Pawlenty leaves Romney campaign

[Oh Shoot]

Here you go...

http://www.daytondai...es-in-oh/nRDqC/

Yep, in TN, free cell phone if you are on any of these proggies:

Medicaid

Food Stamps '

Federal Public Housing Assistance (Section 8)

Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Low Income Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)

National School Lunch's FREE Lunch Program (NSL)

Or income, which starts at $15,080 for single person household

Number of phones and minutes varies by number in household. Minimum is 250 minutes and 250 text messages.

And just like the gummit's recruiting for food stamps, you don't have to look for these offers. I get one every month or so since I live in a complex where at least half the folks probably receive Section 8, so we get carpet bomb mail for all this sort of stuff.

- OS

Edited September 30, 2012 by OhShoot

[strickj]

OK. You win. I'm voting for Obama. Those monkeys scare me to death

Naa... Really not trying to sway anyone at all.

I just like pointing out to those that voted for Romney how stupid their choice was.

[kieefer]

Naa... Really not trying to sway anyone at all.

I just like pointing out to those that voted for Romney how stupid their choice was.

You'll probably find that many on here didn't vote for Romney, since the majority of the population did vote for him instead of our guy, he's just the one we are once again stuck with.

[mikegideon]

Naa... Really not trying to sway anyone at all.

I just like pointing out to those that voted for Romney how stupid their choice was.

[Guest ThePunisher]

Naa... Really not trying to sway anyone at all.

I just like pointing out to those that voted for Romney how stupid their choice was.

And would you say that those that voted for Obama were even more stupid or even brain dead?

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Win, lose or draw.

[mcurrier]

Naa... Really not trying to sway anyone at all.

I just like pointing out to those that voted for Romney how stupid their choice was.

The non-democrat candidate has been chosen by liberals and the media several times over the past 20 years. You think McCain was the choice of most people? He was the easiest to beat by obama, the "old white guy", the "continuation of bush" as described iby the so-called unbiased media. Dems couldn't compete if they went up against who the people would really choose without being manipulated and conned.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

McCain didn't have a chance until that gal most of you don't like got on the ticket. I would have held my nose

on that one, too, until then.

Yes, even Romney being nominated, which I had better choices, tells me the GOP needs to be exploded and

a new party rise out of the ashes. So, strickj, maybe I'm dumb, but it is what it is, and until then we get this kind

of thing until then. I think things will change drastically pretty soon if Romney doesn't win. But it will just put

some things off.

[Oh Shoot]

McCain didn't have a chance until that gal most of you don't like got on the ticket.

You see Game Change? I quite enjoyed it.

- OS

[mikegideon]

You see Game Change? I quite enjoyed it.

- OS

He's blinded by the jiggly parts

[Oh Shoot]

He's blinded by the jiggly parts

I don't think Julianne Moore is actually quite as jiggly as the McCoy. She won an Emmy for what she had though.

- OS

[mikegideon]

Yep. Good movie.

[RobertNashville]

The non-democrat candidate has been chosen by liberals and the media several times over the past 20 years. You think McCain was the choice of most people? He was the easiest to beat by obama, the "old white guy", the "continuation of bush" as described iby the so-called unbiased media. Dems couldn't compete if they went up against who the people would really choose without being manipulated and conned.

Of course McCain wasn't the best candidate but it's not difficult to see how he managed to win the nomination.

Any time in any Republican primary race that you have a "moderate" candidate opposing two or more "conservative" candidates, the moderate is going to come out on top almost every time. I believe that's how McCain won the nomination helped a great deal by the manipulation of a few Republicans, Huckabee in particular who seemed to stay in the race for the soul purpose of diluting the conservative voters.

Frankly, I don't know that any Republican had a chance against Obama in 2008...given the "historic" chance to elect our first "black (never mind that he isn't truly black) President, the deck was stacked against whoever would have been running against him. Sara was the only bright spot in that race but between what the press did to her and how terribly and utterly stupid McCain's people were that were "handling" her; she didn't have a chance of making a real impact.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

You see Game Change? I quite enjoyed it.

