Jump to content

Some telling statistics


Recommended Posts

Posted

If some of you read American Handgunner magazine you likely see a regular section called, “Add It Upâ€. It has different numbers and statistics that are interesting. (BTW you can read the digital copy online for free.)

The Jan/Feb 2011 issue had these numbers for the percentage of presidential staff who worked in the private business sector before being appointed to cabinet posts.

Eisenhower - 57%

Reagan - 56%

Clinton - 39%

G W Bush - 55%

Obama - 8%

In other words 92% of Obama’s cabinet positions are filled with people who never worked in private sector business, only in government, academia, or non-profit jobs.

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'd love to know what Jack Kennedy's numbers were. Certainly it explains O's administration's ineptness at working the politcal side of congress. Guess they thought they were above it all and had some sort of manifest destiny.

Guest mosinon
Posted

I'm pretty sure this is untrue. I suspect they got the numbers from here. That link claims that only one of Obamas appointees had a job in the private sector. But Hillary and Napalitono both had jobs in private law firms. Tom Douche, er Dashcle (or whatever) worked in a lobbying firm, Susan Rice worked at consulting firm, Arne Duncan played professional basketball (in Australia) and so forth

I could go on but I think the point is made, crappy journalism is crappy journalism.

Posted (edited)
I'm pretty sure this is untrue. I suspect they got the numbers from here. That link claims that only one of Obamas appointees had a job in the private sector. But Hillary and Napalitono both had jobs in private law firms. Tom Douche, er Dashcle (or whatever) worked in a lobbying firm, Susan Rice worked at consulting firm, Arne Duncan played professional basketball (in Australia) and so forth

I could go on but I think the point is made, crappy journalism is crappy journalism.

Yep. Nothing new here.

EDIT: I don't know if you can even call this crappy journalism. They're just lying their asses off, because they know a percentage of the folks out there will swallow it.

Edited by mikegideon
Posted

I wouldn't call a blogger a journalist anyway, if that's where the figures came from. I would

have been happier with a statement comparing qualifications between each President's

cabinets. But that wouldn't matter, either, because Obama doesn't really use his.

He uses czars.

A marxist here, a marxist there. It really doesn't matter, does it?

Guest mosinon
Posted
I wouldn't call a blogger a journalist anyway, if that's where the figures came from. I would

have been happier with a statement comparing qualifications between each President's

cabinets.

I'd agree about the blogger thing. Bloggers can do good journalism but that is an exception and not a rule so expecting journalism from bloggers is too much.

American Handgunner Magazine, on the other hand, is an actual magazine and should be held to a higher standard. Clearly the didn't fact check and I wonder if they even provided attribution to the original author (I didn't see it). Those are some serious ethical issues for a magazine. Call the New Yorker a liberal rag or whatever but if you've ever tried to write for them you know those guys fact check like there is no tomorrow.

As for the czar thing, it seems to be getting more popular. I guess it is shorthand for saying "this guy is responsible for this" but you'd think they could come up with a better title than czar. Maybe specialist or something.

Posted

Yeh, didn't the Czar thing start with Nixon? It seems to be a way to circumvent Senate confirmation.

It's just tyranny to me. The Czars aren't really accountable. I wonder if Obama has a Czar for suturing?

He does for everything else.:nervous:

I agree with you about the magazine and held to a higher standard. there are a bunch of media outlets

that should be held higher. Too many of them get a pass with their slam dunk rhetoric. It's like

"talking points", which should be a good thing, is dominated by political rhetoric, in stead of honesty.

Too bad news can't be just news. Just the facts, man!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.