Jump to content

Protest Easy Guns


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

That would just give them more free publicity.

Better to have a demonstration at a different time complaining about the draconian restrictions for good citizens to purchase a firearm.

Guest Old Chief
Posted

Now that is a poster that I can agree with.

Posted

Have these idiots every purchased a gun...or were they spoon fed their "talking points" and like good little sheep they're going with the program

Posted

If it smells like a sheep, follows it's fellow sheep around with blind faith, and runs away at the first sign of the big bad wolf in the middle of the sheep pen... It's probably a sheep.

Guest jcoyle6
Posted

Don't worry, Oleg has given you permission. You are using his work as it is intended.

Posted

While I doubt just "having" a gun would have stopped Cho (you better know how to use it while under extreme stress), I've gotta say that the gun-banners movement would be better served by people who actually know what they are talking about. Complete ignorance, just complete.

If this woman was an animal rights activist, she probably wouldn't be able to tell a cat from a dog. (Hint, the cat is designed to be fired from the hip...:up:)

The more extremism I am exposed to, the more ignorance I am exposed to 99 times out of 100.

Posted

I was commenting mostly about the Protest Easy Guns video. ("The woman" I refer to is in the video, not the person holding the pistol in the poster.)

The poster is fine, I was just making a "pro-training" comment (a shock, I know...) saying that just "HAVING" a gun is not enough -knowing how to use it under stress is just as important.

I guess I'm missing it. What's wrong with the poster?
Posted

Can we keep cars out of prohibit hands?

I dare some one to go to their protest CC and have your picture taken with the leader. Make sure to wear something that prints a little bit so we know you actually had it one you at the time.

Posted
I was just making a "pro-training" comment (a shock, I know...) saying that just "HAVING" a gun is not enough -knowing how to use it under stress is just as important.

This is what bothers me about a lot of the "training" we see advertised. Much of it gives the impression of preparing shooters for action under stress but I'm afraid that training is largely an illusion.

I'm not talking about you, Len. You and your folks seem pretty level headed about what training you offer. I'm talking about so much of the Rambozo training that's supposed to train you to become an "operator" or something equally laughable. I'm afraid there are a lot of people who take some of this "training" but who are not prepared mentally to act when a bad situation actually happens. And they don't have a clue about that. I suspect a lot of these pretend soldiers will be of little use to either themselves or their supposed comrades if the time should ever come for action.

[/rantoff] :up:

Posted
This is what bothers me about a lot of the "training" we see advertised. Much of it gives the impression of preparing shooters for action under stress but I'm afraid that training is largely an illusion.

I'm not talking about you, Len. You and your folks seem pretty level headed about what training you offer. I'm talking about so much of the Rambozo training that's supposed to train you to become an "operator" or something equally laughable. I'm afraid there are a lot of people who take some of this "training" but who are not prepared mentally to act when a bad situation actually happens. And they don't have a clue about that. I suspect a lot of these pretend soldiers will be of little use to either themselves or their supposed comrades if the time should ever come for action.

[/rantoff] :D

Actually it's a fact that some large number of both soldiers and police officers are incapable of firing on another person under stress. I am glad I will likely never have to be in that situation. I couldn't predict with any certainty whether I could or not. I know philosophically I have no problem with it. But it is an unknown.

Posted
Actually it's a fact that some large number of both soldiers and police officers are incapable of firing on another person under stress. I am glad I will likely never have to be in that situation. I couldn't predict with any certainty whether I could or not. I know philosophically I have no problem with it. But it is an unknown.

Only those who have been there and done that know for sure. I agree with you I hope I don't have to find out. As the Romans said "pray for peace and prepare for war."

Posted
Only those who have been there and done that know for sure. I agree with you I hope I don't have to find out. As the Romans said "pray for peace and prepare for war."

heheh we have a word for those guys that can't properly engage the enemy...several in fact..

one would be "toc-roach"...another and more older term..."remf":D

Posted

Now Tower, a lot of remf's (or fobbits these days) never get a chance to find out it they can pull the trigger. Unfortunately, with modern technology we need a lot of remf's.

But I agree with everyone. You never know if you can "operate" until the time comes. Training just gives you a skill set. Whether you can act on it, is another matter.

Posted

true...and every time it happens...there's always something new..so I guess the possibility of freezing is always there so I guess you can't really judge someone unless you were there...civillian OR professional.

Posted

Agreed all around.

Another issue to confront is that there are many folks out there who are philosophically opposed to using deadly force. So, putting a gun in their hands is useless for possibly two reasons -not being able to "operate" under stress and not being willing to take a life.

And I would argue that for some people, BOTH issues are unknown. These folks won't know if they can perform under stress or be willing to pull the trigger until confronted with the situation. I'd go out on a limb and say that there are many more of these people out there than are willing to admit it.

Unless you've "been there/done that" you don't know for sure. Not 100% at least. I imagine there is some philosophical comfort in knowing for sure -either way.

Posted

Unless you've "been there/done that" you don't know for sure. Not 100% at least.

That's true, but after a while you get to where you can do a pretty accurate prediction about who will perform and who won't. The quiet but resolute guys do fine. It's the blowhards who want to be the center of attention you have to watch out for. You also have to watch out for the joiners. There seem to be a lot of people doing "operator training" who do it just to be part of some imaginary club of Rambo-like trainees.

Posted

No amount of anti-gun legislation could have stopped Cho from obtaining a gun. I think we can all agree that is a fact. Drugs are illegal but if you want them you can get them.

What we do not know, and will never know is what would have happened if Cho had encountered armed citizens in the first room he walked into. But I don’t think it could have ended any worse than it did.

Training isn’t an issue with these people either. They just don’t want you to have guns.

Cho could have used a car, ax, or chain saw and there would still be a flurry of hand wringers thinking that there needs to be some kind of legislation to address what happened.

Posted
There seem to be a lot of people doing "operator training" who do it just to be part of some imaginary club of Rambo-like trainees.

Ouch... that’s going to leave a mark. :D

Posted

Dave, lots of people get training for a lot of good reasons. Military people are constantly retrained both by formal training and experience. Lots of LEOs go back and get extra training to give them an edge. But these folks train with people who actually know how to execute the skills and are proven by experience to be able to do so. The military is trained by instructors who always have been in these types of experiences. LEOs generally, although not always, train with people with a lot of real world experience. Lately we have seen some LEO training by "operator wannabes", but that's not the rule and officers who would train with them are not top line people anyway. And it's a waste of their money. You can't train the stupid.

In the past few months, I've been exposed to more civilians who want to pretend they are "operators" by getting training from people who have little or no experience themselves in that area than I even knew existed. Nothing wrong with doing that to gain some skills or for fun, but a lot of these students seem to actually think this makes them capable of executing battle plans.

That's scary and also pitiful.

And we see examples of students and teachers who get themselves into trouble, along with their comrades in arms, by imagining themselves capable of executing special operations. I was talking to a friend in Baghdad a couple of weeks ago who is now a contractor for a major firm. He's retired career Army SF and knows what he is doing. He told me several horror stories about neophyte Rambozos who work for other firms and get themselves and others into jeopardy by their attitude and lack of experience.

As I say, there is nothing wrong with this sort of training for the public as long as the instructors make sure the students know this doesn't make them into real soldiers or supermen. But the training field unfortunately has a lot of hypesters who want to bring in the students and their money with glitz and flash and there seem to be plenty of marks willing to fall for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.