Are you happy with Obama as President?

[Guest ThePunisher]

Is life comfy for you after 4 years of Obama? Does he make you feel more secure? Do you like him and think he is personable and charming as President?

Do you think he has led our country in the right direction and will lead the country in the right direction if he is re-elected to 4 more years? With Obama as President, do you feel he will not impose more gun control restrictions, and will not try to assualt the 2nd Amendment if re-elected?

Do you believe your life will be better in 4 years if Obama gets re-elected? Do you believe America will be a better country as a result of Obama's leadership?

Do you believe your healthcare will be better as a result of Obamacare? Seniors, do you believe you will have good healthcare as you become elderly. Do you believe you will still be able to receive knee and hip replacements under Obamacare? Do you believe your healthcare will be cheaper under Obamacare?

Do you believe you will still be able to drive big cars and trucks if Obama stays in office? Do you still believe your heating and cooling bills will still be relative cheap with Obama as President? Do you believe that you will still be able to keep your small business operating if Obama is re-elected?

Do you believe race relations are better now than before Obama became President? Do you believe our Arab relations are better with Obama President.? Do you believe Obama has strained our relations with our best ally Israel in the Middle East? Do you believe Obama is cooking up something with Russia's Putin if he gets re-elected?

Do you believe under the leadership of Obama that the US is heading toward becoming reduced from being a superpower? Do you believe Obama has and is transforming America into a socialist/communist country? Do you believe Obama is anti-capitalism?

All you RP and GJ supporters; are you really happy with the direction of our country that Obama is taking it? Do you believe that America can withstand 4 more years of Obama as President? Would you be happy if America crumbles to its knees from 4 more years of Obama's Marxist policies?

If you really love America, would everyone consider uniting behind Romney to ensure that Obama does not get 4 more years of transforming America into Amerika?

[TrickyNicky]

I've considered it a great deal and will continue to do so probably right up until I pull my car into the parking lot at the poll.

It seems harder for me than it does for some I guess but I'm having a he'll of a time wrapping my mind around what the big difference between Obama and Rommney really are. Like I said in another thread ones a sh$& sandwich, the others a soggy sh$& sandwich with mustard. I dont know I think my problem boils down to wanting what's right for our country and I honestly believe both are damn bear as bad as each other.

Maybe I'll have mine with mustard, maybe I'll order the soup and see what they bring me, I just don't know.

[JohnC]

Obama sucks and I can not vote for that idiot.

Romney sucks, but I'm forced to vote for him because the stupid republican party keeps sticking these clowns up there instead of a true conservative or libertarian. He is the lesser of the evils.

It seems no matter who you vote for nowadays, you just keep getting more of the same - progressivism. It's just a matter of how fast and how much you get. The Reps just give it to us in smaller slower doses.

If we don't start putting real grassroots conservatives and libertarians in office instead of the party establishment elites, we're doomed to just keep heading for constitutional and financial failure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dolomite_supafly]

Although we like to think of Obama as the reason for all this crap we are in it isn't just him. We need to look at our representatives as well. Yes, Obama has figured out the executive order thing but the majority of the problems we have are caused by our representatives. We are lucky that they are split right now otherwise things would have been a lot worse regardless of which party held both the house and senate. Even if we get the president that this country needs without the house and senate to support him it means nothing. And likewise, if Obama wins another fours years we can take a lot of the wind out of his sails if we have true conservatives in the house and senate. The president can veto whatever he wants but it can still be passed with a 2/3 vote even if it is against his wishes.

Personally I would like to see another lame duck. At least more laws are not being rammed down our throats. Our representatives are not in Washington to repeal uneeded or unwanted laws, they are there making new ones. And any new law is a bad thing for us.

It is our represenatives that is the key to this country. At least more so than the president, whichever one that might be.

Dolomite

[frankmako]

time for change, one person at a time. vote them all out, start with new ones. can not get much worst than it is now. but it will get worst, time for all to get ready. the bigger problem is the dead beats that we made by giving them everything that they have. it will take years to cull out the dead beats.

[Guest ke0016]

I am better off, BUT it has nothing to do with who is in the White House!

I have taken a career path that allows me to make money on my merits and how hard I work. No president will change that.

I have also taken steps to ensure the safety of my family with regards to financial and physical. I place no merit in the president or the White House, just MY house.

Now with that said, the president can make things harder for me by ways I limiting our energy resources, gun laws, and fiscal policy. I do not believe that this president has acted responsibly throughout his term and I also do not believe that he believes in American freedom. I do believe that he is a true Communist by his words and he doesn't have our best interest in mind. I will not be voting for him as I didn't the last time around.

I do believe that Romney will run our county like a business and I think that he will do an OK job. I'm not thrilled by him but as a poster said above, "he's the lesser of two evils."

[Dennis1209]

Obama sucks and I can not vote for that idiot.

Romney sucks, but I'm forced to vote for him because the stupid republican party keeps sticking these clowns up there instead of a true conservative or libertarian. He is the lesser of the evils.

It seems no matter who you vote for nowadays, you just keep getting more of the same - progressivism. It's just a matter of how fast and how much you get. The Reps just give it to us in smaller slower doses.

