Jump to content

P320 Debacle


Recommended Posts

Posted

Does the recent post by Sig change anyone's mind on the P320?  I have carried one for over a year and never had any problems and it shoots like a dream.  Am I just waiting for the inevitable?  Is this mostly bad handling practices that people don't want to take responsibility for?  Just curious

  • Moderators
Posted (edited)

No, it doesn’t change my mind about the 320 at all. In fact, their post only further confirms for me that they don’t give a damn about their customers, and are willing to lie and obfuscate in attempts to protect their bottom line. There is far too much evidence of problems with the platform, not just the un-commanded, discharges, but out of battery detonations and damages due to poor protection from magazine over-insertion.

 

So despite their very feeble efforts, it absolutely did not end that day.

Edited by Chucktshoes
  • Like 3
Posted

I have owned multiple P320s over the years. The one I purchased a few years ago was sent to Sig as part of their free upgrade to address drop safety concerns. I shoot IDPA and have never had an issue with the pistol. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

1- Yea people do lie to cover their arse, or hole n the leg

2- SIG is a big corporation which some see as a cash cow

3- Have shot P320/365 in IDPA. Only AD’s I ever saw on any gun were from people who had finger on the trigger when they shouldn’t have. That meant a DQ from the match and possibly future matches as well

4- If my career were on the line as a Leo , might cook up an excuse to stay employed. That is just being human. 

Edited by JustEd
  • Like 2
Posted

No it didnt change my mind.

But that said:

If someone calls you a Horse, you punch him in the mouth.

If a second person calls you a Horse, you call him an A-hole.

If a third person calls you a Horse, you probably ought to start looking for a saddle...

 

I have not personally seen one go off, but I know and trust a couple who have. Not worth it to me

  • Like 2
  • Administrator
Posted

Something is awry, even if it is just that Sig did very little to openly address the issue when it was "lore" and hadn't completely become widely accepted as being true, regardless of the validity of the claims.

I have one and I really like it, but I have also sidelined it until I have more reasons than a PR statement to restore my confidence in it.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Never seen one self-activate, but I did witness a kB (SIG’s other PR problem).  Too many other options for me to roll the dice on a 320. 

Posted (edited)

Carrying a loaded Sig P320 with no thumb safety is the equivalent of carrying a loaded 1911 with the hammer cocked...and no thumb safety to engage. And that's crazy to me. You have a gun ready to fire as soon as 4.5lbs of pressure finds its way to that trigger, regardless if it was intentional or not.

I don't think the gun (P320) is defective. I think the concept of selling a gun with no safety, no trigger 'doohickey, (a la Glock), and a trigger pull that light (4.5lbs) is defective. It is just too easy for that trigger to get pushed/pulled/bumped/nudged/tugged and fire the gun unintentionally.

I like Sigs. I have Sigs. But a non-thumb safety 320 is a no-go for me. If all you used it for was competition/target shooting, maybe it would be okay. But as a "duty gun" in a holster? Nope. As a concealed carry gun, stashed on my person somewhere? Heck no! As a gun stashed in a drawer for home defense? Uh...maybe?

Sig can say whatever they want, but it's not going to change the public's perception of the product at this point. Perception isn't reality but that doesn't matter if no one wants to buy your product because of fear it may 'accidentally' go off.

Edited by Frog4aday
  • Like 1
Posted

IN MY OPINION. In the old days Sig would have pulled the platform from the market. The loss would have been made up for in good will sales. These days, pulling a product would be equal to admission of guilt. The reputation of the platform is tainted and will never recover. Sig will let it die out and pull it due to poor sales while never admitting it had any issues.

  • Like 1
Posted

I like a good 3D animated explanation. I watched this twice and I'm stumped. Where at in this sequence do folks think the failure is happening when the trigger is not pulled?

 

 

Posted

I've dropped my 320 X-Carry at least 3-4 times in training and have never had an accidental misfire.  I don't train on concrete but I know on hard packed sand there isn't an issue.  I will still carry it as a main secondary with no worries though.

 

Posted

I have mixed feelings with Sig. One of my favorite 1911’s is a Sig. But I’ve found them difficult on warranty matters at times. I just sent back a brand new unfired cerakoted firearm that was not prepped correctly so the coating chips off easily. I felt like I got the third degree with the rep. Seemed like they thought I was trying to pull something, so I don’t expect them to do the right thing, but hoping. It’s just different working with them now that they have military contracts.

All that said, I have 3 320 modules that have been in various configurations / slides / grip modules. Never a problem.

I didn’t know about this article OP called out. But yesterday I received an email from Gray’s that seemed out of the blue until this. It referred to  “renewed  discussions” about the 320. So now I get the context. This is their.02 if anyone cares:

At Grayguns, we don’t take anything for granted. We test, we push, and we go beyond normal use conditions to find out what a firearm is truly capable of. Over the years, in controlled environments, we have deliberately attempted to compromise the mechanical safeties of the P320, looking for ways an unintended discharge could occur. Despite those efforts, we have never been able to induce a discharge without the trigger being actuated. That does not mean people are wrong to be asking questions.

The fact that we have not been able to make it happen does not change the reality that people believe it’s happening. We understand that too, and because of that, we are going to continue to explore every scenario, no matter how implausible it may seem. If there is a way for a failure to occur, we want to find it, understand it, and make sure the people who depend on this firearm have the information they need.
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.