Official Thread for TN House / Senate Override of HB0962 Gubernatorial Veto

[GLOCKMEISTER]

Again it didnt matter... they have always can... and will.

[Guest SUNTZU]

They'll pass that one, not pass ours, and say that's good enough.

[G27]

He reiterated Serpas and Bredesons statement about Guns and alcohol

Hahaha, beautiful!

[Wingshooter]

What did he do?

Rep. Watson asked if it was thought that the Gov. would veto the bill to allow LEO's to carry in restauraunts that serve alcohol. Then there was some discussion about how the GOV. has LEO's with him all the time anyway. It was a slam on the Gov. about the veto. It was funny.

[Fallguy]

Again it didnt matter... they have always can... and will.

Well not at all times.....but they will when this becomes law.

[Punisher84]

If the bill doesn't pass I guess we could all go out for a police reserve program lol

[waynesan]

That was hilarious!!!

[waynesan]

Boy they're flying through these bills now.

[dralarms]

Boy they're flying through these bills now.

Yea but I'm tired of re starting the video.

[Falcon1]

How would HB0147 Amendment 2 affect five days in HB0962? So know, there may be places which won't be open five days a week (three instead), but serve alcohol? How do we know which is which?

[Guest db99wj]

Yea but I'm tired of re starting the video.

My firefox does not like this video, I have to use IE.

[Guest HexHead]

Armstrong is trying to change the definition of what a restaurant is, which I bet could **** up HB0962.

[Falcon1]

My firefox does not like this video, I have to use IE.

My Firefox is fine with it--when did you last update?

[Fallguy]

How would HB0147 Amendment 2 affect five days in HB0962? So know, there may be places which won't be open five days a week (three instead), but serve alcohol? How do we know which is which?

It wouldn't....HB0962 has it's own definition of a restaurant, it doesn't refer to another section of code.

[Guest db99wj]

Armstrong is trying to change the definition of what a restaurant is, which I bet could **** up HB0962.

It just thundered here, that could **** up HB0962 as well.

[Guest VolGrad]

Armstrong is trying to change the definition of what a restaurant is, which I bet could **** up HB0962.

My understanding is the override must be exactly what the Gov VETO'd. If any changes are made then the Gov gets another shot at it.

[Guest canynracer]

crap...I can stay...keep this posted..I gotta go...

[Guest Bluemax]

By defining the definition of a restaurant as opposed to a bar, they may be leading up to the big dance

[Wingshooter]

Armstrong is trying to change the definition of what a restaurant is, which I bet could **** up HB0962.

Yeah, this is getting interesting...

[Guest HexHead]

It wouldn't....HB0962 has it's own definition of a restaurant, it doesn't refer to another section of code.

You mean the 4 days thing? But if places are only serving food 3 days, then we couldn't carry there.

[Guest db99wj]

My Firefox is fine with it--when did you last update?

Not sure, i get automatic stuff all the time, I just tried it again, I get audio no video. Firefox seems to be faster by about 4-5 seconds on the where they are.

[GLOCKMEISTER]

it doesnt matter....

[Wingshooter]

I don't think the Rep. from Union Co. has been paying attention... LOL

[Falcon1]

It wouldn't....HB0962 has it's own definition of a restaurant, it doesn't refer to another section of code.

You mean the 4 days thing? But if places are only serving food 3 days, then we couldn't carry there.

That is my concern. Now, cover has just been given to three-day restaurants (which if I understand the debate were not allowed before under TCA) to operate, which means there are now potentially difficult-to-recognize places which will not be legal to carry under the provisions of HB0962.

[Billco]

Been playing solitaire on his laptop