In light of my postings over the last year or so!

[Guest ArmyVeteran37214]

[sarcastic]

[/sarcastic]

Edited August 26, 2012 by ArmyVeteran37214

[mikegideon]

[Dolomite_supafly]

I figured I was going to open the thread and see an hour long compilation video. Not that we really want one.

Dolomite

Edited August 26, 2012 by Dolomite_supafly

[TripleDigitRide]

I enjoy your threads. I don't necessarily agree with everything you post, but I enjoy reading the reactions. Keep up the fight, my friend.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

As much as I hate seeing Rachel MadCow, just keep her to a minimum.

Now I know there has to be a human behind the videos. Keep it going.

[Guest ArmyVeteran37214]

As much as I hate seeing Rachel MadCow, just keep her to a minimum.

Now I know there has to be a human behind the videos. Keep it going.

The problem with trying to keep the MadCow videos to a minimum is that there really is very few tv news anchors/political pundits that cover what candidates like Ron Paul are doing. I simply want to post information/videos that I think is important to changing the how F'd up messed up are political system is. In order to fix the problems we need to get the real issues out there and discuss them. Things like which person is winning on American Idol or which sports team is better than the other only side track the general public from understanding what is happening behind the scenes in D.C. and in local politics. It's time to start waking up to the fact that if we don't change the course of this country now, it may not be the same for the next generation.

Edited August 26, 2012 by ArmyVeteran37214

[Sam1]

Ron Paul is a sham just like the rest of them, he is not doing anything, any differently than the other politicians except the fact that after he inserts his pork spending into the bills, he votes against them so he can tell everyone he is against all of that government waste. There's a reason his supporters are called Paulbots. Here are his recent earmark totals that he tells everyone he is against:

2011:$ 157 million - he was one of only 4 republicans that requested earmarks this year

2010:$ 17 million

2009:$ 80 million

2008:$ 27 million

This data is not hidden in the depths of the congressional library, so yes I would agree that people need to "wake up". And hopefully you don' think I get offended by your posts, the "buy silver from me now; world monetary systems have been on the brink of catastrophic collapse" are what get old. It's the same videos all the time except they say something new is happening and their "secret London source" is nothing more than a prediction based from historical charts.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

The problem with trying to keep the MadCow videos to a minimum is that there really is very few tv news anchors/political pundits that cover what candidates like Ron Paul are doing. I simply want to post information/videos that I think is important to changing the how F'd up messed up are political system is. In order to fix the problems we need to get the real issues out there and discuss them. Things like which person is winning on American Idol or which sports team is better than the other only side track the general public from understanding what is happening behind the scenes in D.C. and in local politics. It's time to start waking up to the fact that if we don't change the course of this country now, it may not be the same for the next generation.

And I don't disagree with that, at all, but you should notice by her timber and character she displays in her broadcasts that she appears to want Paul in the race as a spoiler to keep the "messiah" in office. That's the only reason I made my comment about her. I do wish the mainstream bunch of fools would report the news, but that never has been their intention, from it's inception.

Some of the videos you post on here are actually quite informing. That's why I'm not one of the detractors.

MadCow and the one who has problems with incontinence(Matthews) are where they belong, on MSNBC, and prove their worth every day by having such low ratings.

I wish the news wasn't that way, but they have always been about propaganda. That's how they were conceived. Some of the most informative reporting comes from some of the least expected places on the internet. That's why there are attempts being tried to stifle the medium. Net Neutrality keeps on coming back in different forms disguised in seemingly noble attempts to protect our children from bad places and to protect bandwidth and other things, but really to stifle information and regulate commerce, but some around here don't believe that.

I don't mind your videos.

Edited August 26, 2012 by 6.8 AR

[Guest ArmyVeteran37214]

Ron Paul is a sham just like the rest of them, he is not doing anything, any differently than the other politicians except the fact that after he inserts his pork spending into the bills, he votes against them so he can tell everyone he is against all of that government waste. There's a reason his supporters are called Paulbots. Here are his recent earmark totals that he tells everyone he is against:

2011:$ 157 million - he was one of only 4 republicans that requested earmarks this year

2010:$ 17 million

2009:$ 80 million

2008:$ 27 million

This data is not hidden in the depths of the congressional library, so yes I would agree that people need to "wake up". And hopefully you don' think I get offended by your posts, the "buy silver from me now; world monetary systems have been on the brink of catastrophic collapse" are what get old. It's the same videos all the time except they say something new is happening and their "secret London source" is nothing more than a prediction based from historical charts.

Your data requires links, to prove he is like all the other politicians in D.C. His job as a Representative is to make sure his constituents get there fair share of the services or say in the federal government on proposed legislation. I would hazard to guess that Ron Paul has said no to lobbyist money and to proposed legislation more times than any other congressman.

Edited August 26, 2012 by ArmyVeteran37214

[Guest ArmyVeteran37214]

Data goes back to 1992: http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/296/

http://www.ontheissues.org/tx/ron_paul.htm

[Sam1]

Data goes back to 1992: http://votesmart.org.../key-votes/296/

http://www.ontheissu...tx/ron_paul.htm

A list of his voting is completely irrelevant because he touts he has never "voted" for an earmark, but has submitted nearly half a billion dollars of them.

He doesn't want his drones to spend 5 minutes doing research to see how many hundreds of millions of dollars he has sent back to Texas with his left hand while yelling out to everyone to just keep looking at the bird in his right hand

All the data on everything is listed on dozens if not hundreds of congressional watch websites. The ONLY difference between him and the others is that he votes NO, after he submits the earmarks. I personally used to like the guy until reading a bit about him instead of just listening to him speak.