posting legality question

[Mdunntn]

There is a local restaurant that has absolutely no posting visable from the entrance, however once you walk in they site the tca code on the wall. Is this a legal posting or entrapment?

[Fallguy]

Is it a 39-17-1359 sign or is it the one that say "Carry where alcoholic beverages are served/sold is a misedemeanor...."?

If it is the later, may places still have those even though the law doesn't require it anymore and doesn't apply to HCP holders. It has been reported that some ABC agents have told owners they are still supposed to have them, but that was right after the law change.

If it is a 39-17-1359 sign, the fact it isn't posted at the entrance means it is not posted correctly per the law.

[glowdotGlock]

When i first got my hcp about 5 years ago the instructor said there had to be a sign with a gun and the slash through it and that just simply posting "no guns allowed" wouldn't cut it. I should know this but what is the rule to this?

Sent from my Droid RAZR Maxx

[bubbiesdad]

When i first got my hcp about 5 years ago the instructor said there had to be a sign with a gun and the slash through it and that just simply posting "no guns allowed" wouldn't cut it. I should know this but what is the rule to this?

Sent from my Droid RAZR Maxx

The gun-buster wasn't valid five years ago. The sign had to be precisely worded.

[glowdotGlock]

The local movie theater has a list of things that aren't allowed and one list is firearms. It's not really "clearly" posted.

Sent from my Droid RAZR Maxx

Edited April 8, 2012 by glowdotGlock

[Mdunntn]

Tca 39-17-1359 owner operator banned weapons in building and property in short. Posted inside restaurant. So not a legal posting?

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

Edited April 8, 2012 by Mdunntn

[Mdunntn]

Scratch that there is a translucent gun buster on the door. It has no color to it and is completely clear. Only reason I even noticed it was because of the circle shape on the door.. it is not clear whatsoever

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

[Oh Shoot]

The gun-buster wasn't valid five years ago. The sign had to be precisely worded.

No, wording was left even more vague back then, there was only the "substantially similar" admonition, with that phrase left undefined.

And presently, though the "substantially similar" verbiage has been clarified, only the park statute has exact wording specified (and minimum size).

- OS

[Oh Shoot]

When i first got my hcp about 5 years ago the instructor said there had to be a sign with a gun and the slash through it and that just simply posting "no guns allowed" wouldn't cut it. I should know this but what is the rule to this?

To be clear for you, gunbuster sign of any size is now a valid posting.

- OS

[Mdunntn]

I'm think I'm going to try to contact the restaurant and tell them they need a much more visible sign. You literally have to be right next to it to tell what's on the sticker.

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

[Makiaveli]

I'm think I'm going to try to contact the restaurant and tell them they need a much more visible sign. You literally have to be right next to it to tell what's on the sticker.

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

Don't forget to let them know you won't be back until they remove the sign

[Mdunntn]

Its the little Tokyo off of Chapman highway in Knoxville, in case anybody is wondering

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk

[Guest Lowbuster]

Don't forget to tell them that none of us thousands of people will be eating there. And also it will be shared with us that when their sign comes down, we will feel safe eating there again