Zimmerman Trial Updates - Ongoing

[mikegideon]

That makes sense. If he gets reelected, they'll hang the guy. If he doesn't they let him go, start a bunch of riots and blame the new president. Got it!

I'm talking about the rotund prosecutor.

[Caster]

I'm talking about the rotund prosecutor.

Okay, I didn't get it.

I'm too simple minded for court proceedings and politics.

[RobertNashville]

Just so I understand, its okay to rush to judgement that Martin was a punk kid that had it coming but it's not okay to rush to judgement that Zimmerman was an overzealous wanna-be?

Actually; that's about the exact opposite of the thought I as trying to convey.

Edited May 22, 2012 by RobertNashville

[mikegideon]

Martin was a punk. I didn't arrive at it in a rush. It took awhile for THAT to sneak past the filters too.

[QuietDan]

I ain't been following this, but I am curious: How long till we get a verdict? Days? Weeks?

Who's taking bets on riots if he's acquitted?

I'd rather there not be a trial 'till after the election. We don't need any excuses for pre-election riots, even though we might all be forced into it anyways.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I'm not worried about riots. If they start something, maybe a bunch of thugs will get killed. If they don't respect

justice, they should get some. Maybe the old fashioned way. The idiot thugs will be rioting for nothing legitimate

and, if Obama plays his cards like he's been doing, he will lose this one in the public eye, too.

If there was a genuine reason for riots, it would be for government tyranny, not some dumb court case like

this. Tyranny keeps on winning because it is incremental and sheep tend to lay around and not notice. This

race crap was ginned up and if it becomes volatile, it could hurt a lot of people. It would be a big black eye

for Obama, politically. More democrats would leave their party, also. There are plenty of very fine black

people who don't want any part of this. There will be no justification for any rioting, anywhere, and it is a pity

if those dumb thugs are allowed to get away with this.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I'd rather there not be a trial 'till after the election. We don't need any excuses for pre-election riots, even though we might all be forced into it anyways.

I still don't think there will be a trial. If there is, it will be a farce.

[laktrash]

http://news.yahoo.co...-133743219.html

Four witnesses change stories . Here we go. Fair trial ???

Edited May 23, 2012 by laktrash

[mikegideon]

"Zimmerman was on top"??? The defense will rip that one apart.

[gjohnsoniv]

http://news.yahoo.co...-133743219.html

Four witnesses change stories . Her we go. Fair trial ???

They obviously would rather not have any repercussions then they would have justice and a fair trial. Edited May 23, 2012 by gjohnsoniv

[mcurrier]

http://news.yahoo.co...-133743219.html

Four witnesses change stories . Her we go. Fair trial ???

I smell payoffs and/or death threats.

[gjohnsoniv]

I smell payoffs and/or death threats.

Black Panthers?

[mikegideon]

They can't erase their original testimony. Make up whatever you want at this point.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

"Zimmerman was on top"??? The defense will rip that one apart.

There still is that one guy who said Martin was beating the Hell, MMA style, out of Zimmerman.

Intimidation is going on somewhere.

This story is about as absurd as the one about gay marriage, reported by Ann Compton on ABC

News Radio this morning. She reported a poll(forgot which) saying that the American Public has

changed to be in support of it. The Dems are still trying to make something out of nothing every

time they turn around. All this stuff is essentially hurting their saviour.

They will keep on messing with this case until they stir up those riots people fear. It's only good

news to them. And it reminds them of the Chicago riots and Kent State.

[gjohnsoniv]

The Democrats new slogan should be "taste the rainbow."

[Guest 6.8 AR]

That's a little over the top, but probably accurate.

[gjohnsoniv]

That's a little over the top, but probably accurate.

I realized I went a little over the top there, and I mean it in a joking manner, not an offensive one.

[RobertNashville]

They can't erase their original testimony. Make up whatever you want at this point.

So; these folks were either lying then or are lying now, correct? Either way, they seem to be, shall I ay, unfamiliar with the truth and can't be trusted.

[mikegideon]

So; these folks were either lying then or are lying now, correct? Either way, they seem to be, shall I ay, unfamiliar with the truth and can't be trusted.

I'm sure those tactics work against a crappy trial lawyer. Zimmerman's guy is anything but crappy. I expect him to eat their lunch with junk like this.

[mcurrier]

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN’S CASE WEAKENS EVEN AS PUBLIC OPINION TURNS IN HIS FAVOR

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/george-zimmermans-case-weakens-as-public-opinion-turns-in-his-favor/

[mikegideon]

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN’S CASE WEAKENS EVEN AS PUBLIC OPINION TURNS IN HIS FAVOR

http://www.theblaze....s-in-his-favor/

The guy that wrote this article has never been thru a trial. Polls mean nothing. None of the poll participants have heard testimony, rebuttals, guidance from a judge, etc. Saying that a poll can determine the outcome of a case is downright stoopid.

[QuietDan]

The guy that wrote this article has never been thru a trial. . . .

Worse. The guy who wrote this piece is a leftist operative. I don't believe a word of it.

[gjohnsoniv]

Trying to instill doubt is what he's doing.

[R_Bert]

GEORGE ZIMMERMAN’S CASE WEAKENS EVEN AS PUBLIC OPINION TURNS IN HIS FAVOR

http://www.theblaze....s-in-his-favor/

Right. Public opinion sure convicted Casey Anthony.....

[mikegideon]

Trying to instill doubt is what he's doing.

He's dancing for the wrong crowd.