4 More of Barrack Hussein Obama

[Guest 270win]

What do you think four more years of Obama will be like? I imagine there will be more companies that will be bought out by the fed government, like what happened to GM. The economy will still be stagnant in much of the country and the Fed Reserve will keep on inflating our money.

[Glenn]

I think what is left of America as I have known it will be gone. True socialism, many more businesses taken over by the Gov. no guns, and runaway inflation. I also expect a rise in social unrest. It ain't gonna be pretty.

[mikegideon]

I think it will just be 4 more years of gridlock. He's not a dictator (yet). There's still a congress. I'm more concerned about the missed opportunity to grow the economy.

[greenego]

I think it will just be 4 more years of gridlock. He's not a dictator (yet). There's still a congress. I'm more concerned about the missed opportunity to grow the economy.

In addition to this, I believe gun control will be enacted. If not by law by executive order. We will continue to lose ground over seas. The only thing worst than his domestic policies are the foreign ones.

[JAB]

What do you think four more years of Obama will be like?

Honestly, about like four years of Romney. I see both of them as politicians more interested in tuning up their fiddles than actually preventing the fire.

[RobertNashville]

By both his words and his actions, BHO has shown that he truly has no respect for the greatness of America or of its people; that he has total disdain for the Constitution and, for that matter all other laws that would prevent him from doing whatever he wants to do to complete his work of transforming America. He is clueless about what makes our economy works and perhaps even more cluelesabout foreign policy.

Therefore, I believe four more years of BHO will result in a complete collapse of our currency and, as a result, a collapse of our economy...as goes the U.S. so will go the world economy and we will enter a period of financial pain that we have nothing to even compare to except, perhaps, 1930's Germany.

The right of free speech, free thought, expression of religion will be replaced by censorship and laws forbidding us from saying or doing anything that might offend others, especially if the others are muslims.

Our border control, such as it is, will be abandoned as we open the country to anyone who makes it across the border with the promise of amnesty, jobs and public assistance so those who still actually want to work will have trouble finding jobs because there will be dozens of illegals ready to do the same work for pennies...thoughts of our country being a sovereign nation will be discouraged as old fashioned, even dangerous to be replaced by global rules and ideals of "fairness" and "justice".

BHO will have to do something about firearms in the hands of civilians as he knows that is the biggest threat to him. I don't know what he'll do or how he'll do it but I've no doubt that he will do all he can to make civilian firearm ownership difficult or impossible. I would think he'll probably get laws passed for the sake of the "children" and based on a campaign that an "assault weapon" and high-capacity magazine has no legitimate "sporting purpose".

I see civil unrest and crime becoming out of control as those who lose all hope will look to the government and the "evil rich" to feed, cloth and house them as well as provide medical care and entertainment and they won't get those things because the bankrupt and inept government will not be able to provide those things; they won't be able to "tax the rich" because anyone who truly is rich will likely have moved out of the country or found other ways to protect their lifestyles; just like I would if I had the resources to do so.

The only hope of stemming the bleeding will be a Congress with some balls and some common sense but I've seen little reason to expect we'll get that (I hope I'm wrong)...we had a really good crop of conservative legislators elected two years ago and they have failed to actually DO anything to stop the financial bleeding so, if BHO is re-elected; and with a complacent or impotent Congress; we have little reason to hope for anything good in our future.

Most of my disrepair is centered with what I believe is, with a second BHO term, the certain collapse of our economy.

History is pretty clear; when a democracy goes down the road we are on (printing worthless money and monetizing its debt so that it can keep handing out money it doesn't have) it has never ended well - every time, such a democracy has collapsed it's been followed by civil unrest and chaos and then, to restore order, a dictator.

I don't know if having Romney as President instead of BHO will stop the collapse but I am deadly certain that a continuation of BHO's policies will bring the collapse.

Edited September 20, 2012 by RobertNashville

[Erik88]

I think what is left of America as I have known it will be gone. True socialism, many more businesses taken over by the Gov. no guns, and runaway inflation. I also expect a rise in social unrest. It ain't gonna be pretty.

Glenn, I'm sorry but that's all a pretty big stretch.

[Jonnin]

What would it be like? Same as now, high unemployment, union bailouts, handouts for the liberals with a constant push to make everyone else poor and in need of said handouts to get them hooked and wanting to vote D. Extended unemployment benefits. More taxes on the Republicans ("the rich", supposedly). More environwhacko regulations to drive business out of the USA (some folks calls it green jobs, I calls it regulation). More executive orders. At least 1 more radical libtard on the SCOTUS. More healthcare. More borrowing money to give to our enemies as aid. More of the same, in other words.

[Guest 270win]

I was hoping that the big pipeline from Canada would be built to Oklahoma, but I guess that won't be happening anytime soon. That would have been an opportunity for Obama to cater to the unions and give the workers jobs on the pipeline.

