Jump to content

Keltec PLR16 Style Pistols vs traditional


Recommended Posts

Posted

Can anyone educate me on the functional difference between the Keltec PLR16 style of 5.56 pistol vs the tradiotional style? What I'm looking for is info about how they work. Keltec, and a few others make theirs without a buffer assembly group, makin g for a shorter overall length, while most others do have that part, making for a much longer overall length. How do these differences affect operation and performnance. Although my experience has alwaqys been with the traditional style, WITRH the buffer assembly, apparently the Keltec style works well also. Anyone?

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

That "tube" above the barrel has the spring in it, the web site says it's gas operated, I have had mine apart and if you release the tube that holds the spring it makes the chamber "free floating"

Posted

Not sure what you are asking.

I have owned several AR-15's, own a PLR-16 now, have never owned a AR-15 pistol.

I've never had a malfunction with my PLR-16. So performance is there. To me, it's a belly gun or CQB on steroids. I've shot it offhand at pistol range distances with good results; I've never shot for group size (I don't consider it a target or hunting weapon)

I bought mine so I could throw it in the trunk (loaded) in case I was ever in a situation where I needed that kind of firepower. Once the law passed that allowed HCP holders to carry rifles that wasn't an issue anymore.

The cons? As you point out it is not "traditional"; it is not an AR-15. You don't have the accessory options you have with an AR.

Posted

The only thing about the PLR is that its velocity (due to short barrel) means you may not get your frag/tumble effects if used as a defensive weapon with some ammo types and medium-longer ranges. It works well, the only malfunctions I have had are on handloads that I messed up. I do not know about the part that it does not have but it performs well, it reliable and pretty accurate up to 100 yards. I havent tried to go farther than that with it yet. A lot of gun for the money and in a small package, its a great piece of hardware.

You can get the manual online to see the expanded view of how it is made.

Guest Lester Weevils
Posted

I'm dumb on gun innards and it has been a few months since I had mine apart. Hopefully it isn't wrong info to say that the PLR-16 borrows from the AK style action a little bit with the top gas tube. Also, unless I'm remembering wrong, it uses a piston in the spring tube.

The bolt is a rotating bolt with locking lugs that look somewhat like an AR.

Wikipedia says it like this-- The PLR-16 combines the multi-lug rotating bolt design and breech-locking system of the AR-15 with a gas piston system similar to that of the M-1 Garand, M-14, and AK-47. This system requires less maintenance than the direct gas impingement system of the AR-15 platform.

Posted

I appreciate the answers, and it is probably my poorly phrased question that is causing me to not get the answer I seek. In an AR, the buffer assembly group is the tube in the buttstock that contains the spring and the buffer, a longish metal tubular closed ends piece that slides back and forth in the buffer tube. Thesre is a reason for this contraption, it's not for looks, lol. But the PLR 16 does not have this. Some ar style pistols have this buffer tube assembly like on the AR15s, and some do not. My questions is why? There must be some pros and conms to each idea, as both obviously sell.

Posted
I appreciate the answers, and it is probably my poorly phrased question that is causing me to not get the answer I seek. In an AR, the buffer assembly group is the tube in the buttstock that contains the spring and the buffer, a longish metal tubular closed ends piece that slides back and forth in the buffer tube. Thesre is a reason for this contraption, it's not for looks, lol. But the PLR 16 does not have this. Some ar style pistols have this buffer tube assembly like on the AR15s, and some do not. My questions is why? There must be some pros and conms to each idea, as both obviously sell.

Look at the gun, the tube on top of the barrel is the "buffer" tube, same part, just redesigned and relocated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.