CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY

[Erik88]

9 minutes ago, Snaveba said:

It’s not bad, but it’s not Constitutional Carry either 

Agreed. Permitless carry might be a better name. 

[Quavodus]

13 minutes ago, papa61 said:

true this is not constitutional carry. restrictions on WHERE and when and allthe other tripe. But it is a bite of the big elephant sandwich. remember, we didn't get here all at once, it took years, decades, to erode our freedoms. we won't get it back all at once either.

Sad, but, true.

[Wingshooter]

Hmm. Interesting. I’ve been absent from all social media, ect for a long time, so I’m catching up on what’s going on LOL. Good to see something move in the right direction. 

[JN01]

If I am reading it correctly, the Senate adopted an amended version of SB765 which differed from the original in that there is no longer the requirement for the person to meet the qualifications to obtain an enhanced concealed carry permit which includes being a Tennessee resident.  Does the amended permitless carry bill include non-residents then?

[Refleks]

Now we just need to get them to remove the force of law from a no-gun sign (Presently Class B misdemeanor, fine only).  The result would be it's not inherently unlawful to carry past a no-gun sign into a private business, but if they see it and ask you to leave, you must or the force of law applies at that point  (trespass).

If this was signed on the 8th, when does it take effect? 


 

 

Edited April 11, 2021 by Refleks