Jump to content

Belle Meade revisits handgun carry issue


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

From today's CITY PAPER:

Belle Meade revisits handgun carry laws

Friday, August 27, 2010 at 1:34am By James Nix

print_icon.gifmail_icon.gif

A Belle Meade gun law, which the mayor called inappropriate and discriminatory, could soon be updated. The city’s board of commissioners is floating two proposed ordinances looking to either amend or delete a section of code that prohibits anyone to carry a dangerous weapon “with the intent to go armed” except for an “Army or Navy pistol which shall be carried openly in the hand.” It’s the second phrase in particular that the board stated harkened back to the Reconstruction Era.

In a March 25 message to residents posted on the city’s website, the board stated the ordinance’s language appeared to be intended to restrict free blacks from owning handguns after the Civil War because mostly white men owned Army and Navy pistols.

That law on the city’s books remained largely unnoticed until Leonard Embody, known as the Radnor Lake Rambo for taking an AK-47 pistol on a walk through Radnor Lake State Park, decided to take a Navy model 1851 black powder on a walk down Belle Meade Boulevard.

Authorities stopped Embody, of Brentwood, in both cases and the incidents made headlines. That prompted Belle Meade commissioners to look into the law and propose an ordinance that would amend the law, removing the phrase “except the Army or Navy pistol which shall be carried openly in the hand.”

That proposed ordinance passed on first reading Feb. 17 but has been deferred ever since. After the board introduced the first proposed ordinance, rumors spread that the city would ban the public from carrying handguns, prompting the March website posting by the commissioners. But as Mayor Gray Thornburg told The City Paper, the city just looked to remove the antiquated law from its books and anyone with a state issued handgun carry permit can carry in Belle Meade.

“The long and short of it is,” Thornburg said, “we realized that we had an ordinance that a) was not appropriate and :) more importantly was very discriminatory, and so we needed to make a change.” Then in light of the June 28 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a Chicago handgun ban, and in talking with the Belle Meade police department, commissioners decided the city might not need the old ordinance at all anyway. Last week, the Belle Meade board of commissioners passed on first reading an ordinance that would delete the entire section of city code (Title 11-602.)

So it appears either the section of the original ordinance that allows open carry of just a specific type of gun — Army or Navy pistol — would be deleted or the whole section referring to carrying a gun in the open would be deleted because Belle Meade police would enforce the state law anyway. The thought is, said the mayor, that with the Supreme Court ruling, Belle Meade doesn’t need its own law. With the two ordinances passed on first reading and one sitting in deferral limbo, Belle Meade commissioners are giving themselves options to “clean up” the gun carry ordinance.

“That’s what we’re trying to do,” Thornburg said. “Clean up what’s not in good shape.”

Edited by Proscene
  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It looks like they are taking care of this the way it should be done. Someone should have just brought this to the forefront in a better way than Kwik did but who has the time to sit around reading old laws just to find something like that.

Posted

This same ordinance is in Knoxville's City Code also, and I'm told it is duplicated in who knows how many other town's codes across the state.

- OS

Posted
It looks like they are taking care of this the way it should be done. Someone should have just brought this to the forefront in a better way than Kwik did but who has the time to sit around reading old laws just to find something like that.

It has been said that it was pointed out 3 weeks before.

http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/newsworthy-reports/44049-kwik-files-suit-against-tn-dos-36.html

in post 352

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.