If we don't start putting real grassroots conservatives and libertarians in office instead of the party establishment elites, we're doomed to just keep heading for constitutional and financial failure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well said and I totally agree.

Unless America holds its nose and votes for Romney we're getting another four more years. As I've always maintained, it's a wasted vote voting for any other party other than the Republicans or Democraps. That's the parties money, the liberal media, Hollywood and big business invests in

Though I fully understand the concept of not voting for "the lesser of two weevils", the fact remains your protest vote was wasted as far as election results.

My reasoning for voting for the "lesser" is sound logic. Theoretically, the lesser will take us on the progressive path from point A to point B at a slower rate. And hopefully in four more years the American people will be tired of choosing between a crap sandwich and a crap sandwich with condiments.

Either way, you're going to have bad breath and a choice between Scope or Listerine.

[mikegideon]

Folks seem to forget that if it wasn't for Republicans blocking every move Obama tried to make, we would be in MUCH deeper yogurt than we are now. The "party" didn't put anybody up. Romney was voted in by regular folks.

If you can't see the difference between Romney and Obama, I hope you can at least see the difference between Republicans and Democrats. The Repubs kept it from flying apart in Obama's FIRST term. Don't think for a moment that Romney won't be accountable to them.

[RobertNashville]

I agree that it isn't just one person but let's not forget that even if true Conservatives took working control of both the House and Senate, one man (Obama) can thwart almost anything a good Congress might try to accomplish AND he has the power of Executive Orders which has already used to circumvent the Constitution and existing laws. The President is only one man but it's one man with an incredible amount of power and Obama has shown no qualms about using it whether it's "Fast and Furious" or suing states like Arizona simply for trying to enforce laws that are a mirror image of Federal statutes or whether it's not pursuing Black Panthers who intimidate voters at the polls with violence.

Let us also not forget that the next president will likely appoint two or more Supreme Court Justices - I wonder if some who think we can live with another four years of Obama truly understand how devastating it will be to ALL our Constitutional rights if we get two or three or four new justices like Satomoyer or Kagan...how do you think the court would have ruled in the recent Second Amendment cases if more like those two were on court???

I believe Romney is a decent, moral, man with proven leadership qualities and good business sense who has accomplishments both inside and outside of politics. I certainly don't agree with some of the things he has done/stands on issues he has taken in the past but I've never met a candidate that I could say that about. Romney also wasn't my first choice for the nominee but I think at the end of the day, he'll at least try to do what is right for the country.

I believe at the end of the day, Obama will do what is best for him and that he could not care less about the United States...I believe he hates what this country is which is why his primary goal, as he stated, is to fundamentally transform America. Obama's mentor was a card carrying Communist and I believe Obama believes in the Marxist/Communist form or government.

Comparing the two viable choices this cycle, I won't have any trouble at all voting for Romney; and God help us and the United States should he lose and we have four more years of Obama.

[RobertNashville]

...I have taken a career path that allows me to make money on my merits and how hard I work. No president will change that....

I wouldn't bet on that.

Edited July 28, 2012 by RobertNashville

[mikegideon]

I wouldn't bet on that.

I think you just won the thread.

[Bigiron]

Our economy is in shambles. I truly believe Romney can improve our situation. I also truly believe a second term for Zero would destroy what is left of our country.

[mikegideon]

Our economy is in shambles. I truly believe Romney can improve our situation. I also truly believe a second term for Zero would destroy what is left of our country.

What he said.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Yep!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Folks seem to forget that if it wasn't for Republicans blocking every move Obama tried to make, we would be in MUCH deeper yogurt than we are now. The "party" didn't put anybody up. Romney was voted in by regular folks.

If you can't see the difference between Romney and Obama, I hope you can at least see the difference between Republicans and Democrats. The Repubs kept it from flying apart in Obama's FIRST term. Don't think for a moment that Romney won't be accountable to them.

People do tend to forget about, Mike. There's a lot to be said for a loyal opposition.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Our economy is in shambles. I truly believe Romney can improve our situation. I also truly believe a second term for Zero would destroy what is left of our country.

I don't know if he can, but I know the other one wants to do the opposite.

[Guest mcgyver210]

The Simplest answer I know is

NO!!!!!

Obama doesn't believe in what this Country was founded on, I really believe his ultimate goal is to be a Dictator, Ruler etc. If he stays in office he will move towards this direction rapidly & most likely will create a way for him to stay in power longer than two terms.

He doesn't believe in small business making it either. As a small business it has been harder to make it under his administration but I can say me & my family built our businesses over our 20 yrs not Obama or the Government. In reality I have paid more taxes during his term than any other past administration.

Now do I think we will be stuck with him again? Unfortunately "YES" which means America will never be the same. Americans seem to have short memories so when at the polls if Panthers aren't intimidating many will still forget the harm this Idiot has done to our Country.

[Guest ThePunisher]

NO!!!!!

Now do I think we will be stuck with him again? Unfortunately "YES" which means America will never be the same. Americans seem to have short memories so when at the polls if Panthers aren't intimidating many will still forget the harm this Idiot has done to our Country.

