Tennessean concerned about abortion "privacy"

[Guest KWW67]

Abortion amendment would rob women of their rights

Today's Topic: Legislators target abortion

http://tennessean.com/article/20090315/OPINION01/903150357

Everyone check this out. Talk about setting yourself up! Let your voice be heard in the comments. Here is mine......

I find it very amusing the writer uses privacy in the first paragraph regarding abortion, all while slamming the privacy of handgun permit holders. I know of no constitutional right to kill an unborn child, but I do know of a right to keep and bear arms as stated in the second ammendment as affirmed by the US supreme court. So my question is why does this newspaper report the negative on gun related issues, but support the death of an unborn fetus??? I would guess a pure, old fashioned liberal agenda.

[Ninja9]

Well said, man

[Guest archerdr1]

exactly

[RDL]

Very well said. Got right to the heart of the matter.

[BryanP]

The general public has no right to know whether or not I have a carry permit.

The general public also has no right to know who has what medical procedures.

It all comes under the heading of "Nunya damn business."

[Guest bkelm18]

The general public has no right to know whether or not I have a carry permit.

The general public also has no right to know who has what medical procedures.

It all comes under the heading of "Nunya damn business."

+1

[Punisher84]

The general public has no right to know whether or not I have a carry permit.

The general public also has no right to know who has what medical procedures.

It all comes under the heading of "Nunya damn business."

Agreed. I don't support abortion, but I'm not big on telling people what to do with their bodies either.

[Ninja9]

Yeah. I think it would be at least as wrong to publish a list like that. But I think KWW67 was just pointing out the absurdity of the writers position on the two issues.... That's how i took it anyway