TSA to expand VIPER - additional funding approved

[mcurrier]

Here is more of what 'TSA' is up to -

We've already known about all of it for months, but now they are setting aside funding to expand VIPER. This is not good. Soon they will require ID to travel from state to state.

Read this ENTIRE article! (not very long)

» Congress To Fund Massive Expansion Of TSA Checkpoints Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

This article covers VIPER (already going on in TN), the so-called NAD Act passed last week (which gives US military power to now detain any US citizen indefinitely without warrant or charge), the building of FEMA detention camps, and the recent hiring of "contractors" by the govt. to run those camps.

Plus, several stories have come out this week about what theater TSA is putting on at airports, because their motions on the tretense of "protecting" us aren't actually doing anything. Two reporters made fake boarding passes last week and were able to walk past TSA security on multipe tries at several different airports. TSA is just trying to condition people to be obedient cattle.

This is un-American. Think what you want, but ask yourself why are they doing this?

[Guest bkelm18]

America's Gestapo. Just wait. It'll happen.

[Guest Lester Weevils]

This older Reason mag article discusses the odds of harm from terrorism--

Don't Be Terrorized - Reason Magazine

From the article--

To try to calculate those odds realistically, Michael Rothschild, a former business professor at the University of Wisconsin, worked out a couple of plausible scenarios. For example, he figured that if terrorists were to destroy entirely one of America's 40,000 shopping malls per week, your chances of being there at the wrong time would be about one in one million or more. Rothschild also estimated that if terrorists hijacked and crashed one of America's 18,000 commercial flights per week that your chance of being on the crashed plane would be one in 135,000.

Even if terrorists were able to pull off one attack per year on the scale of the 9/11 atrocity, that would mean your one-year risk would be one in 100,000 and your lifetime risk would be about one in 1300. (300,000,000 ÷ 3,000 = 100,000 ÷ 78 years = 1282) In other words, your risk of dying in a plausible terrorist attack is much lower than your risk of dying in a car accident, by walking across the street, by drowning, in a fire, by falling, or by being murdered.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

It's got nothing to do with terrorism. and it will

happen. The constant drip, drip, drip, of the

excess stomach acid known as tyranny.

A little more each time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Guest mcgyver210]

This is just HISTORY repeating itself, We are headed for a Civil War because once again Government is Out Of Control.

Nazi Germany is a reality, Not Papers Please it is Papers NOW or Ill Kill You with Extreme Prejudice.

They want registration on all our weapons so it is easier to take them when they decide the US Constitution is Outdated & Obsolete under their New Regime.

[JayC]

Time to call your local legislator and request that TN pass a law prohibiting local police departments and the state police from working with the TSA unless there is a known threat of terrorism in TN.

[mcurrier]

Now DHS is going to start (like they haven't already) monitoring social media activity, "forums, blogs, public websites and message boards."

They say, "The idea is to gather and analyze publicly available information, and then use that information to help officials respond to disasters and other situations."

Would those be those pesky 'man caused disasters' that we keep hearing about? And 'other situations'. Very interesting!

DHS is stonewalling on producing documents requested in FOIA requests. No different than DOJ not providing FOIA requests or even Congressionally subpoenaed documents.

The shredders must be going 24/7 in the Obama Regime. Silly me, I should have invested in stock of shredder manufacturers.

Privacy Group Sues DHS Over Social Media Monitoring Program | Fox News

MOST TRANSPARENT REGIME EVER!

Edited December 25, 2011 by mcurrier
spelling

[Guest HvyMtl]

And yet, a lot here keep voting FOR those who keep expanding this... Let us NOT vote for those who want to take our freedom.