What is sad is that the day is over for the conservative democrat. The Democratic party has been mostly replaced by idealists, progressive activists, liberals, anti gun.

Reagan messed up by granting amnesty to all the illegals in the 80's, never strengthening the southern border. Who did he think all the illegals would eventually vote for when they became citizens. Not Republicans. Big Mistake. Who would ever think that Reagan would come out of California?

Edited September 20, 2012 by 270win

[Guest BungieCord]

This isn't gridlock, this is the express lane to statism.

Congress didn't stop him nationalizing the home loan industry. Or nationalizing Government Motors and giving it to his old pals in the UAW. Or appointing 32 "Czars," who are unelected and unaccountable and effectively cabinet-level officials. Or ordering INS to stand down on deporting of illegal aliens, directly contravening standing law. Or suing the State of Arizona to prevent them enforcing federal law. Or allowing DoJ to ignore polling place intimidation of white voters by black terrorists. Or violating separation of powers by enacting new gun laws (requiring border states gun dealers to report multiple same-day rifle sales) by Executive Order (of Obama's 923 EOs to date, more than half create entirely new powers for POTUS or clearly contravene the Constitution of the United States of America). And by publicly bullying the SCOTUS. I can't begin to count all the extra-constitutional crap he's done to promote the new Green Religion, to include giving billions in taxpayer dollars to fiscally unsound "Green" companies, stifling the petroleum industry and actively seeking to shut down the coal industry.

What's coming after the election will make your hair stand on end. General amnesty for all illegal aliens by EO (= 15 million new registered Democrats, possibly leading to a constitutional convention to attempt the repeal of the 22nd Amendment). A new EO will instruct the FBI to add a requirement for positive proof of mental competence from a government-approved mental health professional to the NICS checks for a BATFE Form 4473. And more new EOs to drive all private health insurers out of business, make it a felony not to have Obamacare. And because gun violence drives up ER costs, the government will refuse to "sell" Obamacare to anyone who can't prove they do not own firearms.

I'm only getting started but I have to get back to work and pay taxes so six more welfare recipients can bay their cable TV bills.

4 More of Barrack Hussein Obama = 4 Years to Gulag Amerkia

[RobertNashville]

I was hoping that the big pipeline from Canada would be built to Oklahoma, but I guess that won't be happening anytime soon. That would have been an opportunity for Obama to cater to the unions and give the workers jobs on the pipeline.

What is sad is that the day is over for the conservative democrat. The Democratic party has been mostly replaced by idealists, progressive activists, liberals, anti gun.

Reagan messed up by granting amnesty to all the illegals in the 80's, never strengthening the southern border. Who did he think all the illegals would eventually vote for when they became citizens. Not Republicans. Big Mistake. Who would ever think that Reagan would come out of California?

While I wish he hadn't done it, Reagan's actual mistake in granting amnesty was believing Tip O'Neil/Congress when he was promised that with the amnesty would come true border control...it didn't happen and so we got (and are getting) millions more illegals.

[1pointofview]

I shudder to think about 4 more years of Obama. But people talking g about romney being just as bad are off base. Romney may not be who you want him to be but he is not Obama. But even if romney is elected, unless we start cleaning house in congress we will not be much better off either way. Half of our problems are coming from congress and the other half from wh

[E4 No More]

I don't think O-numbnuts could do too much unless the Dums win the house majority too. Executive orders can't sign away the constitution until the Dums get a majority in the SC. I think trying to do so would invite a civil war rather quickly.

[RobertNashville]

I shudder to think about 4 more years of Obama. But people talking g about romney being just as bad are off base. Romney may not be who you want him to be but he is not Obama. But even if romney is elected, unless we start cleaning house in congress we will not be much better off either way. Half of our problems are coming from congress and the other half from wh

Most of the people disparaging and marginalizing Romney are those who are angry that their candidate (mostly Paul supporters) didn't win the nomination.

Badmouthing Romney is a defense mechanism.

Edited September 20, 2012 by RobertNashville

[RobertNashville]

I don't think O-numbnuts could do too much unless the Dums win the house majority too. Executive orders can't sign away the constitution until the Dums get a majority in the SC. I think trying to do so would invite a civil war rather quickly.

Would that be the same SC that just upheld Obamacare and the law forcing people to buy a product whether they want it or not?

Obama, with executive orders has already signed away the Constitution and existing laws numerous times.

[E4 No More]

Would that be the same SC that just upheld Obamacare and the law forcing people to buy a product whether they want it or not?

Obama, with executive orders has already signed away the Constitution and existing laws numerous times.

You must admit that no one saw that one coming: therefore, it's a fluke. Adding someone that you know is liberal is staking the deck in your favor. IMHO, making people pay for insurance does not rank up there with declaring the 2nd null and void.

