No firearms sign.

[jtluttrell]

I saw this sign today on a jewelery store window, is it a "proper" sign? It is very technically worded.

[TripleDigitRide]

Doesn't appear so.

[Steelharp]

I think that's what called a "Make the terrified civilians feel better while the gun owning population knows better" sign.

[Il Duce]

where was that

[Fire/hunting guy]

well, it does have video, so that will for sure keep the BG's with gun's out!

[Fallguy]

IMO, No, it doesn't comply with 39-17-1359

If the judge and the owner of this building are friends though, I'm going to bet he says you had not doubt what the intentions of the owner were and that is close enough.

Just another reason I would like to see HB3125 pass...so as to require exact wording for a sign to be legally binding...

[Sidinman]

+1 Fallguy

[Guest jackdm3]

When all business owners get hip to correct wording, I don't think the bill will be as much help to us then, do you? I mean then they'll all be able to correctly keep us out and then we'll hardly any better than now.

[Guest bkelm18]

When all business owners get hip to correct wording, I don't think the bill will be as much help to us then, do you? I mean then they'll all be able to correctly keep us out and then we'll hardly any better than now.

I'd rather have a clear cut law that defines what is right and what is wrong than have a law that is ambiguous as to which side of the law you're on.

[mikegideon]

If they're against guns, I don't spend money there. Doesn't have to be a legal sign

[jtluttrell]

where was that

Jareds on Gunbarrel.

[Guest cheez]

Jareds on Gunbarrel.

All Jared jewelry stores have that same sign.

[Hgunner]

The sign does not comply in my opinion, however the owners intent is obvious.

Buy elsewhere or leave when asked.

[Guest archerdr1]

Let em say "He went to Jared, then walked away"

[Guest PapaB]

Jareds on Gunbarrel.

Now that's funny!

BTW, 39-17-1359 (a) says

"Notice of the prohibition shall be posted. Posted notices shall be displayed in prominent locations, including all entrances primarily used by persons entering the building, portion of the building or buildings where weapon possession is prohibited. If the possession of weapons is also prohibited on the premises of the property as well as within the confines of a building located on the property, the notice shall be posted at all entrances to the premises that are primarily used by persons entering the property."

So if it's only in a window it's not a proper posting IMHO.

[Il Duce]

oh well i have no reason to ever shop there anyways

[kb4ns]

If they're against guns, I don't spend money there. Doesn't have to be a legal sign

+1

"He almost went to Jared..."

[jtluttrell]

Now that's funny!

BTW, 39-17-1359 (a) says

"Notice of the prohibition shall be posted. Posted notices shall be displayed in prominent locations, including all entrances primarily used by persons entering the building, portion of the building or buildings where weapon possession is prohibited. If the possession of weapons is also prohibited on the premises of the property as well as within the confines of a building located on the property, the notice shall be posted at all entrances to the premises that are primarily used by persons entering the property."

So if it's only in a window it's not a proper posting IMHO.

I thought the same thing. They would need to have that posted outside the parking lot.

[Guest Dean Wormer]

Interesting, the Jared's at Avenue Crossing in Memphis has a correctly worded sign.

I believe the jared's in Texas post proper 30.06 signs as well

When I go shopping for an engagement ring, I'll send em a "I didn't go to Jared's" letter. GF approves of this.

[Guest TnRebel]

[Guest TnRebel]

[Guest HvyMtl]

Nice card TNRebel. - I am going to the site listed on it and see if I can get a few of them to pass out...

[Varmint]

Jareds on Gunbarrel.

Isn't THAT ironic?

"Varmint"

[Guest archerdr1]

almost as ironic as the texas sign to ban guns being 30.06 You know a good ole boy came up with that one!