his companies!

That does it! I'm changing my vote to Obama. He is dreamy and all

Posted

Dude, really? Romney clearly stated that he saw no need for further legislation. Come on!

I have a bridge in Mexico I'd like to sell to you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.