Jump to content

Polymer Ar-15 lowers


Recommended Posts

Posted

As cheap as standard Al lowers are, I see no reason for a poly lower. I see no advantage and only disadvantages across the board. 

  • Like 8
Posted
9 minutes ago, Nikiski Dave said:

Never a problem with mine. 

I've got a buddy that has used one for years without any problems as well...

leroy.. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Smith said:

As cheap as standard Al lowers are, I see no reason for a poly lower. I see no advantage and only disadvantages across the board. 

What about weight? I had a thought last week of building a real light AR for old farts. I have a couple of light barrels in the parts box.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, mikegideon said:

What about weight? I had a thought last week of building a real light AR for old farts. I have a couple of light barrels in the parts box.

Polymer lower ~4oz

Alloy lower ~10-12oz

Shaving off nearly half a pound from one part is significant.

 

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, leroy said:

I've got a buddy that has used one for years without any problems as well...

leroy.. 

you know what brand your buddies was

Posted

OK. This thread has inspired me. I think I'm going to go for a lightweight AR. The priciest thing will be a low mass BCG. At first glance, the New Frontier Stripped lower and parts kit looks OK. I'll need a light optic too. Any suggestions? I have a Romeo on my closet gun.

And, with my new KY permit, I get to skip the background check. 

  • Wow 1
Posted

I have a few of the TN Arms Co polymer lowers from a few years ago built up.  I haven't had a single issue with them.  If you are going lightweight I think the KP-15 setups are tough to beat.  Also a very slippery slope where you start losing your oz/$ pretty quick.

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, FrankD said:

I have a few of the TN Arms Co polymer lowers from a few years ago built up.  I haven't had a single issue with them.  If you are going lightweight I think the KP-15 setups are tough to beat.  Also a very slippery slope where you start losing your oz/$ pretty quick.

I'ma thinkin my buddy's lower is a TN Arms...

leroy...

Posted

Plus one on the TN Arms Co. lower.  I've got a 9mm AR pistol with the polymer lower and I'm well satisfied with it.  I also built an AR10 with one of their lowers and that polymer helps shave weight off.

Posted

The weight savings make sense. Id be worried about take down pin holes and trigger pin holes wallowing out. Especially in a 9mm or 308. I did see a hybrid with metal reinforced holes. But again, unless weight is a main issues, I'd prefer an aluminum lower. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Smith said:

The weight savings make sense. Id be worried about take down pin holes and trigger pin holes wallowing out. Especially in a 9mm or 308. I did see a hybrid with metal reinforced holes. But again, unless weight is a main issues, I'd prefer an aluminum lower. 

If it wasn't for the weight difference, I probably wouldn't own a plastic gun. The New Frontier lower has a lifetime warrantee. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Rowdy said:

Plus one on the TN Arms Co. lower.  I've got a 9mm AR pistol with the polymer lower and I'm well satisfied with it.  I also built an AR10 with one of their lowers and that polymer helps shave weight off.

Have two of the TN Arms Co lowers myself -- one a lightweight .223, the other a .300 AAC.  Never a problem with either.

Cheers,

Whisper

Posted (edited)

I've tried a bunch of times to build a lightweight AR, but I have favorite parts/components that I won't live w/out. Then I see the prices on the pencil thin barrels that I don't even like. Then I realize if rifle is too light I'll want buy a really expensive trigger to compensate for the weight. By the time I'm done refusing those compromises I wind up at 8 or 9 pounds anyway, LOL.

I think what puts me off from seeing the lightweight build through is that in an ultralight 5.5lb AR the polymer lower saves less than 10% in weight. Somewhere in between, like a 7lb rifle that weight savings is only 7% and I don't have a use-case that justifies the cost to save that much weight.

Edited by BigK
Posted

I've picked up a few of the super light ARs at gunshows, like sub 6lbs. Everything is skeletonized. I like the idea but not the practicality. However, i'm one of those people who kinda associate weight with quality, so super light just feels flimsy to me. The last thing i want is a rifle that can't hold up to slight abuse.

I suppose it all depends on your frame, strength, health, use case, etc. At 6'2", it doesn't hurt my feelings to tote beefier rifle.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have a bunch of AR's and a Can cannon. They all have great parts (except my A2). I won't be hurting for great rifles if I build a flimsy one.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, mikegideon said:

I have a bunch of AR's and a Can cannon. They all have great parts (except my A2). I won't be hurting for great rifles if I build a flimsy one.

 

Yup, makes sense as it's not a primary

Posted

I've had a PlumCrazy poly lower for years. Had many uppers on it in various calibers. Only thing I don't like is the trigger guard can't be replaced. Trigger isn't bad, functions fine.

My New Frontier poly lower has a poly upper on it and shoots rather well for how cheaply I put it together. It is one built for my dad to carry around in the woods. At 69yrs old, he loves the weight savings over a standard AR.....

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.