Jump to content

Judge Revives Tennessee Gun Rights' Lawsuit

MikePapa1

By MikePapa1
in 2A Legislation and Politics

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Guest 6.8 AR

Guest 6.8 AR

Posted
Posted

Now that's interesting.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guest ArmyVeteran37214

Guest ArmyVeteran37214

Posted
Posted
Kwik is the herpes of the gun world: he just won't go away.

IAgree.gif

DRM Established Contributor

DRM

Posted
Posted
I do think this lawsuit makes some very good points.....

As do I - and I am very glad to see it move forward.

Plus, I'll be giggling and peeing my pants if Kwik is the spark that burns down some of this state's crappy laws, to the benefit of all of us... especially the "yes men" that post to TGO.

Mike.357 Postus Maximus

Mike.357

Posted
Posted

His lawsuit makes good points and I am not so sure he has actually broken one single gun carry law in Tennessee.

I am not a fan of Lenny but he may well win this one.

JayC Prolific Contributor

JayC

Posted
Posted

Truth is, if some of the proposed legislation passes, it will make his lawsuit a non-issue. The only thing that would be left that is likely unconstitutional is the TICS system, which I don't think Kwik is complaining about.

Frankly I can't wait for that class action lawsuit, lots of $10's that should be returned to the gun owners of TN.

Steelharp Postus Maximus

Steelharp

Posted
Posted
His lawsuit makes good points and I am not so sure he has actually broken one single gun carry law in Tennessee.

I am not a fan of Lenny but he may well win this one.

I just really hope a win for him actually turns into a win for all of us.

LagerHead Prolific Contributor

LagerHead

Posted
Posted
As do I - and I am very glad to see it move forward.

Plus, I'll be giggling and peeing my pants if Kwik is the spark that burns down some of this state's crappy laws, to the benefit of all of us... especially the "yes men" that post to TGO.

Exactly, since he's never done anything that puts gun owners in a bad light in the eyes of our legislators, who as we all know full well only do what is in the best interest of their minions...er I mean constituents. :whistle:

I just really hope a win for him actually turns into a win for all of us.

I'll drink to that. And if it doesn't turn out that way at least I'll be drunk.

Guest 6.8 AR

Guest 6.8 AR

Posted
Posted

Well, Hell! This is sure a change of attitude. I'm pleasantly surprised.

Punisher84 Postus Maximus

Punisher84

Posted
Posted

Plus, I'll be giggling and peeing my pants if Kwik is the spark that burns down some of this state's crappy laws, to the benefit of all of us... especially the "yes men" that post to TGO.

Don't really get what you mean by that. Unless you mean the people that disagree with ol Lenny on actions, not necessarily principle.

I'd love to see some things change with our laws, but I don't think walking around like an idiot and being a trouble making douche is the way to get that done. If it works fine, but I'll never say he did the right thing or support his actions.

mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted
Don't really get what you mean by that. Unless you mean the people that disagree with ol Lenny on actions, not necessarily principle.

I'd love to see some things change with our laws, but I don't think walking around like an idiot and being a trouble making douche is the way to get that done. If it works fine, but I'll never say he did the right thing or support his actions.

I'm feelin' a little love for Lenny in this thread. I'm gonna send him a few TGO stickers to help bury the hatchett.

daddyo Postus Maximus

daddyo

Posted
Posted

I never agreed with his methods, but it's beginning to look like people are starting to take him seriously. I don't think that's a bad thing at all.

mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted
I remind everyone that Kwik is representing himself. How effective do you think that'll be?

We are just beginning to discover Leonard's true genius. He will prevail.

Fallguy Postus Maximus

Fallguy

Posted
Posted
I remind everyone that Kwik is representing himself. How effective do you think that'll be?

I understand what your saying, but he also wrote the paper that got the judge to reverse his previous ruling

mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted
I understand what your saying, but he also wrote the paper that got the judge to reverse his previous ruling

Leonard has a lawyer in another case, right? I don't think he is totally without legal advice. I still don't understand his "cause", other than trolling for money. Has that changed?

E4 No More Postus Maximus

E4 No More

Posted
Posted
Leonard has a lawyer in another case, right? I don't think he is totally without legal advice. I still don't understand his "cause", other than trolling for money. Has that changed?

I doubt it. He's never indicated otherwise.

E4 No More Postus Maximus

E4 No More

Posted
Posted
I understand what your saying, but he also wrote the paper that got the judge to reverse his previous ruling

Having been around a few judges as a LEO I'd say it's probably more about covering himself then Kwik's arguments. I really don't want a litigious idiot representing a case that will establish case precedence.

mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted
Having been around a few judges as a LEO I'd say it's probably more about covering himself then Kwik's arguments. I really don't want a litigious idiot representing a case that will establish case precedence.

Yep, it feels like a butt covering move to me. Lenny HAS managed to get some press.

Fallguy Postus Maximus

Fallguy

Posted
Posted
Leonard has a lawyer in another case, right? I don't think he is totally without legal advice. I still don't understand his "cause", other than trolling for money. Has that changed?

I don't think he's ever had a lawyer, but I'm not sure.

AFAIK this case has nothing to do with money. It is about the constitutionality of 39-17-1307

Fallguy Postus Maximus

Fallguy

Posted
Posted
Having been around a few judges as a LEO I'd say it's probably more about covering himself then Kwik's arguments. I really don't want a litigious idiot representing a case that will establish case precedence.

You may be right about the judge.

But if the case prevails I really don't care who brought it...

mikegideon Postus Maximus

mikegideon

Posted
Posted
I don't think he's ever had a lawyer, but I'm not sure.

AFAIK this case has nothing to do with money. It is about the constitutionality of 39-17-1307

I'm pretty sure he had one in the Radnor lake thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing

TGO HELPFUL LINKS

Outside of TGO...

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.