Jump to content

I'll support a ban on high capacity magazines


Guest model12

Recommended Posts

Guest model12
Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

Who are you to decide what anyone else needs, Troll?

Posted

You are 100% correct. However in that same law all things that people do not NEED that are even remotely dangerous should also be banned including sports cars, swimming pools, pool tables, celluar phones, TVs, ..... well actually everything except food, clothing, and shelter is not NEEDED by anyone and should be banned because no one needs such a thing.

Second, what assault rifles? Most civillians do not have a class 3 and even the ones who DO cannot get a modern assault rifle, only antiques. There are ZERO modern assault rifles in civiliian hands that you could ban ANY Mag for, because the guns do not exist.

Try again?

Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

I don't have any problem with a federal law that criminalizes the speech of uninformed morons. Bring on that ban.

  • Like 1
Guest FordRacing1
Posted

Why is this guy on a gunowners forum talking about banning something gun related........

Guest 6.8 AR
Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

Why do you need fingers? Oh! To type crap from your parent's basement. Get a life. You don't deserve breaks

you don't make for yourself, so don't demand them.

Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

We as a country would be better served by a ban on friggin' moronic dirty tree huggin' hippy scum.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break. Why in the h*ll does any civilian need a 20 or 30 round mag? Bring on the ban.

:poop: :poop: You'll probably vote for obummer too! :poop: :poop:

None of my rifles have assaulted anyone yet!

Guest bigbluedodge03
Posted (edited)

I don't have any problem with a federal ban on civilian ownership of "high capacity" magazines for assault rifles. Give me a break.

I must know, just what exactly would you should you be a victim to say a home invasion? Perhaps your wife, girlfriend, mother daughter whoever is brutally raped in the process. Please enlighten me. Also, define assault rifle.

Edited by bigbluedodge03
Posted

I must know, just what exactly would you should you be a victim to say a home invasion? Perhaps your wife, girlfriend, mother daughter whoever is brutally raped in the process. Please enlighten me. Also, define assault rifle.

I do believe they are taught that it is better to lay there and be raped rather than fight. I have even seen brochures condemning those who fight.

I guess he can call 911 and "entertain" the rapist while waiting for the cops to show.

As far as far as the definition. To him it is any black gun and they are all AK-47's or a Glock.

Dolomite

  • Admin Team
Posted

Just a quick note to anyone who thinks it's pretty funny to create additional accounts to come in and troll the forum and then watch the chaos ensue - when we ban you as a spammer/troll, it hits all of your aliases.

You'll lose your primary account as well.

Posted

Nothing EPIC about it. Some telling dumbass decided to incite the members of this board.

Yuup....seems like it worked too!

Now, can't we all just go back to beating up the OC/CC topic (and each other)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.