Jump to content

Looking at either a FNX-45 or a S&W M&P 45 opinions on either


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure what the difference is between a FNP-45, which i have and the PNX-45, but I love my FNP-45. A really good shooter and eats any kind of ammo. Never had an issue with it at all.

Posted

Both are great guns and were proven in the military test. The only real difference is that the FNP-45 is a HUGE gun. The M&P45 is realatively small feeling for a full size gun. It has a very similar feel to the M&P9/40, which was surprising.

Posted

There is no such thing as an fnx45. Brief history lesson - FN developed the fn line of pistols (fnp9/357/40). They then developed the FNP-45 which although still labeled FNP, was pretty much a completely different gun. The new FNX line is based off the changed they made from the fnp9/357/40s to the fnp 45. In a nutshell, the FNX line is an fnp45 but for 9mm and 40s&w.

hammer fired vs striker fired

14+1 rounds w/ optional extended baseplates vs 10+1 rounds

3 mags included vs 2 mags included? (tbh I am not 100% certain how many mags come with the s&w)

If you are just comparing basic models, I would probably go with the m&p, but I do have a fancy for the fnp45 tactical. The tactical comes with extended mags, a pretty cool canvas pistol case/range bag that is modular so you can customize it, threaded barrel, and raised nights sights (so that they see over the supressor you mount). It also comes with a pre-tapped slide for mounting a red dot.

Figure out your intended use and that will help you pick out which gun to get. Both are good shooters, but the FNP45 is a BIG gun.

Guest bkelm18
Posted

I've never shot or handled the FN, but the M&P45 is an excellent weapon. Drop in some Apex Tactical internals and it turns it into a dream, as with any M&P.

Posted
Figure out your intended use and that will help you pick out which gun to get. Both are good shooters, but the FNP45 is a BIG gun.

Intended use for either is home defense so size in the case of the FN is not a problem.....

Posted

My FNP 45 spits out anything that I feed it. I am not a BIG man and do not have BIG hands but I shoot it very well and it is comfortable to me. It is slightly larger than a full sized Glock of the same caliber in my opinion. I have no experience with the M&P, but I am sure it is a fine weapon. If it is for home defense and size is not an issue, they are both reliable weapons, go out and handle both of them before you decide.

Posted
My FNP 45 spits out anything that I feed it. I am not a BIG man and do not have BIG hands but I shoot it very well and it is comfortable to me. It is slightly larger than a full sized Glock of the same caliber in my opinion. I have no experience with the M&P, but I am sure it is a fine weapon. If it is for home defense and size is not an issue, they are both reliable weapons, go out and handle both of them before you decide.

I don't mean desert eagle big, my purpose of BIG is that your average person probably doesn't want to or couldn't conceal carry it.

To the OP - if for home defense, either would be a fine choice. You will get larger magazine capacity with the FN, and if you go with the tactical version you have the threaded barrel ready for a suppresor, and night sights standard - assuming those are things you would like. The m&p will probably have a little less felt recoil due to the lower bore axis, but the fnp45 is an easy shooter as well. I suggest trying to hold one of each just to see which feels better in hand. The m&p should be easy to find in local shops, the fnp45 not so much. I know bill's outpost in Farragut had a trade in for a FDE framed fnp45 in their case, at least when I was there on Saturday. I believe bass pro shop generally stocks FN pistols as well, so they probably have an fnp45. It would at least be worth giving them a call before driving over.

Posted

You might like the M&P better. Hands down the FNP will out shoot it and is a tack driver. Amazing gun and the magazine capacity is awesome.

Guest bulluck533
Posted

I would go with the FN. The FN's trigger is superior and it can hold 15 rounds of 45.

Posted
You might like the M&P better. Hands down the FNP will out shoot it and is a tack driver. Amazing gun and the magazine capacity is awesome.

Just did a search on Gun Genie.....no M&P's in my area but plenty of FN's, but the S&W is over $100 cheaper than the FN (MSRP wise).......

Posted
Just did a search on Gun Genie.....no M&P's in my area but plenty of FN's, but the S&W is over $100 cheaper than the FN (MSRP wise).......

The extra $100 is for the advantage of higher capacity magazines..:biglol:

Posted

I don't think it is just the extra capacity mags. You also get one more mag, as well as a longer barrel. Ultimately it is your choice, but I think the price is comparable based on the differences between what you get.

I have had two FNP-45s. The first had no issues, but I traded it away. The second had a return to battery issue, which FN gave me a new pistol in return. I wound up selling that one recently. For some reason I still have a hankering to get another.

As for size, the FN is a big gun but not unwieldy. It shoots well, is very accurate, but is not for concealment. I have no experience with the M&P, but have held one. The FN felt better in my hand.

Guest snatch38388
Posted

Shot both the fnp by far the recoil on the s&w irritates my trigger finger the glock design is not as good as the glock original the fnp is a sweet shooting gun. Check your mags though some round nose will get stuck about 4 rounds down the mag Winn white box and Tula on mine. I just traded mine but it will soon be replaced with the tactical

Model.

Posted

S@W is extremely resistant to corrosion. The slide and barrel are stainless. There are not much openings in a gun to let corrosive substance in. If you are in performance sports, be aware that human sweat can ruin a gun almost like salt spray. S&W is one of a few weapons that survive contact with the sweat.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you have never shot a FNP-45 and would like to shoot one, let me know. I still have mine that I was planning on selling.

Guest bkelm18
Posted
Shot both the fnp by far the recoil on the s&w irritates my trigger finger the glock design is not as good as the glock original the fnp is a sweet shooting gun.

To each their own. I own and carry both a Glock and an M&P, and IMO the M&P is the better gun. Better ergos and a trigger that is lightyears better than the Glock's.

Posted
Im looking at replacing my Sig P220

Why's that?? I already know I want a P220, but just curious as to why you would like to replace it..poor Sig.

Posted
Why's that?? I already know I want a P220, but just curious as to why you would like to replace it..poor Sig.

The Sig is my nightstand piece and it does not have the ability to mount a flashlight hence my reason for a replacement.

Posted

I would go with the FN. I bought one when they first came out a few years ago and I love it. I have shot every kind of ammo I can find through it and it has fed everything. I haven't cleaned it in over 850 rounds. I'm not going to clean it until it starts messing up. I just got in some night sights for it and I'm going to stick those on tomorrow. Other than that it is a factory stock gun.

The FN is a big gun no doubt. But the grip isnt as big as the Glock 20/21. I have little girl hands and the Glock is too big for my hands, but the FN fits fine. I am looking to buy another one in the not so distant future.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.