- OS

No, I didn't, Mac, just a preview of it. I hope Ms. Moore did okay, because she didn't appear to me to be the type

of person to play her. Of course, this whole idea of creating a genre of movies like this makes me think of the revisionist

history types. The Brits sure didn't care for that blasphemy against Lady Thatcher, and several other modern day

political attempts by Hollywood. Who is that biotch playing Mrs. Reagan? Some more blasphemy with roots in Hanoi. I'm

sure it will be a box office smash, too.

At least the real Palin can take it and dish it back out. I hope Julianne Moore didn't trash her too bad.

Edited October 2, 2012 by 6.8 AR

[Oh Shoot]

No, I didn't, Mac, just a preview of it. I hope Ms. Moore did okay, because she didn't appear to me to be the type

of person to play her. Of course, this whole idea of creating a genre of movies like this makes me think of the revisionist

history types. The Brits sure didn't care for that blasphemy against Lady Thatcher, and several other modern day

political attempts by Hollywood. Who is that biotch playing Ms. Reagan? Some more blasphemy with roots in Hanoi. I'm

sure it will be a box office smash, too.

At least the real Palin can take it and dish it back out. I hope Julianne Moore didn't trash her too bad.

Hell, she looks just like Sarah in flick.

I thought it was probably relatively accurate about the whole saga. The degree to which she becomes basically unglued at one point is perhaps most controversial, though at least one former aide calls it pretty much dead on. One thing that was perhaps unrealistic was McCain's constant profanity in the flick as opposed to real life, he says he doesn't use "that much" profanity. Maybe.

Of course, Palin and McCain both said they didn't watch it. Right.

Bottom line is that it sure is entertaining for a political junkie, though. And nobody sued anybody either.

- OS

Edited October 1, 2012 by OhShoot

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I didn't say Julianne Moore wasn't good looking. I don't care about her for other reasons. If the movie represented

things accurately, that's about all anyone could ask for. She is a looker, no doubt, just couldn't see her in the role.

As for the former political aid, I guess it depends on which one out of his bunch was commenting. It seems there

were several in his camp who were hell-bent on sabotaging the campaign, to begin with, and are unfortunately

part of the Romney team. That sounds terrible to me, but it's somewhat part of the self destructive side of the GOP. There was one aide, Mark something, who did his best to unravel anything Palin did or tried to do, which was shown to be beneficial to the campaign, whether or not it would have put them over the top, and that's something we'll never know about, will we?

And that just makes me wonder how much Romney really wants to win this race, now that I know this. There are

definitely those in the Republican Party that are as or more traiterous to the American people and especially the

ones who voted for their candidates, than those blatant Democrats. The Progressives thrive in both parties. I

want them dead and gone in one of those parties. They can stay in the other one.

Any time no one get sued, it's a positive. I doubt Sarah watched it, but McCain's wife did.

Edited October 2, 2012 by 6.8 AR

[Guest ThePunisher]

Someone please try and convince me why I should vote for the commie this time over Romney. What are his accomplishments in that he should be given 4 more years to totally destroy the country.

Someone please convince me why Obama is the best thing for our country since sliced bread, and that I need to vote for him.

I still have not seen or been given a reason to vote for the commie from any of the democrats here.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I doubt that will happen.

[Guest CCI]

I still have not seen or been given a reason to vote for the commie from any of the democrats here.

Post#92, the u tube link.

[Guest ThePunisher]

Post#92, the u tube link.

Only anti-Romney clips put together by scared democrats. No reasons given why Obama's s#it doesn't stink, and that he will be economic savior of US. In 4 years there is no positive evidence he has a clue of how to create jobs. I'm really wanting a good reason to join the United Marxist Socialist Party of Amerkia, instead of being forced to pledge Aliegence to the commie party. At this time of my life addressing everyone as comrade just doesn't appeal to me. Being equal slaves of the commie party is not appealing either. I'm too damn old to bow down to some dictator.

Edited October 2, 2012 by ThePunisher

[rcrespo106]

I still have not seen or been given a reason to vote for the commie from any of the democrats here.

