Challenge "Guns-in-bars" Law: Nashville attorneys David Randolph Smith & Adam Dread

[Guest HexHead]

Injunction denied

half a minute ago from TweetDeck

WhooHoo

[Guest jmac]

Injunction Denied!

[Guest ScottD]

How about the constitutionality of the bill?

[Guest kdpate]

:clap:

[Guest HexHead]

I can hardly wait to hear how that douchebag Dread spins this.

[Guest Fenris]

I am interested to hear from Daniel et al when they have more than 144 characters to tell us what the judge said, etc.

This is good.

[Guest HexHead]

How about the constitutionality of the bill?

Maybe that was the part she was referring to that merited a full hearing?

[Wingshooter]

I'm not sure on what grounds they could argue a law that grants 2A rights is unconstitutional.

Great news on the injunction, or lack thereof!

[Guest Fenris]

Daniel said if he understands correctly, the next hearing is in 90 days.

[Guest HexHead]

Next hearing in 90 days if I understand correctly.

Great. Just flippin great. ;(

[Guest pws_smokeyjones]

last week sombody posted about how the opposition was 'more prepared' than we were for this fight. If this 90 days thing is right, that gives us 90 days to get REAL information out to the public about this law. This is a great opportunity for those of us that know the facts to help people understand. You can bet that the Anti-gun crowd will not sleep for the next 90 days thinking of ways to spin this.

[Wingshooter]

Daniel said if he understands correctly, the next hearing is in 90 days.

That gives us 90 days to prove we are responsible, and they are wrong.

[G27]

Great. Just flippin great. ;(

If it's about constitutionality, they have close to zero chance of winning it. My understanding is that they challenged the constitutionality in order to sway the judge into allowing the injunction - with that being shot down, there's little chance anything will happen.

[Guest ScottD]

LOL @ last Tweet

[Guest Fenris]

Yeah, I saw that and felt bad for him, but the timing of it was funny.

[Volzfan]

F*****g parking ticket5 minutes ago from TweetDeck

I'll chip in on it!

[Guest HexHead]

last week sombody posted about how the opposition was 'more prepared' than we were for this fight. If this 90 days thing is right, that gives us 90 days to get REAL information out to the public about this law. This is a great opportunity for those of us that know the facts to help people understand. You can bet that the Anti-gun crowd will not sleep for the next 90 days thinking of ways to spin this.

We'd better hire sky writers then, because the media sure isn't going to lift a finger to help us get our message out. If anything, they'll be doing the full court press.

[Wingshooter]

Great. Just flippin great. ;(

Delays, delays, delays....

[Guest HexHead]

That gives us 90 days to prove we are responsible, and they are wrong.

Think we can get the open carry guys to take a hiatus?

[Guest HexHead]

Delay, delay, delay....

HAHAHAHAHA.

[Guest nashvegas]

Suit Thrown Out That Would Stop Guns In Restaurants Bill - NewsChannel 5.com - Nashville, Tennessee -

[Guest HexHead]

From the Nashville City Paper....

Chancellor denies injunction to stop guns-in-bars law

Monday, July 13, 2009 at 3:58pm

By Nate Rau

The new state law permitting carry permitholders to take guns into places that serve alcohol will go into effect tonight after Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman denied on Monday a quest for a temporary injunction.

Bonnyman recommended the challenge to go forward in 90 days for a merits hearing, but said procedurally she did not have the power to institute an injunction at this time.

Refresh this page for more details as they become available.

Chancellor denies injunction to stop guns-in-bars law | Nashville City Paper: Nashville's Online Source for Daily News

[Guest pws_smokeyjones]

Holy Smokes ! they actually included the results of the poll!

[Guest kdpate]

I see some light back pedaling in that article just then....

[Wingshooter]

Think we can get the open carry guys to take a hiatus?

I'll be concealed.