Cat's outta the bag

[Guest jackdm3]

Their true colors are front and center in this headline. They aren't concerned about the welfare of U.S. citizens. Gotta look out for:no1:.

Headlines on this site don't usually get this specific.

"With their filibuster-proof Senate supermajority now a thing of the past, Democrats on both sides of Capitol Hill are frantically searching for ways to get President Barack Obama's health-care overhaul out of legislative limbo during an election year. "

Democrats explore triage on health overhaul Capitol Report - MarketWatch

[trblmkr13]

Doesn't everyone want to be taxed at 70% and have bad healthcare

[Guest PeaShooter]

Doesn't everyone want to be taxed at 70% and have bad healthcare

We have friends in the UK. 55% tax .....OUCH!

and yes even though everyone is covered, health care is slow to respond.

[mcurrier]

Doesn't everyone want to be taxed at 70% and have bad healthcare

I know I can't wait!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

They won't do the reconciliation. Too many seats will

be lost. It will be a bloodbath if they do, in house and

senate. They have been threatening this all along.

[Garufa]

Who's "they"? They're all scum. Red, Blue, "conservative", "liberal", R or D, it doesn't matter. SSDD.

I remember a President getting impeached for a BJ.

Is the other crowd any better?

Edited January 23, 2010 by Garufa

[Guest jackdm3]

Maybe if they all had BJ's, congressmen wouldn't be in such of a hurry to pass an inadequate bill. Now for the congresswomen ...

[Guest jackdm3]

Maybe the ladies could get semi-military, government-contracted "hardware":crazy: which may have some microscopic etching that says something like "Hand Of God" that I don't think they'll object to ... at the moment.

[Garufa]

You need to think about those dirty thoughts.

[Chief07]

You need to think about those dirty thoughts.

Oh good God..................

That was so scarry I just spilled my beer.

[mcurrier]

I remember a President getting impeached for a BJ.

It was because he lied about the b.j. (under oath no less), and many other things - all now matters of public record (just like John Edwards said he wasn't the father, but now the truth is out). If a man in the position of the President lies about things, he can not be trusted with the Nation's secrets and is required to be impeached.

In the end, all the truth will be known.

[Worriedman]

You need to think about those dirty thoughts.

God help us, where is the "Dreaded Red X" when you need it?

Clearly an egregious violation of the 8th Amendment there!

[Guest 6.8 AR]

I wonder if that will happen with Obama. How many lies?

I wish

[Guest 6.8 AR]

You need to think about those dirty thoughts.

An image like this would have hurt less. There that's much better, or worse:p

Edited January 26, 2010 by 6.8 AR

[Guest jackdm3]

Hey! I didn't know we had nirples here!

[Smith]

It was because he lied about the b.j. (under oath no less), and many other things - all now matters of public record (just like John Edwards said he wasn't the father, but now the truth is out). If a man in the position of the President lies about things, he can not be trusted with the Nation's secrets and is required to be impeached.

In the end, all the truth will be known.

It is was in correlation to a sexual harassment case (Paula Jones) that correlated in all the other issues coming out. It was during that case that the perjury, witness tampering, and obstruction issues came about. They did a good job making it seem like that's all it was about, but it was not.

[Guest 6.8 AR]

Hey! I didn't know we had nirples here!

I just noticed that, too. Should I delete it?

[trblmkr13]

You need to think about those dirty thoughts.

Scary resemblance

[Guest jackdm3]

Delete it? Only after you take a formal poll to see what others think.