Cain ad video of shotgunner blasting "bunnies" causes libs to flip out

[Guest profgunner]

Check out the new Herman Cain ad ( http://bcove.me/zi2a3wwp ) whichs libs describe as "graphically violent". LMAO!!! Looks like the shooter has pretty good form, and is setting a good example by wearing safety glasses. Is that an old Ithaca model 37 he's using to pop that bunny????

[TMF]

I thought this was a joke the first time I saw it.

[MattCary]

Same question:

"You going to eat that bunny?"

[Guest 6.8 AR]

That's a great play on the liberal crap a few years back. Use their own methods. That's good.

[mikegideon]

I like Herman. I don't think he should be the Prez, but I like him.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I like him,too. I would have been happy with him Prez. May not have been that great, but considering

the last bunch or three, he would have been okay.

[mikegideon]

I don't think he could have stood up to the nasty games. I think he was lucky to get some of it early on.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

He was really ambushed. I think they were scared of him like they were/are of Sarah Palin.

[mikegideon]

Sarah's a good girl, but she's an idiot. Let me qualify that. Her heart is probably in the right place, but she doesn't know enough to do the job. She was a handful for the McCain campaign, just because of her lack of knowledge.

They will ambush anybody. I don't think it was especially a fear of Herman.

[daddyo]

How ironic that the charge of "graphic violence" comes from one of the most violent groups in the country - liberals.

[daddyo]

Sarah's a good girl, but she's an idiot. Let me qualify that. Her heart is probably in the right place, but she doesn't know enough to do the job. She was a handful for the McCain campaign, just because of her lack of knowledge.

They will ambush anybody. I don't think it was especially a fear of Herman.

It it's truly a lack of knowledge, then she would qualify as being ignorant - not the same thing as being an idiot, which I don't think she is.

[mikegideon]

It it's truly a lack of knowledge, then she would qualify as being ignorant - not the same thing as being an idiot, which I don't think she is.

I'll give you that. She had moments of idiocy during the campaign.

[Guest Lester Weevils]

There's got to be someone better out there somewhere and Cain ain't perfect, but would expect a Pres Cain to work out better than Pres Obama, Pres Bush, or Pres Carter. I didn't care for Reagan or Clinton, but they were either smart or incredibly lucky. Wouldn't automatically expect Cain to be as "lucky" as Reagan or Clinton.

Of the ones still in the running, wouldn't know what to expect of actual results from Pres Ron Paul, not that it will ever happen. Though I like Paul best. Guessing at the results of a Paul presidency would be as difficult as guessing at the results of a Perot presidency.

Am having trouble visualizing the remaining three doing a substantially better job than Bush, which was a pretty sucky job. But MAYBE they can pull it off better than Obama or Carter. Maybe. I don't think Santorum would do any better than Bush and quite possibly worse. Gingrich is so opinionated and has his own set of "quirky" ideas, it would be a crap shoot. Romney might be a little better than Bush. Or not. As much as I dislike Romney, he doesn't have as much "flake factor" as Santorum or Gingrich.

If we could find a slick smart poll-driven praise-coveting sociopath like Clinton, except not anti-gun and a little more fiscally conservative-- There were lots of things wrong with Clinton but he did pretty good on a lot of stuff. A poll-driven presidency ain't all bad. It allows for policy reversals when it becomes obvious that the american people don't like the direction. With most of these jokers lately, it is like electing a dictator for a four year term. They do whatever crazy stuff that comes in their heads regardless what citizens think about it. We don't elect four-year dictators, we elect presidents dammit!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Yeh, Lester, I agree about Clinton for one reason only. He saw that his pushing to the left would kill his

chances of re-election. Otherwise, he was a traitor to the American people, like Obama. It will probably

never get out about his dealings with all the Arab states. He also had chances to get Bin Laden and didn't

take them. I won't go into the sex scandal that almost got him impeached, rather almost removed from

office. I won't let revisionist history allow him to become a saint. Don't forget the Assault Weapon Ban.

But your observation about his astuteness with the political angles did somewhat succeed.