[sigmtnman]

Most of the people disparaging and marginalizing Romney are those who are angry that their candidate (mostly Paul supporters) didn't win the nomination.

Badmouthing Romney is a defense mechanism.

Help me to understand these statements...

Most of the people disparaging and marginalizing Romney would be Democrats. Are you saying democrats were supporters of Dr. Paul?

Also how do you figure that making factual statements about one person has anything to do with a third party and how exactly would it be a defense mechanism?

Edited September 20, 2012 by sigmtnman

[mikegideon]

Help me to understand these statements...

Most of the people disparaging and marginalizing Romney would be Democrats. Are you saying democrats were supporters of Dr. Paul?

Also how do you figure that making factual statements about one person has anything to do with a third party and how exactly would it be a defense mechanism?

I think Robert is talking about our friends and allies on this board that won't place an effective vote against Obama because they don't like Romney. In other words... shooting themselves in the ass with their own Glock.

[RobertNashville]

Help me to understand these statements...

Most of the people disparaging and marginalizing Romney would be Democrats. Are you saying democrats were supporters of Dr. Paul?

Also how do you figure that making factual statements about one person has anything to do with a third party and how exactly would it be a defense mechanism?

In the post I was replying to, I was specifically replying to the statement of "people talking about Romney being just as bad are off base too"; "people" meaning people HERE on TGO who, in thread after thread, have been saying Romney is "as bad" as or no different than BHO (often followed with their claim that they are going to vote for Gary Johnson or Paul or some other third-party candidate or even not vote at all).

Such folks are not (or certainly not likely to be) Democrats/BHO supporters - if they are, saying that the opposition candidate is "as bad" as their candidate would be a pretty strange thing to say.

Edited September 20, 2012 by RobertNashville

[E4 No More]

I think Robert is talking about our friends and allies on this board that won't place an effective vote against Obama because they don't like Romney. In other words... shooting themselves in the ass with their own Glock.

[RobertNashville]

You must admit that no one saw that one coming: therefore, it's a fluke. Adding someone that you know is liberal is staking the deck in your favor. IMHO, making people pay for insurance does not rank up there with declaring the 2nd null and void.

Whether anyone saw it coming or not, it indicates that the current supreme court is not averse to ignoring the Constitution and trampling on individual rights.

I didn't say that being forced to buy insurance is "as bad" as declaring the 2A null and void but I am sure that BHO is perfectly willing to ignore any "right" that interferes with his plans.

Edited September 20, 2012 by RobertNashville

[RobertNashville]

I think Robert is talking about our friends and allies on this board that won't place an effective vote against Obama because they don't like Romney. In other words... shooting themselves in the ass with their own Glock.

As usual, you demonstrate a talent for getting to the heart of the matter.

[E4 No More]

Whether anyone saw it coming or not, it indicates that the current supreme court is not averse to ignoring the Constitution and trampling on individual rights.

I didn't say that being forced to buy insurance is "as bad" as declaring the 2A null and void but I am sure that BHO is perfectly willing to ignore any "right" that interferes with his plans.

I didn't say that you did, and I'll leave it at that, Robert. I'm sure you are right about BHO, but far more people would be fighting mad over infringement of their 2nd than they are over having to buy insurance. Edited September 20, 2012 by SWJewellTN

[Guest 270win]

I don't particularly care for Romney, but I think he was the most electible out of all the primary candidates. There is hope that maybe Romney and his VP can get some northern swing states with big populations.

If Obama is re elected I don't think he can just ban guns with the makeup of Congress. I think he'd like to, but he just can't without Congress. Many democrats in rural areas are not going to vote for it in addition to most republicans. AR 15's are now sold at WAL MART of all places! More and more people are interested in firearms.

I am most concerned about the economy being slow and the Supreme Court if Obama is re elected.

[Guest ThePunisher]

Initially the Democratic sheeple will be elated with Obama victory followed by buyers remorse following higher energy costs as well as higher auto gas prices due to stupid green energy policy, higher food prices and food shortages, inflation as well as hyperinflation, stagflation, disInflation, or just plain ole economic collapse. More reduction and confiscation of personal wealth, higher interest rates, higher taxes, higher healthcare premiums and costs with reduction of Medicare benefits to the elderly, loss of income and higher unemployment, and more foreclosures of homes.

Obama declaring himself dictator. Gun control and most likely efforts of gun confiscation, followed by social unrest and rioting, imprisonment of Obama dissenters in the newly built DHS Fema camps, and killing of people with all those billions of DHS hollow point ammo orders. More liberal appointments to SC, and more trampling of the Constitution, and loss of liberties and freedoms by executive order.

Weakening of the military with military budget cuts, embolding America's enemies. More Obama bowing to foreign leaders and threatening our national security by continued borrowing money to the point where the US will not be able to pay back interest much less the principle. In summary, the country is screwed.

Edited September 21, 2012 by ThePunisher