I don't think god himself could convince you to vote for Obama. Your opinion of Obama and the opinion of many others is swayed so far to one side that nothing could convince you. It does not really matter anyway, fact is there is now way in hell Obama would have a shot of winning the state of Tennessee, Why do you think they don't even bother to campaign here or run many ads. If anyone would even try and make a case as to why and vote for Obama by listing some of his accomplishments the vast majority of conservatives would not consider them to even be accomplishments.

But if you still want to see some of the things he has done take a look at the link below.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/09/01/a-long-list-of-president-obamas-accomplishments-with-citations/

[mcurrier]

Any time in any Republican primary race that you have a "moderate" candidate opposing two or more "conservative" candidates, the moderate is going to come out on top almost every time. I believe that's how McCain won the nomination helped a great deal by the manipulation of a few Republicans, Huckabee in particular who seemed to stay in the race for the soul purpose of diluting the conservative voters.

And a HUGE factor that you forgot to mention was Democrats/liberals crossing over during the primary polls to force the worst choice upon us. That is what has been the deciding factor of which candidate we get saddled with for several elections in the past 30 years. The Dems/libs play dirty. We need to have closed primaries to eliminate that manipulation.

[mcurrier]

I don't think god himself could convince you to vote for Obama. Your opinion of Obama and the opinion of many others is swayed so far to one side that nothing could convince you. It does not really matter anyway, fact is there is now way in hell Obama would have a shot of winning the state of Tennessee, Why do you think they don't even bother to campaign here or run many ads. If anyone would even try and make a case as to why and vote for Obama by listing some of his accomplishments the vast majority of conservatives would not consider them to even be accomplishments.

But if you still want to see some of the things he has done take a look at the link below.

http://www.addicting...with-citations/

Wow! I have to assume that you are just joking...otherwise I'd have to say - "Got Kool-Aid?" You do know that it's possible to o.d. on that stuff?!?!

[RobertNashville]

And a HUGE factor that you forgot to mention was Democrats/liberals crossing over during the primary polls to force the worst choice upon us. That is what has been the deciding factor of which candidate we get saddled with for several elections in the past 30 years. The Dems/libs play dirty. We need to have closed primaries to eliminate that manipulation.

Yeah...that's probably true although I don't know we have any way to prove it do we?

Whether we can or can't prove it that is one of the reasons why I think, at least in primary elections for Federal offices, the primary should be open only to that party...you shouldn't be able to switch back and forth just so you can screw up the party you are actually opposed to!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I don't think god himself could convince you to vote for Obama. Your opinion of Obama and the opinion of many others is swayed so far to one side that nothing could convince you. It does not really matter anyway, fact is there is now way in hell Obama would have a shot of winning the state of Tennessee, Why do you think they don't even bother to campaign here or run many ads. If anyone would even try and make a case as to why and vote for Obama by listing some of his accomplishments the vast majority of conservatives would not consider them to even be accomplishments.

But if you still want to see some of the things he has done take a look at the link below.

http://www.addicting...with-citations/

Do you consider anything in this link to be an accomplishment?

Let me ask it this way: Do you consider the "Affordable Care Act" to be an accomplishment? Do you consider

exposing your hand on a timetable to draw down troops from a war zone an accomplishment? Do you consider

a policy of withholding the exploration of oil on "federal" land and having an economic policy that raised the cost

of gas to the consumer by at least double an accomplishment? What about the use of Executive Orders to

circumvent Congress to push regulations that will cost the consumer more in electricity to heat and cool their

homes? Is that an accomplishment? What about the cost of federal regulations to businesses and individuals

as adding to the cost of running a business?

Is there no sanity? How much brain power does it take to realize that this man is single-handedly destroying this

country on top of what the previous congress forced on the taxpayer, some of which I added above which he is

the director of.

When you add that to his attitude of apology for our "past transgressions" against other countries, which I can't

find a reason for except his attitude of wanting us to adopt a European style of "democracy", I'm left with a very

bad taste in my mouth and cannot understand why anyone, other than a recipient of federal, read "taxpayer"

funds, would ever consider wanting this kind of person as a leader of a republic style of government.

If you believe that article is representative of "accomplishments", you must appreciate some form of marxism as

your savior. God doesn't need to get involved in this discussion.

Those so-called accomplishments is the the unraveling of our country. Look at any one of them in detail before

you accept any of them as a benefit to our country.