These short memories are the result of being brainwashed by the liberal and union controlled public eduction system that tells the fools that the guvmitt will give them everything they will need free. They're not capable of thinking independently for themselves. As long as Obama promises them everything free, and until the country collapses economically, then they will always have short memories.

What I can't really understand is why those that have to work hard for a living everyday, and pay the taxes, vote for Obama to keep these freeloaders going everyday?

[strickj]

I'll either vote for the guy that didn't sign an AWB into law or simply leave the POTUS blank.

With the exception of a couple of social issues, there is no difference between Romney and Obama.

[RobertNashville]

I'll either vote for the guy that didn't sign an AWB into law or simply leave the POTUS blank.

With the exception of a couple of social issues, there is no difference between Romney and Obama.

I understand that there are never any guarantees but do you truly think, deep down, that the people Obama appoints to the Supreme Court won't think just like he does and won't erase and destroy everything gained in the last 20 years or so?

Do you really think that two or three or four more like the two gun-hating, ultra liberal socialists he's already appointed would have voted favorably in the DC or the Chicago decision?

Where would we be right now if the Supreme Court had decided that the Second Amendment wasn't an individual right? Do you think maybe, just maybe the ability to carry in ANY state might be in jeopardy?

And that's just the "gun" issue...there are others equally as if not more important to be concerned about.

I mean no disrespect but while Romney is far from perfect I have a difficult time believing that people can't see a difference between him and the Marxist in the office now..

Edited July 28, 2012 by RobertNashville

[Guest CCI]

I'll either vote for the guy that didn't sign an AWB into law or simply leave the POTUS blank.

With the exception of a couple of social issues, there is no difference between Romney and Obama.

2010: The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gives Obama a grade of "F'' for failing to push even the gun restrictions he supported while campaigning.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/07/21/obama-romney-views-have-evolved-toward-gun-rights/#ixzz21x7stFYZ

Obama talks and supports gun laws! And thats all he does!

Romney in 2004 signed into law, banning assault weapons in Massachusetts!

I was going to vote for Romney! But I will not vote, for any one signing into law anti-gun laws!

[strickj]

I understand that there are never any guarantees but do you truly think, deep down, that the people Obama appoints to the Supreme Court won't think just like he does and won't erase and destroy everything gained in the last 20 years or so?

Do you really think that two or three or four more like the two gun-hating, ultra liberal socialists he's already appointed would have voted favorably in the DC or the Chicago decision?

Where would we be right now if the Supreme Court had decided that the Second Amendment wasn't an individual right? Do you think maybe, just maybe the ability to carry in ANY state might be in jeopardy?

And that's just the "gun" issue...there are others equally as if not more important to be concerned about.

I mean no disrespect but while Romney is far from perfect I have a difficult time believing that people can't see a difference between him and the Marxist in the office now..

Honestly, Robert, I could care less about the "what ifs" concerning possible supreme court appointees.

Just judging the two on gun history, Romney has more anti-gun stuffs on his record then O does. So what makes you think that Romney would appoint a pro-gun judge(s)?

O is a socialist? Jay Leno said it best: "You remember Romney? He invented Obama Care before he was against it".

Romney Care = Obama Care. Key author is the same guy, even.

Social issues: It should be no secret here that I'm to the left on social issues. And Romney has more policies that I can agree with then disagree with. That alone should tell you just how "conservative" he is. Course, he also has a couple or so religious inspired policies... I suppose is why he's able to call himself an R.

Problem is, he has flip flopped on these issues so who knows what he will actually do when the time comes?

When it comes down to it, O and Romney are both Cali Libs, with the exception of a few social issues.

So, explain to me again why I should vote for the guy that has signed an AWB?

[strickj]

2010: The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gives Obama a grade of "F'' for failing to push even the gun restrictions he supported while campaigning.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.c.../#ixzz21x7stFYZ

Obama talks and supports gun laws! And thats all he does!

Romney in 2004 signed into law, banning assault weapons in Massachusetts!

I was going to vote for Romney! But I will not vote, for any one signing into law anti-gun laws!

Someone posted in another thread two or three anti-gun things that has occurred under O.

But we seem to forget that two or three pro-gun things have also happened under his reign, too.

Like you, I refuse to vote for a man that has signed an AWB into law. O and the liberals know better then to touch on gun issues. They will loose all hope of control for a long damn time if they do.

the question is, does this republican know better?

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I'll either vote for the guy that didn't sign an AWB into law or simply leave the POTUS blank.

With the exception of a couple of social issues, there is no difference between Romney and Obama.

Are you saying you would possibly vote for Obama? I guarantee if he had a bill like that to sign he wouldn't

hesitate. But they're just alike...I keep forgetting.

[mikegideon]

2010: The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gives Obama a grade of "F'' for failing to push even the gun restrictions he supported while campaigning.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.c.../#ixzz21x7stFYZ

Obama talks and supports gun laws! And thats all he does!

Romney in 2004 signed into law, banning assault weapons in Massachusetts!

I was going to vote for Romney! But I will not vote, for any one signing into law anti-gun laws!

He's trying to improve his grades with the Brady Bunch as we speak. Stupid move on his part too. I kinda like it