Jump to content

Jacksonville Shooting


DaveTN

Recommended Posts

Posted

 So much for background checks 

The gunman who opened fire on a "Madden NFL 19" tournament in Jacksonville, Florida, on Sunday was hospitalized previously for mental illness, according to court records.

Divorce filings from the parents of 24-year-old David Katz of Baltimore showed that as a teenager he was hospitalized twice in psychiatric facilities and was prescribed anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications, The Associated Press first reported Monday.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/27/jacksonville-gaming-tournament-shooter-had-been-hospitalized-for-mental-illness-documents-show.html

  • Moderators
Posted
16 minutes ago, xsubsailor said:

 So much for background checks 

The gunman who opened fire on a "Madden NFL 19" tournament in Jacksonville, Florida, on Sunday was hospitalized previously for mental illness, according to court records.

Divorce filings from the parents of 24-year-old David Katz of Baltimore showed that as a teenager he was hospitalized twice in psychiatric facilities and was prescribed anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medications, The Associated Press first reported Monday.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/27/jacksonville-gaming-tournament-shooter-had-been-hospitalized-for-mental-illness-documents-show.html

The background check will only pop as prohibited if he was committed by a judge. Non-adjudicated hospitalization doesn’t count. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Chucktshoes said:

The background check will only pop as prohibited if he was committed by a judge. Non-adjudicated hospitalization doesn’t count. 

I guess that makes sense but I kind of thought mental Illiness is mental Illiness whether a judge says it or a doctor says it. If thats the case and a doctor declares you a raving lunatic and says you need to be in a mental hospital you can still legally buy a gun but if a judge says it then you can't. That just does not sound like they are doing a very good job with the mental issues of gun ownership huh?............JMHO

Posted
28 minutes ago, bersaguy said:

I guess that makes sense but I kind of thought mental Illiness is mental Illiness whether a judge says it or a doctor says it. If thats the case and a doctor declares you a raving lunatic and says you need to be in a mental hospital you can still legally buy a gun but if a judge says it then you can't. 

That is correct. Unless it’s a court order it isn’t in a searchable database that would show up in a background check. Those wanting the background checks to show that don’t seem to understand all their problems will be there also. When they figure that out; they won’t want that.

  • Like 1
  • Moderators
Posted

It’s also a double edged sword. We want to minimize the risks of someone who is mentally ill in a violent way, but we don’t want to stigmatize mental illness in such a way that we  punish folks for seeking help because it will act as a deterrent to folks seeking help they need. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, DaveTN said:

That is correct. Unless it’s a court order it isn’t in a searchable database that would show up in a background check. Those wanting the background checks to show that don’t seem to understand all their problems will be there also. When they figure that out; they won’t want that.

Yea, when they begin to allow the background checks to begin dipping beyond where the courts allow them to go it will be a whole different story and then they will not want that part of back ground checks allowed. They can't have it both ways they either get all the background in mental health or none.....JMHO

Posted
1 minute ago, Chucktshoes said:

It’s also a double edged sword. We want to minimize the risks of someone who is mentally ill in a violent way, but we don’t want to stigmatize mental illness in such a way that we  punish folks for seeking help because it will act as a deterrent to folks seeking help they need. 

Very true Chuck. This is not an issue subject that can done without a lot of forethought and input from Medical Professionals. It cannot just be a political issue but a medical issue also..........JMHO

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Looks like the sharks are circling already.

Watch Matt Morgan try to justify what he is doing. And telling us what we want.

I hope the businesses have the resources to fight this dirt bag.

 

Quote

 

Edited by DaveTN

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

TRADING POST NOTICE

Before engaging in any transaction of goods or services on TGO, all parties involved must know and follow the local, state and Federal laws regarding those transactions.

TGO makes no claims, guarantees or assurances regarding any such transactions.

THE FINE PRINT

Tennessee Gun Owners (TNGunOwners.com) is the premier Community and Discussion Forum for gun owners, firearm enthusiasts, sportsmen and Second Amendment proponents in the state of Tennessee and surrounding region.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is a presentation of Enthusiast Productions. The TGO state flag logo and the TGO tri-hole "icon" logo are trademarks of Tennessee Gun Owners. The TGO logos and all content presented on this site may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. The opinions expressed on TGO are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the site's owners or staff.

TNGunOwners.com (TGO) is not a lobbying organization and has no affiliation with any lobbying organizations.  Beware of scammers using the Tennessee Gun Owners name, purporting to be Pro-2A lobbying organizations!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to the following.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines
 
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.